THE CORRUPTION OF THE ANTI-SMOKING CARTEL


ARCHIVE 11
Articles logged from December, 1999 to February 2000



ANTISMOKING PORNOGRAPHY PULLED OFF THE AIR OVER TASTE: WHAT ABOUT SCIENTIFIC FRAUD AND HATE SPEECH? Added February 16, 2000 - ANTI-SMOKING ADS PULLED OVER TASTE - Hate-mongering antitobacco pornography has been pulled off the air after complaints from the tobacco industry.

Anti-tobacco propagandist Matthew Myers, head of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said, even after the withdrawal of the ads, that the Legacy anti-smoking campaign still "is hard-hitting'' and it bears watching whether the foundation will continue in that direction. "Hopefully this is a one-time incident in which the tobacco companies demonstrate that they haven't really changed by threatening the foundation whenever it produces hard-hitting ads that put the tobacco industry in a bad light,'' he said.

The pornographic ads, designed to instigate hatred of smokers especially by minors, are divulging medical frauds and half-truths concerning the unproven health effects of smoking. The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids receives heavy money for divulging information that is as stomach-turning as it is unsubstantiated. Nevertheless, like the rest of the cartel TFK is intolerant of opposition and it has even the face to take paternalistic tones towards its intended victims.

Not only was American Legacy Foundation rebuffed by the tobacco industry for breaking its part of the agreement in the Master Settlement Agreement pact which funds it, but by AG Easley, who helped broker the settlement, and by many of the national TV networks which wouldn't accept the ads because of their bad taste.

Also please notice that Matt Myers' boss sits on the board of the American Legacy Foundation. Matt Myers' boss is Steve Schroeder, CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which supplied the big bucks for the founding and operation of Tobacco-Free Kids. So while the board of ALF votes to rescind the ads (for now), one of the board member's attack dog gets print for savaging the tobacco industry just as much as the ads did.

If this mafioso behaviour would occur in any other corporation, there would be immediate outcry, and talk of racketeering. But not when the antitobacco cartel is involved. Unfortunately, a bent-over tobacco industry has signed a deal that allows the cartel to stigmatise smokers in the same way Jews were stigmatised in Nazi Germany, using corrupt science to justify its actions.

IN VIEW OF RECENT EXPOSURE OF STUDIES MANIPULATIONS ON PASSIVE SMOKING AND LUNG CANCER, ANTI-TOBACCO CARTEL OPERATIVES DIVERT TO HEART DISEASE Added February 14, 2000 - Electronic responses to: Reanalysis of epidemiological evidence on lung cancer and passive smoking - The study published by BMJ showing once again the statistical manipulations about secondhand smoke (scroll down) has been commented by the operatives of the antitobacco cartel, but in a very low key. The cartel tries to minimise the damage. "My reaction to this paper is a big yawn," says Stanton Glantz, the man who has been exposed several times for, shall we say, "creatively interpreting" evidence on smoking.

Protected by an establishment that is endorsing systematic scientific and political frauds on the health effects of smoking, good old Stanton knows quite well that, no matter what, the fascist antitobacco agenda will continue in the face of any evidence of corruption. However, it is interesting that all of a sudden, lung cancer takes a second place to heart disease: "The real killer from secondhand smoke is heart disease, not lung cancer. Heart disease kills about 10 times more people than lung cancer. And not even the tobacco industry has contested the evidence on asthma."

Sorry Glantz, your diversions simply don't cut it. Firstly, the fact that heart disease kills more than lung cancer does not have anything to do with ETS causing either. Nice try. Second, the tobacco industry has bent over, and it will sing any tune the cartel imposes, the asthma song included. Curious how "even the tobacco industry" becomes credible when it serves your agenda of lies, Stanny boy!

