Editorial - April 11, 1997
BILL C-71 WILL PASS THE SENATE
We hope we are wrong. We hope that, after the fact, you can laugh at our prediction, so that we
can laugh with you.
But we believe that Bill C-71, the latest shame of this country, will pass the Senate.
There are many reasons inducing us to this conclusion, and a short analysis may clarify our
position. For brevity, we are expressing our analysis in point form.
- The state-funded unrelenting, alarmistic propaganda portraying smoking as the epidemic of the
century is forcing politicians to "do something" about the issue. Politicians are not and cannot be
specialized in every field they deal with, thus they must rely on external input.
- The input available from authoritative sources is almost unidirectional against smoking. The
noisy part of the medical establishment, for example, does not hesitate to validate the lies and
exaggerations of the antismoking agenda in exchange for high financial and political gains.
- The machine created by the antismoking agenda does not allow information -- scientific or
otherwise -- contrary to the agenda to reach the public. As a consequence, the majority of the
public has formed the opinion that tobacco is indeed an epidemic, thus there is vast support given
to all measures to eradicate it, regardless of their nature.
- As a result of the above, politicians are being pushed and manipulated into believing the
misinformation fed to them. They have publicly exposed themselves, and there is no way back.
Moreover, those politicians who may suspect or see the untruthfulness of this propaganda, do not
dare to oppose antismoking measures at all, or they do so very indirectly, thus ineffectively. They
are aware that in the present climate of witch hunt, opposition may cost them their career.
- The smoking issue provides a formidable diversion from the real, pressing problems of our
society, and the inability of our political class to solve them.
- Historically, the issue of personal liberties has been a low priority in Canada, as the population
has always looked up to and relied on the government as the only dispenser of privileges,
prohibition, and public conduct. The knowledge about the corruption of the political world is taken
for granted, and at any rate this awareness is not strong enough to debase the notion that
delegating the protection of liberties to the state is the right thing to do, as opposed to guarding
personal rights at the individual level. For this reason, the population allows the government to
revoke any liberty that conflicts with its agenda, as long as a believable reason is used as
justification. In this case, the reason is health: we must surrender our personal liberties in the
name of health.
- The infatuation of Canadians with the concept of authority is very deeply rooted in our culture.
Authority spells security, order, protection, and a direction to be taken, without the risks and
hassle of self-determination. The sacrifice of personal liberties to the altar of authority is small
change to be paid to appease the demon of insecurity. One can tell at a glance that Canada
never went through a Revolution.
In the opinion of this writer, the only hope to defeat this liberty-killing bill is the Supreme Court
of Canada.
In the meantime, let it be known that neither FORCES Canada, nor its president will relent in their
efforts to disseminate the truth, and we are ready to break this law -- if necessary -- to achieve
that end, as it is probable that we will be charged for "promoting the use of tobacco", our office
searched without a warrant, and our materials confiscated. No problem, we have copies!
On a personal note, this writer is quite ready to be imprisoned for defending the right to smoke
-- and to smoke while conducting a social life.
I would not be the first -- or last -- to face jail for a conviction. The conviction that people must
ultimately take responsibility for their liberties in their own hands. The conviction that choice is
the only way in which a society can flourish, while the removal of choice seems to have become
the preferred sport of the state. The disturbing knowledge that there CAN be democracy without liberty, notwithstanding the widespread popular belief to the contrary.
In a society that can no longer conceive any unregulated human activity, my choice to smoke has
become a synonym for my choice for liberty, and may I be damned if I am going to give either
one up.
I hope that many others will feel the same way. After all, a law unrespectful of the dignity of all
citizens, itself does not deserve any respect.
Gian Turci
|