ARTICLES
FROM OTHER SOURCES

"The precautionary principle appeals to the commonsense idea of "better safe than sorry." In practice, though, it biases regulatory decisions against the introduction of any new technology. While those who advocate adoption of the precautionary principle purport to be acting in defense of public health and the environment, the precautionary principle may well leave us more sorry and less safe." This article is a good response to all those who support the nonsensical prohibit-just-in-case attitude to consciously or unconsciously disguise what is in actuality a prohibitionist and fascist mindset. Prohibition of what is ASCERTAINED beyond any reasonable doubt to be dangerous is understandable. But when public policy makers prohibit things or behaviours the effect of which is either still debated, or unquantifiable (from microwave/electromagnetic radiation to global warming, from pesticides to the health effects of smoking), that only demonstrates that the ignorance of the policy makers can only produce spasmodic hysteria instead of the rational research to ascertain reality. This mammoth book is the size of a large city phone book: 462 pages
of documentation, 205 pages of appendices, and a 48-page Index. See
See FORCES' bookcase. "Lawyers in North Carolina leapt to the defense yesterday
of U.S. District Judge William Osteen, who was targeted by an
anti-smoking group in California that used tax dollars to compile an
''enemies list'' that included the judge."
" Newspapers in California reported this week that the
Americans for Nonsmokers Rights Foundation, a nonprofit group, has
received more than $1.2 million since 1995 in proceeds from a state
tax of 25 cents a pack on cigarettes. The group is reported to have
used the money to compile an ''enemies list'' that aimed to expose
front groups that the tobacco industry uses to fight tobacco-control
programs. "
"The list included Osteen, a judge since 1991 for the Middle
District of North Carolina who issued a ruling last year that
overturned a federal report on second-hand tobacco smoke. "
" The money comes through Proposition 99, which was enacted by
California voters in 1988 to pay for advertising campaigns to help
persuade children and others not to smoke. " We don't think that there is much to add. Just throw them in jail
where they belong... ' We have watched legislation in the last ten years
increasingly allow the state to restrict the rights and freedom of
citizens in Oregon, and we have archives about the meetings in l986
called "Oregon Agenda for the l990"s Children and
Families" wherein a consensus of state employees and elected
officials set the stage, Governor Goldschmidt and John Kitzhaber and
Vera Katz and Beverly Stein and Barbara Roberts many others who are
now appointed in positions of authority in Oregon government.
At these meetings it was decided that Oregon would lead the way
with a socialist agenda that culminated in Oregon Shines, Benchmarks
Goals 2000 programs that affect every part of every life for
Oregonians. Kitzhaber said "the state is the parent of the child,
and the parents are part of the problem" in meeting the state
goals, and the state is going to take the children and force parents
into contracts, so that federal funds can be used to provide services
that the parents cannot afford "in the best interest of the
child" '. These are not the words of some sensationalistic nut. They are also
the no longer implicit words of the anti-tobacco cartel and its
mandatory anti-tobacco "education" programs, where children
are taught to nag and disrespect smoking parents, undermining the very
essence of the family. The Socialist state has always encouraged the
families to surrender their children to it. And the failure of
Socialism everywhere has not discouraged the American Neo-Socialists
who are trying to turn the US into the political revenge of the USSR. This is really welcome news for smokers. If this group wants to
keep busy, we can address them to the anti-smoking cartel
"studies" on tobacco-related disease, ETS, and all the other
fraudulent permutations of junk science that are the backbone of the
"evidence" against tobacco and its users.
This group would have to work overtime and then some! May we
recommend that prisons of adequate crowd capacity are built first? What you are witnessing is the New Prohibition. It is the Volstead
Act all over again, in different guises. It aims to enforce clean
living by edict. And it is almost certain to fail, as greatly as the
last Prohibition failed in the 1920s." At the recent Senate tobacco hearing, various senators came forward
to defend the attempt to circumvent Congress in dealing with tobacco
issues. It appears that some members in "the world's most
deliberative body" now prefer less when it comes to tobacco.
Unable to move tobacco legislation in the face congressional
opposition, these members called for a type of constitutional end-run.
With the cooperation of the courts, it was hoped that sweeping changes
could be without congressional involvement.