Unpublished studies or not, relative risks like the ones described by Glantz are ridiculously small, and the quantification of such small risks can be affected by an immense variety and combination of concauses and even involuntary bias. Glantz knows that better than anyone else, and we leave the conclusions about honesty and integrity to the reader. About Hirschhorn, the presence of "nitrosamine metabolites (how much?) after HEAVY (how heavy?) exposure to ETS" does not mean that any dangerous treshold is reached. Ah, we forgot the "no exposure is safe exposure" BS. What is the risk from the exposure to vehicular exhaust fumes? The antitobacco cartel is not interested. It gets no cashola out of that. Wrong end of the telescope indeed, Mr. Hirschhorn! Getting people to look through the wrong end of the telescope is what the cartel does when it wants to make the gargantuan frauds on ETS appear small and remote.

THE EXPOSURE OF JUNK SCIENCE ON ETS CONTINUES Added February 13, 2000 - BRITISH REPORT SAYS RISK FROM PASSIVE SMOKING OVERSTATED - London - The British press is reporting that estimates on exposure to secondhand smoke turn out to have been exaggetated (see below). The Italian media have also reported the news extensively on February 11th.

So far, no study ever performed on passive smoking (about 40) except a minor one have shown any serious risk, but the anti-tobacco cartel and it major mouthpiece, the WHO, continue to lie about secondhand smoke dangers. Click here to see all the studies ever performed on secondhand smoking

"The Warwick University specialists estimated that some 23 earlier studies that did not link passive smoking with lung cancer may have been ignored. Researchers often average all previous findings, but the overall picture may be distorted because some reports with negative findings have not been written up in journals."

Perhaps antismoking should be added in all synonym dictionaries next to the word corruption.

GOOD NEWS: MORALITY STILL EXISTS IN THE MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT... IT IS JUST IGNORED BY THE MASS MEDIA! Added February 12, 2000 - PHYSICIANS' GROUP CRITICIZES CLINTON TOBACCO FINE PROPOSAL (CNSNews.com) - ' The Association of American Physicians Thursday criticized President Clinton's proposal to fine tobacco companies based on the number of underage smokers as a precedent for pervasive and intrusive interference with all aspects of private life.

Dr. Jane Orient, Association President, said in a statement, "Concern about health does not justify using Third Reich measures against corporations engaged in a legal business. What's next? Fining auto makers for each speeding driver, nailing Hershey for every diabetic who eats a candy bar, or gouging McDonald's for all obese people who order a Big Mac?" '

Yes doctor, that is exactly what's next. Thank you, thank you, doctor, for everything you say. Finally someone who deserves that title! The end does not justify the means - especially when the end is rotten, and the means are a threat to liberty, individuality, and freedom of choice. And physical health is not the only element of health. Actually, being physically healthy in a liberty-free world dominated by hatred, persecution and suspicion is a true assault to public health.

DOCTORS CRITICIZE CLINTON TOBACCO FINES FOR UNDERAGE SMOKERS (U.S. Newswire )

' As physicians, we find reprehensible the use of excessive government intrusion and control to force changes in behavior affecting health and well-being. Many other voluntary activities are associated with adverse health effects, some more probable and more immediate than the hazards of tobacco use. '

ENGLAND: THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS SELLS OUT TO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES Added February 12, 2000 - SMOKING IS AN ILLNESS, SAY DOCTORS - The sick and the corrupt call their opponents (or their intended victims) sick and corrupt. It is the oldest propaganda trick in the book, but it works most of the times.

This is the case of the Royal College of Physicians. By calling smokers sick, they can state that smokers need medical treatment, that is - guess what? - the smoking cessation treatments marketed by the pharmaceutical industry pulling their strings. By calling smoking an "anti-social habit," the message that smokers are the public enemy to beat is also sent.

' "Why do we allow this major cause of death to continue unregulated and uncontrolled?" asked John Britton, chair of the tobacco advisory group within the Royal College of Physicians. '

This clown and the association he represents fails to enter in the specifics, of course - and no one is calling him on it. The computer-generated deaths, the unproven causes of disease, the false cost to society, the fraudulent dangers of passive smoke - nothing matters to these social gangsters who only listen to themselves and to their pocket books, while they are supported by overtaxing governments, and by media that have decided to ignore any shred of ethic when reporting on the issue of smoking.

