ARTICLES
FROM OTHER SOURCES

"The unfiltered cigarettes are shaped like marijuana joints and come in a variety of scents that hide the harsh taste of the tobacco," says the anti-smoking operative who has written this article. In reality, scent usually blends beautifully with the already delicious taste of straight tobacco, leaving a great taste in the mouth even after smoking. Scented tobacco is common among pipe smokers, and even most non-smokers appreciate the aroma it leaves behind. One of the positive side effects of smoking is that it actually fights bad breath. Those who have paid attention (it is often hard not to) have noticed that very often the breath of non-smokers is hard to withstand and, unfortunately, it is quite easy to detect what they have digested. Tobacco in general takes care of that problem, but scented tobacco simply does a superlative job. So, next time you are approaching someone close-up, be kind: have a cigarette (better if scented) a few minutes before the encounter, or even during it. While making a silent statement, you'll do everybody a favour. Bad breath is a big problem in all cases, but it is a true switch-off in romantic encounters… chewing gum simply does not do the trick - especially the one that has been turned into a nicotine delivery device! Not so. As a matter of facts, never before these times the health
risks of smoking have been fuzzier. Thanks to the mass-production of
junk science on this topic, now more than ever we are unable to assess
the real dangers, if any, from the enjoyment of tobacco. With science
on the leash of politics, its credibility is lost, and with it we have
lost the most reliable tool we had. Logic and common sense is all we
have left to help us navigate a sea of lies and frauds where,
occasionally, a buoy of truth can be sighted, slowly floating away
beyond the horizon.
The endorsement of lies and repression through taxation and
lawsuits as a tool to bend the will and coerce the behaviour of the
physical or corporate individual is also typical of the socialist
mentality, for the end always justifies the means. Sentences such as "the
needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" originally
meant to express democracy and social progress. But in the hands of
the Socialist paternalists that is simply reduced to this: the needs
(and choices) of the few are insignificant and have no relevance to
the direction and goals of the "many", thus they have to be
ignored and eliminated through taxation, regulation
and prohibition.
This article by Sheldon Richman gives historical reasons
why neither the gun nor the tobacco industry can be held responsible
for their alleged "crimes," and how the verdicts of certain
juries are the sad representation of the social and political
regression of the United States.
"If the trend is not stopped, no business or industry will
be safe, they say. Gun companies appear to be the next target. Who
knows what industries are on the list after them?" The
answer to that question is quite simple: any industry that has large
sums of money to be extorted, and that can be demonstrated, through
the use of junk science, to be harmful to health -- in one sentence,
potentially every industry.
Of course, the Utah Solicitor General Jim Soper, noticeable
representative of the looting industry, dismisses the concern:
"Tobacco companies used cigarettes as a way to sell
nicotine, an addictive drug," he said.
Setting aside the fact that nicotine is as addictive as Burger King
hamburgers, even in the assumption that the addiction is real, how
come the looting industry is not going after the pharmaceutical
industry, distributing high-power nicotine under the guise of smoking
cessation devices?
This seems to be a mystery that only crooks can explain.
The fact that nicotine-deprived pathetic individuals like Clive
Bates -- ASH again -- argue that the white on the underpants is not exactly
the tone of white used by the Red Cross as a backgroung for its famous
symbol is perfectly in tune with the Clintonian contempt for anything
decent and real. But Clinton is no fool: he keeps his brain sharp by
smoking cigars!
And the fury of the Red Cross is more than justified. This is what
happens when people who are making a living out of deceit and frauds
get to sit on the throne of power: they immediately make it stink like
a toilette.
What is sad and depressing is that the British Medical Association
has fallen so low as to endorse the lies and methods of anti-tobacco.
Who can believe in the medical establishment anymore?
But guys, don't get too depressed. Light up a cigarette and think
of this: what woman could resist the seduction of a smoker who has a
Red Cross on his crotch? First of all, the so-called "health experts"
never expected higher prices to reduce smoking since they would never
endorse a scheme that would bring their gravy train to a rude halt.
Secondly, increased profits for the major cigarette manufacturers are
a prime component of the settlement. Tobacco Settlement price
increases will not affect smoking rates one iota.
That people won't be deterred from a pleasurable activity
by busybodies and monopolies shouldn't surprise anyone who has the
slightest familiarity with human nature. The purpose of the settlement
has always been the enrichment of the elite at the expense of
America's working class. Smoking will continue as always and, in fact,
may increase due to the nico-nazis. As Norman Kjono, FORCES
contributor, has often noted, Anti-Tobacco (as well as lawyers and
politicians) are the best friends Joe Camel ever had.
' Aware of the large number of Spaniards who smoke, Iberia
published suggestions to help them. It recommended smokers drink
non-alcoholic drinks and take their mind off cigarettes by watching a
film, reading or resting.
"When faced with the irresistible desire to smoke, breathe
deeply, filling the abdomen then breathe out very slowly," the
pamphlet said. "You can also concentrate on the second hand of
your watch and wait until a half minute goes by..." ' Incorrect Iberia, because:
Smokers simply have to become an active problem, and
create physical troubles to make their rights respected.
As the bureaucrats of Iberia state themselves in obtuse
puzzlement: "[Iberia] had not had problems earlier when
it banned smoking on domestic flights under 90 minutes."
It follows that if they had troubles the ban would not have
come. It also follows that it is time to make trouble. "Cigarette smokers past and present are asking New
York's highest court to reinstate their consumer fraud claims
against five major tobacco companies, a step that would create the
largest class action in the state's history. Since the plaintiffs
are seeking recovery only of money spent to buy cigarettes, not
damages for personal injury or emotional distress caused by smoking
or addiction, they say class actions offer the only realistic avenue
for them to pursue redress against the tobacco industry."