The ultimate casualty, however, may be Madisonian democracy and a
constitution that demands consent rather than convenience in handling
political controversy." ' In a blistering report released Monday, a prestigious medical
group said America's entire health care system needs "dramatic
changes" to cut the enormous number of deaths and injuries from
medical errors.
The group said hospitals should report mistakes to the federal
government - not keep them secret as they often do now. "For too
long medical errors in hospitals and elsewhere have been buried and it
is long overdue that they need to be reported to public
agencies," said Dr. Sid Wolfe of Public Citizen, a consumer
watchdog group. Experts say between 44,000 and 98,000 Americans die
from mistakes every year in hospitals alone. That makes hospital
errors the eighth leading cause of death - actually ahead of traffic
accidents, breast cancer and AIDS. ' Medical errors are listed as the number 8 killer, but that's at the
lower figure of 44,000. If the real number is 98,000, it would be
number 5. The article refers only to hospital errors, so if we add in
deaths due to mistakes at doctors offices' and clinics, the number
would be much larger. This is an astounding fact - doctors may be the
number 5 killer in the United States. Wanna talk about health risks?
And these numbers refer to the fatal cases only -- presumably there
are lots of medical error cases where the victims are alive, but
certainly not well.
God knows how many of those "mistakes" are logged as
tobacco-related deaths! Who is going to make these people pay? Who is
going to wipe the medical establishment from category of acceptable
people -- as happened to smokers and to an industry selling a legal
product? Where are legal actions to recover the "cost to
society?" Where are the headlines from major newspapers or some
CBS special "exposè" complete with suggestive titles and
stupid music in the background?
Those are, of course, rhetorical questions, as fairness and justice
are administered by those in power, and sold to those who are close to
that power. The anti-tobacco cartel is disappointed that some states are using
the money looted from smokers and the tobacco industry for purposes
other than its campaign of hate, frauds and suppression of rights and
truth on smoking.
The fact is that when it comes to money and the opportunity to grab
it, it is already quite difficult to find honour among straight people
- never mind thieves. Milwaukee a case in point. Indeed, Milwaukee's city attorney in
October described a possible lawsuit against lead-paint manufacturers
as "problematic." Among the difficulties were proving which
manufacturer's paint caused which victim's harm, and proving that
victims were harmed by paint rather than by some other source of lead
encountered in everyday life.
Still, Milwaukee's city council persisted. It decided to follow the
approach used against tobacco companies by seeking out a private law
firm to represent it on a contingency-fee basis. Thus, the lawsuit
will cost Milwaukee virtually nothing and could provide many millions
of dollars if it succeeds.
What's in it for the private law firm, which may not be paid if the
suit fails? ' This is yet another interesting article we recommend for reading.
One important thing, however, must be highlighted.
The "public" did not cheer when looters and liars won on
the tobacco industry last year. Those who cheered were the uninformed,
the hysterical, the hateful, and all those who got instigated by those
corrupt media that sold themselves ethically and intellectually to
outright frauds and put up an anti-tobacco show. Those media, in other
words, that have proven to be so socially irresponsible as to promote
hysteria instead of attempting to tone it down. Whether their name is
CBS, BBC, or CNN for example, those media have been - and are -
accessories to the implementation of scientific/statistical frauds, as
it is clear that their zeal about anti-tobacco greatly exceeds their
duty to report. In these times of "creative lawsuits"
perhaps some intelligent lawyer could find a way to give the
anti-tobacco cartel and its media minions an overdose of their own
poisonous medicine. The unproven theory, discussed in the story, is that women
are more vulnerable to "cancer-causing substances in tobacco
smoke". The theory is unproven and, despite the billions of
dollars flushed down the anti-tobacco toilet, likely to remain
unproven since there are no substances in
tobacco smoke that have ever been proved to cause cancer. The
search for this Holy Grail has enriched thousands of anti-tobacco
stooges and goons for over three decades and will continue until the
thugs are prosecuted for fraud.
The researchers from the University of California - San
Francisco, home to Stanton Glantz, the granddaddy of statistical
manipulation, attempt to cover all bases by dragging in the
discredited notion that secondhand smoke also is harder on women than
men. As there is no evidence that tobacco smoke contains
"cancer-causing substances", it is a double absurdity to lie
to the public that secondhand smoke causes cancer.