Let's keep on smoking - right in the face of the cartel. The cartel will be forced to show its true colours - it is already happening. And those colours are as black as the shirts of the fascist regimes they are inspired to.

"All smokers should be given nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), as patches, gum, or in other forms, on the NHS, the report recommends." Great business for the pharmaceutical gangsters, don't you think? And what if we REFUSE? Are they going to force us? Don't bet against it! We wonder if castor oil is going to be a "good complement for the good nicotine" - the one sold by the pharmaceutical industry!

THE THIEVES' POLITICAL LOBBY Added January 23 - Another proof - as if one more were needed - that the media has devolved into a government communications organ is the alacrity in which the anti-tobacco press reports any political donation from the tobacco industry to politicians.  The shrieks and cries of outrage echo shrilly about the land if that industry, fighting for its survival, exercises its Constitutionally guaranteed right to make political donations to candidates or campaigns that reflect its lawfully held views.

The media is strangely silent when the one special interest group that is most despised by the American public donates astronomical amounts of cash to politicians in the hope of increasing its obscenely bulging coffers.  The rapacious Trial Lawyers have wrought far more damage to this country than any industry.  They have perverted the rule of law into a mechanism more conducive to massive shakedowns than pursuits of justice.  By their tactics, mimicking criminal organizations, they have effected the most massive transfer of wealth and property from citizens to special interests in this country's history.

The American Tort Reform Foundation has stepped into the void and has taken over the media's function to inform.  The group has taken upon itself the daunting task of tracking the cash the lawyers pass out to their favorite politicians.  No segment of these overcompensated leaches has more cash to spread around than the sharks that shook down the tobacco industry and their consumers.  With billions to play with, the tobacco lawyers are primarily lavishing their ill-gotten gains upon Democrats and the Democratic National Committee.  They have looted smokers and now seek to expand their political influence to loot us all. 

GOVERNMENT/MEDIA COMPLEX Added January 16 - The term was coined by radio talk host Michael Savage, San Francisco radio station KSFO, to describe the unprecedented collaboration between the government and all levels of media.  In the old days - not really all that long ago - heavily smoking and drinking reporters reveled in digging out the truth from corporations and government agencies that wished to keep the people ignorant.  Today the journalists dutifully rewrite the press releases issued by the elite and rarely dig beneath the surface on any issue.

From guns to global warming, the press parrots the government as slavishly as did the Soviet Union's Pravda.  On tobacco, the press marches lockstep with the government, printing its lies and ignoring any dissent.  Never has the mainstream media been held in such low esteem.  That contempt is reflected in the declining ratings of Network News and the plummeting subscription rates of the major newspaper dailies.

Now we find that the federal government is butting into television entertainment, at the invitation of the networks.  From Salon, not a member of the Government/Media Complex, comes the disturbing tale of White House script approval for some of the networks most popular shows.

As always during this era of government merging with private institutions, the goal of the White House network collaboration is a "worthy cause".  The networks are compelled to air free Public Service Announcements on the behalf of the failed War On Drugs.  If appropriate anti-drug messages are inserted in television comedies and dramas, the networks can then eliminate the PSA's and sell the time slot at commercial rates. The effect of this deal is that flunkies at the White House are reviewing scripts and offering suggestions.

Although the focus of the Salon piece is on the War On Drugs, it doesn't take a genius to prognosticate that an arrangement between government censors and the networks involving anti-tobacco messages is a very real possibility.  From Hillary Clinton down to the goons at the American Lung Association, there is a constant harping from the totalitarians that Hollywood must hop upon the anti-tobacco bandwagon.  As Salon has uncovered, when given the chance to exchange their independence for financial gain, the media will always go for the gold. 

