ARTICLES
FROM OTHER SOURCES

"If anyone knows about harmful fiction, it is Brown & Williamson. Despite all evidence to the contrary, the company insisted for more than three decades that smoking isn't addictive and doesn't cause cancer." That's right. IF and once science will be able to prove the genesis of cancer, and it will be PROVEN that is CAUSED by the use of tobacco, then those charges will apply. Until then, they will not -- in the face of all lies and propaganda of the anti-tobacco cartel. As far as the addictiveness of nicotine is concerned, well, we will not waste much time on that one other than appropriately raising our middle finger, for that's all that statement is worth. We will only say that the selectively cut out quote by the bozo who wrote the article ("We are, then, in the business of selling nicotine, an addictive drug effective in the release of stress mechanisms") refers to an almost ironical conclusion by B&W to a set of forced-upon conclusions by the incipient anti-tobacco cartel of the time. The only serious part about that statement is that nicotine truly relieves stress. This alone is an example of how the anti-tobacco cartel and its minions distort information to cheat the public. The most irritating part of this article, however, is the presumption that those who are attacked by slander don't have the moral (or legal?) right to either dispute the charges or defend themselves -- if they are the tobacco industry today, or God knows what other target industry tomorrow. "By flexing its intimidating legal muscles, the tobacco giant is repeating the very behavior that the movie attacks." It is ironic that anti-tobacco - the supreme master of intimidation, propaganda, and legal muscle-flexing - has the rotten face to DARE accusing of intimidation those who are the victims of it. That is not just an insult do decency and common sense, but a clear indicator of the fascist arrogance of a cartel of people that is endangering freedom of choice and expression in the entire planet. In our firm opinion, the tobacco industry has indeed done quite a poor job in "flexing its intimidating legal muscles"; if it didn't, we would see quite a lot of the anti-tobacco cartel "scientists" and operatives rotting in jail where they belong, and we would live in a much better world. The moral of the story is only one, and it is not the tobacco firm that misses it: if you are on the right side of power you can lie, falsify, slander, abuse and torment -- and you'll be a self-appointed hero. If you are on the wrong side of power, you'll be stoned no matter what. And you'll be stoned even more if you try to rightfully defend yourself, for you are expected to be standing still, and be the remorseful victim of persecution for something others have unilaterally established that you've done wrong. "Before the fall of Communism, I and many others believed that
the Communist government was lying about the United States of America.
We thought all its warnings about America were simply propaganda. And
from 1989 to 1993, I was a democratic activist. That was before I
understood the true work of the I.M.F. or the World Bank or the
transnational corporations and their policy of expansion. We fell for
the seductive talk about democracy and openness. Now 10 years later, I
wish we hadn't." The I.M.F. and the World Bank
are
"partners" of the WHO, and also bring US-made
anti-tobacco, and through it, more political arm-twisting and control
by the predatory pharmaceutical multinationals, Blagovesta Doncheva!
The WHO is now the American syringe used to inject that social poison
in Bulgaria too. And as it happens in the US, reciprocal hatred and
mistrust will exist between those who smoke and those who don't,
adding to the tribulation of your people. Those who were once friends
and tolerant of each other will be enemies. Smoking in itself may be
menial, but anti-smoking certainly is not, for it is the result of a
madness that knows no boundaries and restraints -- and all for the
mighty dollar.
The seductive talk of anti-tobacco, the empty promises of health
and lower Medicare cost, the pharmaceutical industry singing the
siren's song between its fangs will seduce and corrupt your government
even more. And the WHO, like all invaders, will bring its friends to
your home just to "save lives in amity and health" --
whether you like it or not. They are right. An ordinary individual has almost no chance of
being heard in opposition to well-funded lobbyists and super-rich
individuals. But they are wrong to believe that the situation is
hopeless.
Conservatives and libertarians especially have a difficult time
organizing because they both tend to be individualistic. Nevertheless,
if they wish to effect change, they are going to have to change and
learn how to organize people around key issues." Sent home on her school bus -- crying hysterically, the parents say
-- she was found by her mother that afternoon, dead by suicide in
their basement." These are the appalling consequences of anti-tobacco -- the
consequences of hatred against smokers stimulated by an
unrelenting, criminal campaign of unpunished frauds that
divides society, persecutes individuals -- and kills innocent victims.
Students who are punished for smoking are the victims of injustice
and oppression by a new form of perversion against those who are most
vulnerable. While we are not condoning smoking by the youth, we are
not condemning it either - if condemning means treating young people
as if they were criminals. Smoking does not hurt others and it seldom
hurts even the smoker.
American schools and universities have become ovens in which fraud
and misinformation on tobacco is cooked and force-fed into innocent
mouths. But worse yet, these institutions have become a pressure
cooker where anti-social behaviour is stimulated through propaganda,
repression, oppression, and punishment, showing the abysmal failure of
a generation, and a system, that has lost all the intelligence and the
moral standing necessary to deal with social matters, and it can only
use fraud, force, and intimidation to accomplish its goals. This
system has replaced parents with institutionalised behaviour
"modification", the contempt for snitching with toll-free
snitch lines, classic education with health garbage, and
the teaching of Christian compassion with hatred for those
who are different, while instigating disrespect for parents who do not
comply with the fascist heath doctrines. So much for "In God
we trust": God wrote only Ten Laws.