The good news is that mayoral candidate Tom Ammiano is a
cigarette smoker and that the incumbent, Willie Brown, is rumored to
smoke cigars (illegally) with his cronies in North Beach bars. No
matter who wins, the highest office in the city will be occupied by a
smoker.
Willie Brown's record regarding smoking is not bad. During
his years running the legislature in Sacramento, he supported the
right of business owners to set their own smoking policies. He
strongly opposed the unpopular 1995 law that bans smoking in
restaurants and bars and appears willing to wink at the almost
universal non-compliance of the smoking ban in bars.
Tom Ammiano, currently President of the S.F. Board of
Supervisors, supported suing the tobacco industry and has voted to
deny first amendment rights to billboard companies and stores to
advertise cigarettes and tobacco products. Ammiano, and his fellow
county supervisors, seem inclined to ignore the widespread smoking
going on in San Francisco bars.
The anti-tobacco cartel truly dislikes Willie Brown.
Operatives attempted to smear him four years ago when he first ran for
mayor. Proving once again that the public truly doesn't care about
tobacco, Mayor Brown overwhelmingly won that election. This year the
cartel had pretty much been silent about its desire to boot Willie
Brown out of office except for initiating a hit piece in a weekly
throwaway rag. Mayor Brown must always be credited with cutting off
state funding to anti-tobacco goon Stanton Glantz. For that smokers
should always be grateful.
The contest for District Attorney is more clear-cut as far
as the smoking issue is concerned. Incumbent Terence Hallinan, while
on the county board of supervisors, booted smokers out into the cold
by voting to ban smoking in restaurants, coffee shops and work places.
Whenever presented with an anti-tobacco piece of legislation, the
so-called progressive liberal politician voted for repression. Smokers
should never forget that Hallinan holds them in contempt. His
opponent, a highly regarded veteran of the S.F. District Attorney's
Office, Bill Fazio has never held a position where his opinion on
tobacco smoking was relevant.
'By calling their One Double Oh Seven pub a ``club and smoking
parlor'' and keeping a humidor amply stocked with cigars, owners Mark
and Beverly Swanson say they are exempt from California's
no-smoking-in-bars law that took effect Jan. 1, 1998. The law allows
smoking in ``tobacco shops and private smokers lounges.'' '
'Prosecutors were stunned but say they have not given up. Barred
from appealing the decision by the constitutional double-jeopardy
clause, the Santa Cruz County District Attorney's Office has instead
filed a civil lawsuit against the bar alleging unfair business
practices.'
"Unfair business practice," huh? How do we call putting
bars out of business basing the law on fraudulent science? And how
do we call respecting the right of a business owner to allow
smoking in his property? Those are question that the liberty-hating,
fraud-loving anti-tobacco cartel does not even care to consider.
But smoking is still a right and it always will be -- in the
face of all fascists. In a 3-0 ruling, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said a 1997
ordinance in Tacoma, Wash., violated a 1969 federal law that prohibits
local governments from applying any ``requirement or prohibition based
on smoking and health'' to cigarette advertising. Is the secret National Security Agency, working with its
counterpart agencies in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand,
eavesdropping on private communications from around the world?
Credible reports suggest that a global electronic surveillance system
-- known by the code name of "ECHELON" -- is indeed
capturing satellite, microwave, cellular and fiber-optic
communications worldwide.
Over the past few months, the U.S. House of Representatives has
been investigating ECHELON and related activities. As part of these
investigations, the House Select Committee on Intelligence requested
documents from the National Security Agency (NSA) regarding its
operating standards for intelligence systems like ECHELON that may
intercept communications of Americans. In a surprising move, NSA
officials invoked attorney-client privilege and refused to disclose
the documents. This action drew the ire of several members of
Congress, including the committee's chairman, Rep. Porter Goss (R-FL).