READER'S DIGEST: HYPOCRISY AS AN UNDERSTATEMENT Added January 30, 2000 - TRIAL LAWYERS ON TRIAL: LAWSUIT FEVER CHEATS CONSUMERS, TAINTS DEMOCRATIC PROCESS - "How would you like to make $130,000 an hour? It's little wonder that, as they pocket colossal contingency fees, America's trial lawyers say the current justice system works just fine. But as high-powered attorneys scoop up billions from tobacco settlements -- and begin their hunt for the next target industry -- Reader's Digest magazine warns it is the little guy who ultimately pays for the nation's rising tide of baseless litigation."

"A growing number of critics -- and not just corporate defendants -- contend the legal gravy train is roaring out of control. Unfortunately, trial lawyers are using their vast financial clout to influence politicians and thwart much-needed reforms."

These are excerpts from an article published in The Reader's Digest. It is interesting to notice that the Reader's Digest has been (and still is) rabidly antismoking. While we are pleased to see that articles against the disgusting abuses by the anti-tobacco lawyers make it to the Digest, we cannot help but remember that the Digest itself has substantially contributed to the propaganda against smoking, the social dislike of smokers by non-smokers, and helped to instigate the public opinion against the tobacco industry -- not to mention the relentless publication of scientific and political misinformation on this subject -- for many years.

The moral question for the Digest is: what sense does it make to systematically instigate a thief to steal and then cry foul about his wrongdoing?

MORE OUTRAGE ABOUT THE ANTITOBACCO CARTEL'S ENEMY LIST Added January 13, 2000 - WAITING TO INHALE - At the time when the outrageous use of public money to compile enemy lists became public (click here for more info), we missed this interesting article because we were taking our deserved Christmas break.

' Meanwhile, like all good enemies lists, this one does not discriminate. It indicts big shots and small fry alike. Thus you may find on it the name and address of a man in Colorado who "appears to work for a research firm that represents the tobacco industry." You may also find the name and address of a man in Sacramento who "contacted the Chino Hills, Calif., city clerk, seeking information on the sponsor of a smokefree ordinance pending in Chino Hills." Obviously it took a lot of detective work to uncover miscreants like that, and as the Los Angeles Daily News reported last week, the tax-exempt Non-Smokers Rights Foundation spent part of the $1.2 million "monitoring people who attended and spoke on tobacco issues at city council meetings in cities throughout the state." '

Scrambling to defend itself, the ANR and its apologists are making the outrageous claim that keeping tabs on and intimidating private citizens is an appropriate way to spend tax dollars. The California Department of Health Services backs up its irresponsible decision to fund the enemies list by asserting that the people of California support the Gestapo tactics of the Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights. Such slander heaped on the citizens of California is yet one more proof that the Health Department's Tobacco Control Section must undergo a complete and independent audit. The undemocratic activities of the ANR and its Public Health patrons are a blight that must be eradicated.

Incidentally, so far no answer to the letter written by our CEO Gian Turci to Americans for Non-Smokers Rights Foundation. Actually, we don't expect an answer, for they CANNOT answer without reveling ther antitobacco cartel's frauds and arrogance.

PROFILE OF A FAMOUS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ANTITOBACCO CARTEL: DOKTOR KROOK, .CON Added January 10, 2000 - THE FOX IN 'CHICK' KOOP - So, Doktor Koop, such champion of the war against tobacco; such spreader of junk science and false information using his [past] reputation to bambloozle America on a corrupt agenda. A man of such integrity; he was totally outraged at the corruption of the tobacco industry.

Wake up, America: Doktor Koop is a con artist, and that's why he has embraced antitobacco in a first place. Honest people do not embrace antitobacco unless they are either dumb or uninformed. Doktor Koop is neither. He got rich thumbing his nose at those who gave him trust.

Here is an excerpt from this unflattering article published by the Washington Post.

