- Is America beginning to wake
up to the criminal methods of the anti-tobacco cartel? It sure seems
that way. Here are some comments from major press outlets - including
some that have been notoriously "sold out" to antismoking
propaganda: Added July 29,
2000
Pittsburgh
Post-Gazette - "Smoke signal: An anti-tobacco verdict
mocks law and democracy."
Cincinnati Post
- "Ridiculous ... outrageous ... A ruling that completely ignores
personal responsibility is a joke."
Washington Post
- "The biggest damages here may be to the reputation of the legal
system."
Tampa Tribune
- "The bottom line is that courtrooms are not the proper forums
for setting public policy, and personal responsibility should not be
dismissed out of hand. "
Indianapolis Star - "Falls
somewhere between confiscation and robbery."
Des Moines Register -
"'This was never about money,' the plaintiffs' attorney said
immediately after the verdict. Whooooo, boy."
Europe contaminated by
antismoking greed and moral corruption? - UP IN SMOKE
- Added July 29, 2000
- "Nearly every nation
has a lottery, a game of chance to amuse its citizens while enriching
government. But it is usually considered unsporting for one nation's
government to buy tickets in another's lottery. And it is just plain
strange when a group of industrialized nations get together and hope
to strike it rich at the U.S. government's version of the slot
machine. We're talking about the European Union's recently announced
intent to sue tobacco companies in a U.S. District Court."
SMUGGLING
SUPPORTS TERRORISTS - Added
July 25, 2000 - It's no surprise that
cigarette smuggling is on the rise due to the exorbitant taxes and the
unjust tobacco settlement costs. Black market, gray market,
smuggling and the violence that has accompanied these activities are
the natural consequences when a popular product is over-taxed.
What is a shock is that violent terrorists are now worming into the
racket.
We
have frequently stated that anti-tobacco is anti-America. As the
violence and corruption grows the law-abiding citizens of the U.S.A.
can thank the anti-smokers for making society less safe just so they
can grow rich.
WHO IS "BIG TOBACCO" NOW? - The
Florida award isn't the last word - Added July 24, 2000
- ' After a jury ordered the
five leading tobacco companies to pay $145 billion in punitive damages
-- the largest product liability award in history -- Philip Morris
attorneys responded calmly, saying the verdict would "have no
practical impact." Although there was obviously an element of
bravado to this attitude, it also reflected sincere confidence in the
industry's ability to prevail on appeal in Engle v. R.J. Reynolds, a
class action by Florida smokers ' says Jacob Sullum.
The fact is, the antismoking cartel knows that its claims cannot be
proven and that, eventually, it will lose virtually every single
litigation it initiates. The main purpose may be actually different:
exploit the political noise to continue in the agenda of taxation and
persecution of smokers.
SHAFTING THE BLIND
- Added
July 19, 2000 - In case anyone has any doubts that the anti-smokers are the
meanest spirited people currently operating in the country, check out
the lousy trick they played on a blind man in the Long Island
community of Hauppauge.
Determined to nab a perp in an undercover sting operation,
the Suffolk Health Department sent a 16-year-old to buy some smokes
from a bind man working at a concession in a state office building.
The minor got his smokes and the blind man was fired. Add the
outrage of axing a popular employee to the despicable message sent to
the teenager and you have anti-tobacco at its purest essence.
A VOICE OF REASON FROM THE
GOLDEN STATE - Added July 19, 2000 - Not all the press in California is
owned by the anti-tobacco special interests and trial lawyers.
As readership of the major metropolitan dailies plummets due to the
single-party ideology pervasive in Los Angeles and San Francisco, its
refreshing to find a major daily that challenges the state's orthodoxy
of victim hood and corporate demonization.
What's
truly amazing and depressing is that the common sense comments in The
Orange Country Register are as rare in the kooky state as honest
politicians.
SMOKING MOM - Added July 19, 2000
- Great article from Salon.
In spite of the multi-millions spent on convincing people that
smoking is the most awful vice of all time, the public just isn't
buying it. Although too much seeps into the national conscious,
at some level rational people feel that they are being fed a load of
bull. When the anti-tobacco agenda finally collapses under its
own weight of falsity and hysteria, Americans will marvel that a
mother who smokes, and admits it, could ever be a controversial
subject.
