Further Information

Meta-Analyses of The Epidemiological Evidence Relating ETS to Lung Cancer and Heart Disease | Peter Lee, Barbara Forey, Jan Hamling
Article Published: 2006

Type: Meta-Analysis
Published By: PN Lee Statistics and Computing Ltd

Further Information

"Epidemiological evidence relating to two possible effects of ETS in never smokers is presented elsewhere, based on over 60 studies of lung cancer and over 30 studies of heart disease. In attempting to assess this overall evidence, the technique of meta-analysis is often used to combine the relative risk estimates from the individual studies. Results from a number of meta-analyses are presented in this document. However, before presenting these results, attention should be drawn to some features and limitations of the technique. "

"Meta-analysis was originally designed to combine evidence from randomised studies of similar design, to try to obtain a more accurate estimate of the possible effect of treatment. However, in recent years it has been increasingly used to combine evidence from epidemiological studies of quite widely varying design. It is important to realise that such a procedure may result in a combined relative risk estimate that has narrow confidence limits and therefore appears precise, but is in fact a quite inaccurate estimate of the true effect of treatment (if any)."

FORCES is supported solely by the efforts of the readers. Please become a member or donate what you can.

Contact Info
Forces Contacts
Media Contacts
Evidence Categories
Quick Look-Up
List of Methodological Errors in ETS Studies
Hill's Criteria and Authoritative Citations
What Must an Epidemiologic Study Warrant?
Table of All Studies on ETS and Lung Cancer up to 2006

Pie Charts of ETS/Lung Cancer Studies
How many cigarettes must be smoked to create an ETS danger?

Passive Smoking: an Institutional Problem
A 13-minute video to understand the fraud

If you like to read rather then listen, download
Now available for free