" ..They also accuse him of acting as a front for chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturers. In 1999 testimony before Congress, Koop played down health groups' concerns that health care workers and some patients were being sickened by allergies to latex surgical gloves, saying calls for bans on the gloves' use bordered on "hysteria." He pressed a government official to soften a warning about use of the gloves as well. In both cases, Koop failed to disclose that he had once received $650,000 in consulting fees from a company that manufactures the gloves. "

Oops! The ban on gloves is hysteria, huh, Evy? We are ready to bet any money there is more scientific substance behind the glove scare than there is behind the ETS one. And how much payola did Doktor Koop get from the pharmaceutical industry to LIE about the health effects of tobacco while promoting smoking cessation devices?! What is your price to speak the truth, doctor?

HOW TRIAL LAWYERS MAINTAIN THEIR POLITICAL POWER WHILE LAUGHING AT THEIR VICTIMS ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK Added January 8, 2000 - THEY SAY THEY REPRESENT "THE LITTLE GUY." BUT WHO POCKETS THOSE COLOSSAL FEES? - ' At his office in Pensacola, Fla., attorney Fredric G. Levin discusses campaign contributions with disarming candor. "It is nothing for this law firm to pay $200,000, $300,000 a year toward political campaigns," he says. "And that was before the tobacco money." Levin smiles, then begins to laugh. Buoyed by the tens of billions in fees they expect to receive from the autumn 1998 settlement between the states and the tobacco industry, trial lawyers such as Levin will no doubt be spending more in the future on the political process than they already are. And that's plenty. '

Antitobacco and its corrupt accomplices in the medical profession have paved the way for these sharks to rob citizens and private industry while controlling politics. Is any fool out there who thinks that democracy is still alive in America?

BRITISH COLUMBIA'S WCB: BC GOVERNMENT GIVES GREEN LIGHT TO CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR -- AS LONG AS IT IS AGAINST SMOKERS Added December 16, 1999 - SMOKING RESTRAINTS EXTENDED

- The criminal British Columbia government continues its persecution of smokers based on the totally fraudulent ETS "evidence" on the dangers of passive smoking. Effective January 1st, 2000, "Health-care workers must refuse to treat clients who are smoking in their own homes, and cleaning staff and food-servers are not allowed to enter a smoker's hotel room under new Workers' Compensation Board regulations."

Don't you love the title? Smoking "restraints"! Letting patients suffer and even die if they are smokers is quite OK for these Canadian criminals. When will these bastards decide to tattoo smokers? Is any Nazi (health or otherwise) disagreeing with that approach? How can anyone with an ounce of humanity, let alone integrity, be indifferent to this? When will the citizens, business people, and smokers themselves understand that it is useless to argue with totalitarians who, like all fascists, only understand force, and start cleaning up their house from the anti-tobacco scum?

Since THERE IS NO DANGER IN SECONDHAND SMOKING, the only remaining reason is the true reason: the state is engaged in persecution activities against human rights. The BC government is responsible for instigation of hatred and contiuous fraud of its citizens. It is the duty of any decent citizen to destroy anti-tobacco. Canadians must react forcefully against a criminal government that exercise indirect violence to control the behaviour of citizens it does not approve of, but it extorts money from.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the anti-tobacco cartel at work. State-endorsed terror, fraud, intimidation, even probable homicide through institutionalised neglect. Do you like what you see? If not, when are you going to rebel, and stop deserving what you get?

THE HEROES OF THE ANTI-TOBACCO CARTEL: HEALTH NAZIS LOVE WIGAND, AND HERE IS WHY Added December 15, 1999 - 'CERTAIN EVENTS HAVE BEEN FICTIONALIZED'

- Don't be fooled by the title of this article. What the National Post says about the new Disney's here is real - and the antismoking bastards know that too, starting from Canada Health Minister Alan Rock down to the last anti-tobacco lackey.