Removing
unwanted opposition - AN OPEN LETTER FROM JEFF JACOBY TO HIS
FRIENDS - JACOBY: A RAW DEAL - LIBERAL ENEMIES DID JACOBY IN: WASHINGTON
POST - We are
sure many of our American readers have read at least some of Jeff
Jacoby's terrific columns either in the Boston Globe or syndicated in
local papers. He has been an articulate and eloquent spokesman for
liberty (and has even been one of the few mainstream columnists to
write fairly and accurately on the tobacco issue). The Globe had hired
him as a dissident voice to demonstrate "balance" to the
leftist liberalism. But apparently, Jeff was gaining too much of a
following, so now The Globe has suspended him on the flimsiest of
excuses (that he wrote a column on the signers of the Declaration of
Independence, and did not acknowledge that others had also written on
this same topic). Another voice for liberty and choice is about to be
silenced. Write an e-mail to the Boston Globe. Give them a call (617.
929.2000). Send a fax (617.929.2098). Read his side of the story by
clicking on the first header. Help to keep alive the Freedom of
Expression. At FORCES, we are all with you, Jeff!
AHA
PUNCHES OUT THE GOV - Added
July 13, 2000 - Attempting an end-run
around the executive and legislative branches of California, the
American Heart Association took out a full page ad to blast Governor
Gray Davis. The ad is the latest in a series of attacks on state
governments over the spoils from the so-called tobacco settlement.
A few months ago anti-tobacco was screaming that smoking rates were on
the rise and more money was needed to stop the climb. Now they
cry that smoking rates are going down and more money is needed to keep
that trend going.
AHA and its partners including The American Lung Association, The
American Cancer Society and the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids are
slavering over the billions wafting to state legislatures and are
frantic that the loot is evading their grasp. California is
planning to use its share of the settlement to expand and prop up
health services. The legislature has so legislated and the
governor seems to have approved.
AHA and the others need an emphatic reminder that Governor Davis
and the legislature are elected officials. Californians
sent them to Sacramento to make the decisions and policies that govern
the expenditures of the settlement funds. AHA, ALA and ACS have
never been elected and represent no constituency. They ought to
butt out.
BERKELEY'S
PUSH TO STIFLE FREE SPEECH - Added July 13, 2000 -
Tossing its reputation as a bastion of free speech into the
trash can, the Berkeley City Council passed a resolution demanding
that newspapers refuse to accept tobacco advertising. The resolution,
passing unanimously with one abstention, perfectly embodies the
anti-choice policies that have come to define the city.
It is telling that in today's Berkeley dissent is so politically
risky that the lone city council member who said that the city should
not interfere with the free-speech rights of the press was so
intimidated that she abstained rather than vote her convictions.
Equally cowed are the newspapers that are being asked to curb their
profits. Instead of ringing statements referring to the Declaration of
Independence and the Bill of Rights, the publications, including those
that label themselves "alternative" and
"independent" appear quite willing to let the Berkeley City
Council dictate their advertising policies.
What isn't puzzling is why Berkeley is in the forefront of
repression in California. For over 10 years the Berkeley Health
Department and the City Council have operated under the heavy hand of
anti-tobacco special interest groups.
Berkeley is the only city in California that has its own branch of
the state's Tobacco Control Section. The TCS works with
anti-tobacco special interests to impose smoking bans and demonize
smokers.
Berkeley is also the stomping grounds of the Americans for
Nonsmokers' Rights. The tax-exempt pressure group made headlines
last year when an enemies list it compiled using tax funds was
unearthed. The echoes of the McCarthy era
disturb civil libertarians but apparently are welcome to the current
crop of Berkeley politicians. No wonder the free-speech
supporter on the council didn't dare vote to oppose the resolution.
With the ANR and Tobacco Control Section directing tobacco policies
in Berkeley it no surprise that free-speech is now under attack by
City Hall.
History buffs who wish to experience a culture and political scene
reminiscent of Germany during the National Socialist German Workers'
Party's rise to power are advised to check out Berkeley for a real
blast from the past.