We have very few comments, as the story is self-denigrating...
this is getting so sorry. What a bunch of greedy lawyers they have
in the US! Do you suppose the reimbursement would exclude Fed and
State excise taxes? Won't amount to much if it does! "I have never been bought," he said. "I
cannot be bought. I am an icon, and I have a reputation for honesty
and integrity, and let the chips fall where they may."
We don't see anything wrong in making money from a website per
se. Making money is certainly not a sin. Dr. Koop's sins are of
different nature: he is an egomaniac, a promoter and endorser of
junk science on tobacco and other health issues, an exploiter and
instigator of the persecution of smokers, and a paternalist who has
taken upon himself the task of telling people what to do. Haven't we heard this before? State-financed health fascism at
work again. "A healthy citizen is an asset to the state."
"Those who do not care to be healthy are enemies of the state,
and deserve punishment." Guess who spoke these words in the
first half of the 20th century.
Fat is next. We can't wait to see how the anti-smoker tactics are
brought into play. This persecution could get really ugly, for
smokers can become closet smokers and hide, but fat people cannot
even hide. This makes eaters even easier targets than smokers.
At first, "leaning out" will be an "encouraged
option" as were quit-smoking programs in the past. Soon, those
who "do not comply" will be branded as anti-social,
cost-to-society individuals, worthy of social marginalization. Junk
science, in the meantime, will mass-produce epidemiological
"associations" creating "links" with disease,
behaviour, moral, and so on, while grant-fuelled Ph.D.s will babble
about statistics and costs to society with authoritative arrogance,
and enjoy full attention by the media.
So now those fat antismokers who support the persecution of
tobacco users, and believe in the junk science about it, are
themselves about to have a taste of their own medicine. What goes
around comes around.
FORCES proposes that John Banzaff of ASH, fatty par
excellence, be the first example to be set by the Motherland
for disciplinary action.
A few more observations, if we may. The article does not mention
that last year the treshold for obesity was reduced to prepare the
grounds for the new persecution.
Also, notice how the word "companies" seems to have
replaced the word "society," and how, once again, the will
and the choice of the targets is not even taken into consideration;
how only those who agree with this new conditioning are given voice
by the media. Those who like to eat, like those who like to smoke,
will no longer be given a dissenting voice, for they are no longer
allowed to like themselves as they are. Thus their opinion does not
matter, anyway. The decision is a victory for cigarette makers in a class action
lawsuit that had, until yesterday, been considered a potentially
lethal danger. Analysts had predicted that some of the smaller
players in the industry might have been forced to file for
bankruptcy had they been been slapped with a gigantic, one-time
verdict," But this is more than just a victory for Big Tobacco. This is a
victory for justice and common sense; we all know that the so-called
"tobacvco-related diseases" are multi-factorial diseases,
sometimes with hundreds of co-factors. This is a victory over
anti-tobacco -- an industry existing for the sole purpose of looting
one of the economic engines of society, while misinforming the
public about tobacco and its users.
We'll certainly light up a cigar today... or, in this case, a
cigarette! Oakland's latest smoke screen to con the voters is to
outlaw discount cigarette outlets. Although there are no laws on the
book prohibiting such stores, the City Council has forbidden
"Cigarettes Cheaper!" from opening an outlet in one of the
few upscale neighborhoods in Oakland.
What makes this story different is that "Cigarettes
Cheaper!" has caught onto the strange fact that anti-tobacco
equals ultra elite left-wing politics. The so-call progressive City
Council is in a dither that poor people are flocking to discount
cigarette stores in order to find the best deals in this era of
confiscatory taxation. In Oakland poor people tend to be minorities
and "Cigarettes Cheaper!" has hit the nail on the head by
noting the opposition to its store in Rockridge boils down to the
discomfort that the residents would feel if "different looking
people" flocked to their white neighborhood. "Cigarettes
Cheaper!" is tackling the anti-poor and anti-workingclass
policies of the anti-tobacco political elite head on.
And on and on it goes. This wonderful article by San
Francisco Chronicle columnist Adair Lara highlights the endless
litany of complaints Americans are subject to from the loud mouths
who know the way to perfection and are damn sure that the rest of us
toe the mark. This article is a follow up to an earlier
piece in the same vein that elicited a flood of personal horror
stories from her readers.
Although only one nasty incident concerning smoking is
related, the two articles provide clues as to why smokers find
themselves in such a deplorable condition. We have all let the
cranky people set the rules for social interaction. These articles
lack the inspiring examples of three FORCES members who didn't back
down when faced with the ugliness of the anti-smoker whiner.
One member was smoking a cigarette while standing on the
street. A man paused near him, smiled condescendingly and said,
"You shouldn't be smoking, it's unhealthy." The reply from
the FORCES member to the impudent stranger is unprintable and the
lecture that followed ensured that the busybody will not accost
smokers anytime soon.
In a coffee shop, out on the patio another FORCES member
was confronted with a hand waver who dared to ask him to direct his
smoke elsewhere. The whiner was allergic to smoke he claimed. The
FORCES member loudly said, "Go inside. Do you think I'd be out
here if I could smoke in there?" He then launched into the
reason that tobacco smoke can never be blamed for causing allergies.
The complainer was driven from the patio.
Finally, in a popular bar, a FORCES member was ordered by
three louts to go to the back of the establishment to smoke. Without
a word, the member approached the bouncer, related the incident and
the whiniest nagger was booted out of the bar via the front door
festooned with a No Smoking sign. |