The reality is even more down to earth than this excellent article describes - though that is still hard to accept, unfortunately, for too many people: those who are actively involved in antismoking campaigns are criminals of the like of the real hero of The Insider. The lie, cheat, falsify, and they take advantage of the innocent. When proven to be liars, they simply lie more and more, and laugh at those who naively still believe they can prove their wrongdoing. Frankly, they don't care at all if they are proven to be liars, as long as they can hold on to power. This scale of perverted values goes so far beneath the illegal, it paradoxically becomes even accepted by some.

It is very hard for a nation to believe and accept that it has criminals at the helm. It was impossible for Italy, Germany, and Spain to believe the same 60 years ago. But in the last 30 years anti-tobacco has managed to pervert science to the point that laughable unreliable procedures such as epidemiological self-reporting, fraudulent manipulation of databases and methodologies (databases are ofthe proprietary, and not even accessible for public scrutiny), corruption of scientists to produce "creative" associations between tobacco and disease have gradually become the foundations for public policy - and for a mockery of science.

No one questions the "associations" between tobacco and disease because they are the medical fraud at the basis of the political fraud. The inescapable reality is that those who do not question antismoking pseudo-science are either ignorant, gullible imbeciles, or - much more commonly - simply corrupt.

Why then should we be disgusted by The Insider? It is what anti-tobacco is. It is what certain nations have become - and not just as far as smoking is concerned.

CHILDREN'S ANTI-TOBACCO "EDUCATION" IS JUST ONE MANIFESTATION OF SOCIAL DECAY Added December 11, 1999 - THE DELIBERATE DUMBING DOWN OF AMERICA - Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt has put together the most formidable and practical compilation of documentation describing the well-planned "deliberate dumbing down" of American children by their education system. Anyone who has had any lingering hope that what the educators have been doing is a result of error, accident, or stupidity will be shocked by the way American social engineers have systematically gone about destroying the intellect of millions of American children for the purpose of leading the American people into a socialist world government controlled by behavioral and social scientists.

This mammoth book is the size of a large city phone book: 462 pages of documentation, 205 pages of appendices, and a 48-page Index. See See FORCES' bookcase.

THE DIRTY MANEUVRES OF THE ANTI-TOBACCO CARTEL ARE COMING TO THE SURFACE Added December 10, 1999 - LAWYERS BACK N.C. JUDGE ON ANTI-SMOKING GROUP'S 'HIT' LIST - Those who talk so much about law and authority are usually the ones who have the greatest contempt of both when it does not serve their purposes. This is certainly the case of the anti-tobacco cartel and one of its worst and most adamant representatives, the Americans for Nonsmokers Rights Foundation.

"Lawyers in North Carolina leapt to the defense yesterday of U.S. District Judge William Osteen, who was targeted by an anti-smoking group in California that used tax dollars to compile an ''enemies list'' that included the judge."

" Newspapers in California reported this week that the Americans for Nonsmokers Rights Foundation, a nonprofit group, has received more than $1.2 million since 1995 in proceeds from a state tax of 25 cents a pack on cigarettes. The group is reported to have used the money to compile an ''enemies list'' that aimed to expose front groups that the tobacco industry uses to fight tobacco-control programs. "

"The list included Osteen, a judge since 1991 for the Middle District of North Carolina who issued a ruling last year that overturned a federal report on second-hand tobacco smoke. "

" The money comes through Proposition 99, which was enacted by California voters in 1988 to pay for advertising campaigns to help persuade children and others not to smoke. "

We don't think that there is much to add. Just throw them in jail where they belong...

VERY WELCOME NEWS Added December 8, 1999 - WHEN SCIENTISTS GO BAD - A new species of detective is emerging to pursue and expose cheats who cut corners in their research or commit outright fraud.

This is really welcome news for smokers. If this group wants to keep busy, we can address them to the anti-smoking cartel "studies" on tobacco-related disease, ETS, and all the other fraudulent permutations of junk science that are the backbone of the "evidence" against tobacco and its users.

This group would have to work overtime and then some! May we recommend that prisons of adequate crowd capacity are built first?