TRIAL LAWYERS UNLEASHED - Added July 13, 2000
- "When state attorneys
general joined up with private personal injury lawyers to go after Big
Tobacco, their partnership and the billions it produced for state
coffers were hailed in many circles. Critics were dismissed as
alarmist."
"Since tobacco, however, municipalities have bonded with
wealthy personal-injury lawyers to go after the gun industry, and
Rhode Island has marched in against the manufacturers of lead paint,
although the product has not been sold for decades. One could argue
that lead and guns fit into the tobacco paradigm. But how about latex
and automobiles?"
ESCALATING
VIOLENCE - Added
July 11, 2000 - It's becoming all too
familiar. A gang of thugs knocks off a convenience store, severely beating up the sales clerk in the
process. What's new is that cigarettes, not money, are targeted. Such heists are
erupting throughout California.
Inevitably people will be killed.
It isn't supposed to happen.
Hollywood's Rob Reiner, the man responsible for the latest tax hike on cigarettes, promised
that tax evasion and black marketeering would not result from
exorbitant tobacco taxes. He was lying and the consequences of his lies are slowly
bubbling up through the mainstream media.
When a product is taxed far
beyond the actual cost of its production, black markets, violence and
tax dodging will occur as night follows day.
PYRRHIC
VICTORY FOR ANTI-TOBACCO - Added July 11, 2000 -
A district court of appeals in California has ruled in favor
of Stanton Glantz, an anti-tobacco maven working for the University of
California, in a case that could pave the way for similar legal
actions against tax-funded activism.
Californians for Scientific Integrity sued the university in 1998
after Glantz published a study asserting that smoking bans did not
hurt tourism. That study was eventually so discredited that Glantz had
to admit that "mistakes"
were made and his claims that bans cause no economic harm were
dropped. Despite the success of their efforts, CSI pursued legal
action asserting that Glantz, and the university, are misusing public
money to pursue a political agenda.
By a pretzel twist of logic the court of appeals has decided to exempt
Stanton Glantz and the University of California from the rules that
govern other recipients of government funds. Because the issue is
tobacco, any and all efforts to control its use are to be allowed.
The good news is that Californians for Scientific Integrity is on the
right path. Targeting a particularly egregious example of anti-tobacco
corruption head-on is the only tactic that will succeed. CSI has
suffered a setback and should appeal the court's decision. It may take
time but aggressive, sustained action against the grievous misuse of
tax dollars to promote the financial interests of anti-tobacco will
succeed.
GOING
FOR THE GOLD - Added
July 10, 2000 - Get ready for the most
colossal punitive verdict in history. A Florida judge refused to
set any limits that tobacco companies must pay in a class action suit
on behalf of sick smokers. The sick Florida smokers number
between 300,000 to 700,000 which is a meaningless count since the
judge tossed out the concept of verifying whether any of this nebulous
horde actually was damaged by cigarettes.
Whatever
the amount, the one sure result is that the tobacco industry will pass
on the cost to their customers and the plaintiffs' lawyers will
graduate from excessively rich to filthy rich.
ANOTHER
HO-HUM VICTORY - Added
July 10, 2000 - Once again an
out-of-control public health agency, bent on stamping out consumer
choice, has been slapped down by the courts. Celebrations, however,
must be tempered with the hard truth that this court win is based on
technicalities of jurisdiction rather than on meaningful principles.
Until the hospitality industry, civil libertarians and decent
citizens, both smokers and non-smokers are willing to tackle smoking
bans for what they are, attacks on private property using junk
science, the prohibitionists will continue with their bans.
There
is no evidence that secondhand smoke poses any health risks. A
federal judge has vacated the Environmental Protection Agency's
secondhand smoke report. Business owners have the right to set
their own smoking policies. These principles are very simple and
very obvious. It's time to start using them instead of legal
mumbo jumbo.