"Tamijane had told her parents that she had tried
smoking," says a friend.
``I emphasised to her, don't do it. If you smoke and you get caught
you not going to be able to do sports any more ... She adamantly told
me she was never going to smoke again.'' FEAR is used to prevent the rightful and normal
experimentation and discovery by the youth that is not sanctioned by
the rotten state agenda. PUNISHMENT is used against the
exercise of one's human RIGHT to experiment with a legal
product. Health propaganda, renamed "education", is imposed
on students who had better not disagree with the party line even if
they know they are hearing lies -- or the consequences are quite
heavily felt.
The Third Reich could not have done a better job.
One outfit has managed to combine grandstanding with fascism in support of the pharmaceutical industry. Cartel stooge Christine Fenlon, perhaps a misspelling of Felon, heads a drug industry front group called Pharmacy Partnership that wants to ban tobacco products from drug stores so that the overpriced and ineffective nicotine delivery devices manufactured by Big Pharmaceutical will not have to share the shelves with the real stuff. The tobacco tax that funds thugs like Christine Fenlon was never meant to be used to coerce businesses, lobby for laws or promote hate. With absolutely no oversight by the legislature, the tobacco tax junkies are running amok and imposing their agenda of smothering control on a citizenry that never foresaw what was coming. The reasons are clear -- and logical: if we have to make people
believe that smoking is the father of all evil, how can we possibly
lie about its negative effects and have research showing that there
are positive health effects? We need to suppress research in
favour of political and scientific frauds, and bury the
studies that showed that smoking can be good for you.
That seems logical to us. If we were medical and political
gangsters -- and paid handsomely to boot -- who knows, we would
probably do the same thing!…
-- Naah! "Without even setting foot in a courtroom, lawyers Russ
and Maury Herman have frightened a fortune out of the health insurance
industry. The brothers and law partners have created a "national
mega-firm," linking lawyers across the country to sue HMOs for a
variety of alleged frauds."
Why not? The health insurance industry has been instrumental in the
popularization of anti-tobacco frauds (such as disease attribution)
that have no foundation in reality.
They have used fabricated "risks" of smoking to force money
out of smokers through higher health insurance rates, and influenced
employers to fire/not hire smokers because "they cost more".
They mostly used lawyers to accomplish all that.
Well, now it is time to get a taste of their own medicine. Those
who use sharks to eat other people tend to forget that they are people
too - and sharks will eat them eventually. Of course, ABC had to throw in a little bit of anti-tobacco
"creativity" to be politically correct: God forbid, in fact,
that this poll could be ever misunderstood as an absolution of
smoking! So, in the icon on the left we can see a little sub-header:
"No Sympathy for Smokers" -- implicitly, those dirty,
filthy sub-humans who had the disgrace to make a now
politically incorrect choice 30 years ago, when intelligence was much
bigger and bureaucracy much smaller. The poll shows that 60% of
"the people" thinks that cigarette makers should not pay for
the disease that the anti-tobacco cartel says are attributable to
smoking - no proof necessary, of course.
Two small details that ABC seems to neglect are:
"We are working with business to use technology, research and
market incentives to meet national goals," Clinton told the
Economic Club of Detroit in February. "Some have called this
political philosophy the third way."
What Clinton means by this gobbledygook is that Big Business will
own the economy (as under capitalism), while Big Government runs it
(as under socialism). ' One outfit has managed to combine grandstanding with
fascism in support of the pharmaceutical industry. Cartel stooge
Christine Fenlon, perhaps a misspelling of Felon, heads a drug
industry front group called Pharmacy Partnership that wants to ban
tobacco products from drug stores so that the overpriced and
ineffective nicotine delivery devices manufactured by Big
Pharmaceutical will not have to share the shelves with the real stuff.
The tobacco tax that funds thugs like Christine Fenlon was
never meant to be used to coerce businesses, lobby for laws or promote
hate. With absolutely no oversight by the legislature, the tobacco tax
junkies are running amok and imposing their agenda of smothering
control on a citizenry that never foresaw what was coming.
"…The Martins are seeking more than $75,000 in
damages." Just 75,000 dollars. This appears to be what the life of a young
smoker is worth in America. Even if they lose, the anti-tobacco
criminals are getting away for cheap. Criminal charges are not
mentioned at all.
What the hell, after all, she was just a young smoker… ' I'm sure Taku Ronsman doesn't think of herself as an advocate
of totalitarianism. She's certainly too nice a person to serve in the
Thought Police or the KGB. But my Merriam-Webster paperback dictionary
defines totalitarian as "of or relating to a political regime
based on subordination of the individual to the state and strict
control of all aspects of life, especially by coercive measures."
So, as sweet as she appears on the surface, I must sadly conclude that
Ms. Ronsman believes the state should control people's lives, by force
of law if necessary.'
'Our government was not formed to prevent citizens from having bad
habits. In fact, it was formed to prevent government tyranny.