ANTI-SMOKING ENEMIES LIST added December 8, 1999 - "Taxpayers are actually financing an abuse of government power."   Such a hit list smacks of "Gestapo tactics".

By accusing the Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights of adopting Nazi tactics, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association has performed a valuable public service for California residents.  The nationally known group, as well as other organizations, are appalled that the ANR, a million dollar plus recipient of the Proposition 99 tobacco tax, is using the public's money to compile an enemies list to silence its critics.  Individuals who oppose local smoking bans, expose anti-tobacco junk science or point out the wanton waste inherent in anti-tobacco education are likely to appear on the ANR's hit list which also includes at least one federal judge.

Proposition 99, passed in 1988, transfers money from California consumers into the coffers of a multitude of special interest organizations to "educate" the population on the so-called dangers of smoking.  To date, this transfer scheme as netted the anti-tobacco cartel and its minions over $5-billion dollars.  To safeguard its share of the loot, the ANR intimidates, bullies and threatens all who dare question any aspect of California's wasteful and abusive anti-tobacco programs.

Earlier this year the ANR caused a flap by refusing to remove from its Internet site a scurrilous smear of two individuals who dared question the computation of smoking morbidity rates.  Confirming the suspicions of those who question its ethics, the ANR claimed that its political credibility trumped the facts.  Since the ANR holds tax-exempt status and receives taxpayer funding, the brazen admission of a political agenda should activate red flags at the Internal Revenue Service.

The Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights was founded by Stanton Glantz, the mechanical engineer turned Professor of Medicine, and faithfully mimics that master of statistical manipulation.  His control of the group is evidenced by Director Julia Carol mindlessly echoing his lame "mosquito abatement" analogy when caught in an impropriety.  Glantz himself was removed from the Proposition 99 slush fund several years ago for compiling his own enemies list of California politicians who had the guts and integrity to protest the misuse of taxpayer funding.  Lately he has been smearing the Governor of Florida for curtailing the abuses of that state's anti-tobacco "education" program.

A thorough audit of the entire Proposition 99 program is long overdue.  With almost no state oversight the program is riddled with cronyism, misuse of taxpayer funds and outright corruption.   Presented with the evidence, Californians are very unlikely to continue their support for a program that has completely deteriorated from what they voted for 11 years ago.

WHEN THEFT IS EASY (AND STATE SANCTIONED), THIEVES COME OUT OF THE WOODS - (Added December 6, 1999) - TOBACCO'S BIG LOSS SETS A BAD PRECEDENT - ' The public cheered when government took on Big Tobacco and won a year ago this week. But it's time for the cheering to stop, because that victory has made some in government greedy to form another wolf pack and seek more red meat.

Milwaukee a case in point. Indeed, Milwaukee's city attorney in October described a possible lawsuit against lead-paint manufacturers as "problematic." Among the difficulties were proving which manufacturer's paint caused which victim's harm, and proving that victims were harmed by paint rather than by some other source of lead encountered in everyday life.

Still, Milwaukee's city council persisted. It decided to follow the approach used against tobacco companies by seeking out a private law firm to represent it on a contingency-fee basis. Thus, the lawsuit will cost Milwaukee virtually nothing and could provide many millions of dollars if it succeeds.

What's in it for the private law firm, which may not be paid if the suit fails? '

This is yet another interesting article we recommend for reading. One important thing, however, must be highlighted.

The "public" did not cheer when looters and liars won on the tobacco industry last year. Those who cheered were the uninformed, the hysterical, the hateful, and all those who got instigated by those corrupt media that sold themselves ethically and intellectually to outright frauds and put up an anti-tobacco show. Those media, in other words, that have proven to be so socially irresponsible as to promote hysteria instead of attempting to tone it down. Whether their name is CBS, BBC, or CNN for example, those media have been - and are - accessories to the implementation of scientific/statistical frauds, as it is clear that their zeal about anti-tobacco greatly exceeds their duty to report. In these times of "creative lawsuits" perhaps some intelligent lawyer could find a way to give the anti-tobacco cartel and its media minions an overdose of their own poisonous medicine.