EDUCATION BY OSMOSIS - Added July 9, 2000
- Despite the billions of dollars
spent to convince the country that tobacco is more toxic than nuclear
waste, Americans just aren't buying the con. Although John
Halloran, the young investor who has decided to invest in a
tobacco company, has suffered through anti-tobacco campaigns
throughout his entire life, he somehow has managed to discern the
difference between right and wrong and reason and hysteria. Now
if only he could stop being such a sissy about about the joys of
tobacco.
CHELSEA CLINTON, A TYPICAL KID - Added July 9, 2000
- Despite her preposterous
parents, it appears Chelsea Clinton has grown up to be a normal
American kid who is marking her passage into adulthood with a
cigarette. The Stanford University student was smoking up a
storm recently in a Washington, DC coffee shop. If true, her
affinity to tobacco makes Chelsea her daddy's girl since President
Clinton, despite his public anti-tobacco piety, is himself a smoker.
Mommy Hillary is out of step with her family as well as being far
outside the American mainstream.
Anti-tobacco pays - for smokers' health, of
course! - Added
July 6, 2000
TRIAL LAWYERS GIVE HEAVILY TO DEMOCRATS
CORNYN MOVES IN ON ANTI-TOBACCO LAWYERS
MOTIONS FLYING AGAIN OVER TOBACCO LAWYERS' FEES
LAWYERS CHALLENGE AG'S SUBPOENAS
"Every three months, like
clockwork, another $25 million arrives for the five Texas tobacco
lawyers." The five are fighting tooth and nail to avoid
being put under oath by Texas Attorney General John Cornyn, a
Republican, about how they came by that money. So far, according to
the Dallas Morning News report, the five have taken in more
than $400 million of the billions they expect eventually from the
tobacco settlement, and have recycled a goodly chunk of that change
into political donations -- more than $2.2 million in unrestricted
soft money to the Democrats already in this election cycle, with
further sums expected.
TOO MUCH NEGATIVITY - Added July 4, 2000 - A top Los Angeles advertising agency has dumped
its account with the state's Tobacco Control Section.
Apparently the anti-smoker tone demanded by the Control Section is so
vicious that the agency is unable to continue the $25-million per year
account. The agency has found that the public is turned off by
too much negativity. The increase in the state's smoking rate
verifies that the Control Section's tactic of demonizing smokers is
backfiring.
JACUZZI ALERT: SPA BATHS 'CAN CAUSE LUNG DISEASE'
- Added July 4, 2000
- Regular use of indoor spa baths
puts people at risk of lung disease, say researchers. The bubbles in
the hot tubs contain bacteria which are dispersed around the room when
they burst, causing respiratory problems, they report.
"Because luxury items like hot tubs are
becoming more common, I believe there will be an increasing
recognition and understanding of the risk associated with their use
among doctors and consumers."
TURNING POINT FOR THE EPA?
- Added July 4, 2000
- Article by Dr. Gio Batta Gori in The Washington Times about
the fabrication and the creative interpretation of risk by the EPA.
Recently the courts have begun to pass judgements on EPA's slippery
science. "Both verdicts against the agency have been influenced
by a sequence of Supreme Court rulings on how significant risk is to
be defined in scientific terms." "Clearly, the rules of play
have changed substantially, and regulatory agencies may no longer feel
virtually immune from legal challenge."
HEAVY-HANDED START
OF SMOKERS’ PERSECUTION IN ITALY - Added
July 4, 2000 - Three
weeks ago, the Italian Minister of Health Umberto Veronesi announced
the official beginning of the war on smokers in Italy. The Italian
parliamentarians booed and ridiculed the proposed law, which would ban
smoking in all public places except in the streets. They lit
cigarettes and cigars in Parliament during the speech. One of them is
said to have even walked to Veronesi and blown smoke in his face. The
supporters of common sense and personal liberty did not have long to
wait for the heavy-handed response of the antismoking cartel.
The British Guardian reports that an Italian bank is now
being investigated for manslaughter for the death of an
asthmatic "from second-hand smoke". This scam is necessary
to create the popular consensus to implement prohibition. The fact
that there is no evidence of any danger from second-hand smoke
is immaterial to the terrorist tactics of the international cartel,
which wants to turn tolerant Italy into a hell for smokers, to satisfy
the marketing needs for smoking cessation by the pharmaceutical
multinationals.
|