Many observers, from the ACLU to conservative Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA),
are calling Congress to conduct further inquiries into the workings of
this global surveillance system. You can read more about ECHELON and
send a letter to Congress supporting further investigations into its
activities at our action alert:
http://www.aclu.org/action/echelon106.html
In addition, the ACLU has launched a special website detailing the
possible threats of ECHELON and other research on the program. The
website can be found at:
Far too often smokers apologize for enjoying the inocuous
pleasure of smoking tobacco and tolerate the nonsense propagated by
anti-tobacco special interests. Smokers don't want to make waves or
rock the boat. Innate good manners and general geniality have brought
smokers to the point where actual violence and imprisonment are just
around the corner.
This article by Walter Williams not only enumerates some of
the most outrageous injustices foisted upon smokers, but, very
refreshingly, presents a call to smokers to stop groveling and stand
up for their rights as American citizens.
Here is the section
dedicated to the pathetic Insider movie saga. We have just added
the article of the National Post. But don't forget to read the rest.
Wingand is a true scum, apparently complete with criminal record,
including physical abuse. And he fits perfectly with the Canadian scum
that has hired him, as well as the Disney one that, using to
perfection the Liberal scale of values, has made a hero out of a petty
criminal. "During one of the most vigorous oral arguments at the court
in months, the justices suggested by their questions that they were
almost certain to invalidate the FDA's watershed effort to regulate
the nicotine in cigarettes and smokeless tobacco as a drug."
But let us keep them moist just in case we get a great Christmas
gift! This authoritative paper concerns also the Great Anti-Smoking
Scientific Fraud in general. Year after year, fraud after fraud, the
anti-tobacco cartel has managed to construct such a complex and
intertwined building of misinformation that ranges from "creative
interpretation" to outright fraud, it is now virtually impossible
to demolish it without huge analysis that the masses have neither the
time nor the qualifications to understand.
This is the colossal problem facing those who are dedicated to the
exposure of the anti-tobacco frauds. How is it possible to demonstrate
to the layperson decades of systematic scientific deceit and sloppy,
biased work? Politicians and lay people are intimidated by the massive
amount of information created by the anti-tobacco cartel and most of
them accept it on the basis of "faith," and as confirmation
of the popular and undefined "smoking is no good for you"
folklore.
Nevertheless, starting with the 1964 Surgeon General Report, we
have nothing but speculations (the wildest the better) that have been
insufficiently challenged and, at first, have been ignored by
mass-media. That is turn has given the cartel plenty of time to
consolidate those lies, and let them become the "proof" upon
which more and more lies and speculations were (and are continuously)
built.
It may well be that smoking is responsible for some disease. But
when faced with such massive amounts of deception by the very
establishment that cannot actually prove just ONE of
the claims in any orthodox scientific way except with the use of
speculative epidemiology, it is difficult to detect the shreds of
truth that may lay in the enmeshed fabric of lies. " Dr Luke Clancy, chairman of the anti-smoking group ASH,
said 17 per cent of smokers were trying to give up; two years ago the
figure was 23 per cent."
"He was presenting the results of an independent survey of
1,400 adults carried out on behalf of the nicotine substitute
manufacturer, Nicorette." HA, HA, HA!! -- Independent
survey paid by the pharmaceuticals! We are in stitches! Has
Nicorette paid for this article too? What is the percentage that
directly or indirectly goes into the pockets of ASH? Come on, ASH,
this is the question: Do you get any money, directly or
indirectly, from the pharmaceutical industry? Yes/no
please. And if yes, how much? FORCES gets nothing
from the tobacco industry: we are "clean," and truly
independent. The WHO gets
paid by the pharmaceuticals, and that's declared. At least, we
know that what the WHO says is what the Drugs Lords say. What about you?
Even though it is amply demonstrated that quit-smoking patches have
about the effect of a band aid on quitting smoking, the pharmaceutical
industry, while financing the cartel and pumping out junk science on
"tobacco-related diseases," presents the latest antismoking
gimmick: Nicorette Microtabs! A nicotine
"substitute," it is a tiny tablet which is placed under the
tongue and allowed to dissolve for 20 to 30 minutes. Of course, these
dishonest people keep defrauding the public by implying that smoking
is about nicotine, while it is not.
So smokers, instead of feeling guilty and trying to quit, just keep
quitting to listen to the anti-tobacco cartel and to the
multinationals behind it. Just keep puffing and enjoy
life. You know, you will even out-live the anti-tobacco cartel! |