UNPROVEN THEORY, ENOUGH SAID - (added December 5) - A recent story from The San Francisco Chronicle regarding yet another junk study created by the anti-tobacco cartel is noteworthy in that the reporter stepped ever so slightly out of the anti-smoking media rut and called a spade a spade by rightly labeling the basic contention of the study an "unproven theory". The story is also noteworthy for reporting the actual motive anti-tobacco researchers have for cranking out their endless supply of endlessly debunked studies: It's the money, stupid. Noting that many studies don't support the "unproven theory", a key researcher states that more studies are needed.

The unproven theory, discussed in the story, is that women are more vulnerable to "cancer-causing substances in tobacco smoke". The theory is unproven and, despite the billions of dollars flushed down the anti-tobacco toilet, likely to remain unproven since there are no substances in tobacco smoke that have ever been proved to cause cancer. The search for this Holy Grail has enriched thousands of anti-tobacco stooges and goons for over three decades and will continue until the thugs are prosecuted for fraud.

The researchers from the University of California - San Francisco, home to Stanton Glantz, the granddaddy of statistical manipulation, attempt to cover all bases by dragging in the discredited notion that secondhand smoke also is harder on women than men. As there is no evidence that tobacco smoke contains "cancer-causing substances", it is a double absurdity to lie to the public that secondhand smoke causes cancer.

Splendid article by the national post says it all: criminals like (and hire) other criminals. What else to expect from an anti-tobacco government? - Added December 3, 1999 - BEHIND THE SCENES OF THE INSIDER - Many have spoken against anti-tobacco gangster Jeffrey Wigand, recently hired by other anti-tobacco gangster, no less than Alan Rock, Health Minister of Canada. Do you think we are ranting? Not at all. Look at the facts.

Here is the section dedicated to the pathetic Insider movie saga. We have just added the article of the National Post. But don't forget to read the rest. Wingand is a true scum, apparently complete with criminal record, including physical abuse. And he fits perfectly with the Canadian scum that has hired him, as well as the Disney one that, using to perfection the Liberal scale of values, has made a hero out of a petty criminal.

THE GREAT DISTORTION (Added December 2, 1999) - THE SMOKING EPIDEMIC: DEATH AND SICKNESS AMONG AUSTRALIAN SMOKERS - This paper actually belongs to The Evidence - Tobacco-Attributed Deaths, and it has been posted in that section of our site as well. The paper, however, covers more than the statistical frauds about the so-called "tobacco-related" deaths.

This authoritative paper concerns also the Great Anti-Smoking Scientific Fraud in general. Year after year, fraud after fraud, the anti-tobacco cartel has managed to construct such a complex and intertwined building of misinformation that ranges from "creative interpretation" to outright fraud, it is now virtually impossible to demolish it without huge analysis that the masses have neither the time nor the qualifications to understand.

This is the colossal problem facing those who are dedicated to the exposure of the anti-tobacco frauds. How is it possible to demonstrate to the layperson decades of systematic scientific deceit and sloppy, biased work? Politicians and lay people are intimidated by the massive amount of information created by the anti-tobacco cartel and most of them accept it on the basis of "faith," and as confirmation of the popular and undefined "smoking is no good for you" folklore.

Nevertheless, starting with the 1964 Surgeon General Report, we have nothing but speculations (the wildest the better) that have been insufficiently challenged and, at first, have been ignored by mass-media. That is turn has given the cartel plenty of time to consolidate those lies, and let them become the "proof" upon which more and more lies and speculations were (and are continuously) built.

It may well be that smoking is responsible for some disease. But when faced with such massive amounts of deception by the very establishment that cannot actually prove just ONE of the claims in any orthodox scientific way except with the use of speculative epidemiology, it is difficult to detect the shreds of truth that may lay in the enmeshed fabric of lies.


> BACK TO FORCES MAIN PAGE <