Oppressive taxation of smokers, forcing them out in the cold, and
micromanagement of private lives and businesses sure sound like
tyranny to me. This is the land of the free. If you hate a little
smoke that much, there are many countries where people who irritate
you can be sent to gulags. Maybe you can find a home there.' Corporal punishment for smoking a cigarette. Violence is
quite OK, it appears, when administered against young tobacco smokers
by the school -- but if parents administer it to their own children,
they can face jail. Such is the moral inversion of these
communist and "progressive" antismoking times, and of the
criminals behind them!
Get your hands off the youth, you fanatic child molesters!
Let the youth enjoy the right to smoke when chosen, and teach
instead some REAL EDUCATION, for a change. The US already has
one of the lowest average academic levels in the western world. This
is quite a negative accomplishment already, and it explains why so
many people fall for the anti-tobacco frauds -- school teachers
included.
The brainwashing and persecution of the smoking youth with FALSE
INFORMATION about tobacco is already having terrible consequences
(see below) and IT MUST BE STOPPED. What about prison terms for those who will not go along? It
seems the logical next step to ensure compliance! From Wisconsin comes the tragic story of a schoolgirl
expelled, not for smoking, but for merely having a cigarette on her
personal property. The good student was so distraught and humiliated
that she took her own life. She joins a growing list of Americans who
have suffered violence and loss of life because of the anti-smoking
hysteria gripping this country. These horrible tales will become
increasingly common unless the perpetrators are brought to justice.
The bereaved parents are contemplating a suit against the
school district. In addition, they should take a look at The American
Cancer Society, the anti-tobacco organization that runs the
anti-smoking program in Wisconsin. The ACS is reaping millions of
dollars from the taxpayers to "solve" a non-existent
problem. The ACS believes tobacco should be outlawed and in the
interim is willing to advocate harsh penalties for smoking. The
American Cancer Society's hands are stained with blood.
The above paragraph from The San Diego Union Tribune
should convince the doubters that California is now a full-fledged
police state where civil liberties are now obsolete. The story
describes the financial ruin of a bar owner who has been crushed by a
health department directed completely by the anti-tobacco brown shirts
who have foisted a wildly unpopular law upon a demoralized populace.
The owner in the story attempted to obey the law
prohibiting smoking in bars. Like most owners he found that bars are
not conducive to health fascism and, to make a living, he resumed
making his customers welcome. Now a working stiff is ruined, San Diego
is synonymous with Nazi Berlin and a city attorney's office has been
debased.
This incident highlights anti-tobacco operative Stanton
Glantz' lies that no-smoking laws will have no financial impact on
businesses. Bankrupt business people and jailed smokers can pass the
time by calculating how much of their money ended up in the wallets of
Stanton Glantz and his criminal cronies.
Repeals additional $.50 per pack tax on cigarettes and
equivalent increase in state tax on tobacco products previously
enacted by Proposition 10 at November 3, 1998, election. Provides for
elimination of funding for Proposition 10 early childhood development
and smoking prevention programs. Prohibits imposition of additional
surtaxes on the distribution of cigarettes or tobacco products unless
enacted by the state legislature.
Provides that all additional tobacco taxes previously
collected under Proposition 10 shall be appropriated and expended at
which time the California Children and Families First Trust Fund shall
terminate.
Last November, Rob Reiner, former sit-com actor and current
third tier movie director, watched the election returns with dismay as
his tax scheme appeared to be headed for defeat. One week later he was
crowing with triumph as the final return revealed that his tax hike
had garnered a franction of a percentage over 50 percent.
The results of his narrowly approved initiative have
confirmed the worst fears of those who predicted that the hundreds of
millions stolen from California citizens would launch the most
irresponsible orgy of special interest spending in the state's
history. After months of haggling, the gaggle of parasites who
administer the loot are spreading it around to the social engineers
and new-age quacks who are now charged with raising lower income
children as they see fit.
With no state oversight, the thousands of new county
bureaucrats will reign over their fiefdoms completely unaccountable to
the tax payers who foot the bills. Already reports are surfacing that
some of the funds are being used to pay the salaries of employees who
were hired to perform functions completely unrelated to the so-called
"childrens' development" programs the Reiner Tax is supposed
to address.
Californians have an excellent opportunity next spring to
regain control from the theives and special interest confidence
artists and return it where it belongs: to the people.
While political correctness has forced Proctor to take safety
distance from the advocates of free choice, his work, inescapably,
blatantly demonstrates that totalitarianism and the use of health
policy to control behaviour are one and the same.
This review is illustrated with several images of the time. One of
them is modern, and the politically correct caption says: "In a
1995 advertisement, Philip Morris equates smokers with Jews for its
purposes." If the purposes are freedom to smoke and to choose,
then they are noble even if they have a commercial background. The
commercial background is the same as the one of the pharmaceutical
industry financing the anti-tobacco cartel's false information in
order to sell ineffective smoking cessation devices.
At any rate, that was when PM hadn't bent over yet. PM was indeed
quite correct in comparing the persecution of smokers with the
persecution of Jews. While at first that was interpreted by many as
exaggeration, and an insult to Jews, each day demonstrates that those
who compared the two persecutions were seeing far beyond average. |