|
October 31
- EXAMINE
THE SOURCE
-
Smokers who want to kick
the habit can triple their chances of quitting by sucking a lozenge,
claim scientists.
-
The new nicotine
replacement lozenge has been hailed as a significant weapon in the
fight against tobacco addiction.
-
Scientists found it had a
success rate unsurpassed by any other form of nicotine replacement
therapy such as patches or chewing gum.
And who do these scientists
work for? Why, GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of the miracle
cessation lozenge! If the tobacco industry -- or any other industry,
for that matter -- attempted to pull this stunt of hyping its own product
using "scientific" research funded by and produced by itself,
the guffaws from the media would be deafening. Since the product
relates directly to smoking, however, the media passes of this blatantly
self-serving press release as "news".
Never forget that smoking
cessation devices are 85% unsuccessful. A failure rate that dismal
would bring down the wrath of the "truth in advertising" crowd
on any other industry. Forget the lozenges and keep smoking.
October 31 - BUYING
DOCTOR'S SUPPORT - We cannot turn around in
Atlanta without pharmaceutical companies trying to give us gifts, feed us
at the Ritz-Carlton, or introduce us to some celebrity. This is all part
of the estimated $13,000 per American physician per year the companies
spend trying to influence doctors’ choices of prescription medicines for
our patients
The hyper-saturation of drug
ads on television and radio is fairly knew, a gift to Big Drugs from
former FDA director David Kessler, while passing out goodies to doctors
has been a favorite tactic for a very long time. The difference now
is that instead of a novelty pen or cheap paperweight the drug companies'
bribe budget has grown apace with its massive donations to
politicians. The largesse is paying big dividends as the
government's message of "you must stop smoking" is combined with
the family doctor's message of "to stop smoking you must take this
cessation pill, patch, gum, lozenge, drink".
October 31 -
Addictive, huh? - OSU
SMOKING STUDY GETS $850,000 BOOST - Smoking is supposed to be
sooo addictive, according to some "experts", that it's harder to quit than
heroine. So why do cessation rates rise dramatically when people are
paid to quit smoking? Because money talks, that's why - and phoney addiction can be effectively "treated" with
real cash incentives. We are intrigued by this latest study, in which pregnant women and - note this - their "social support partners" were given cash if the women stopped smoking. Nothing is said in the article about the socio-economic status of these women. We have a theory we'd like to test in a study of our own: the poorer the women are, the higher the cessation rate will be - and really financially desperate women will have a cessation rate of nearly 100 per cent! We're also willing to bet that with the "surprising success" of programs such as the one desribed here, we'll see rising numbers of social control freaks in support of behaviour control contracts between disadvantaged people and their kindly, wise state benefactors. Can we have a grant for further study, too? For more information about the "addiction" to smoking,
click here.
October
30 - FREEDOM
SNUFFED OUT - So forget freedom. Majority rules. Minorities
submit. The parks aren't big enough for smokers and nonsmokers.
Figure freedom's just another word for nothing really learned. Or freedom
is only for good people doing good things -- and Perry and Vasquez get to
decide what's good.
Excellent
article from San Francisco Chronicle columnist Debra
Saunders regarding the proposal to ban smoking from every square inch
of park land in Los Angeles. One by one she addresses each of the
points the anti-smoker crowd advances and demolishes them
completely. Hard-hitting and witty, this piece is a must read for
those to whom freedom is not just another word.
October
30 - ADVICE FOR MARGINALISED NON-SMOKERS: MUNCH ON SOME FRUIT OR HAVE ONE OF OURS
- As this Guardian article reveals, the smoking-permitted area - even when confined to the back door near the rubbish bins - is often where the real social action is.
"It's where a lot of vital information is passed," says Sarah Ridgard, who has worked in many offices.
"It can make non-smokers feel insecure. A them-and-us situation can develop. As a non-smoker, you can either join in or get
resentful." Here - have a smoke; smokers are beautiful!
October
30 - ROBERT
WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION: HOW ITS GRANTS INFLUENCE COLORADO'S STATE HEALTH
POLICY - "Since 1988, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation has spent more than $30 million on health care policy grants in the state of Colorado. In a state with a Department of Health Care Policy and Financing that has just 166 full-time equivalent employees and a legislature that looks closely at adding even one staff position, this is more than enough money to buy policy." From Foundation Watch, an enlightening article about the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,
prime funder of
antitobacco, and its role in shaping health care policy in just one state. We suggest that RWJ reconstitute itself as a political
party (instead of pulling the strings of the public health marionettes
from "behind the scenes"), so that people can have a chance to vote for - or against -- the people who are actually shaping public policy. That's what's supposed to happen in a democracy, isn't it? (… isn't it?)
October 30 - Reforming
Public Health - In recent years, the
public-health establishment in this country has occupied itself mainly
with being a nuisance. When the American Public Health Association hasn't
been busy harassing smokers and gun owners or declaring one or another
pesticide a menace to society, it's been issuing statements of solidarity
with the Communist Sandinista regime in Nicaragua.
Instead of protecting
citizens from deadly microbes, public-health workers were more and more
concerned with protecting people from themselves. Instead of food safety,
attention was now given to what people ate (or, God forbid, smoked).
Instead of vaccination, the focus was now on access to hospitals for the
poor. No one can
deny that once Public Health had an honorable place in society.
Those days are long gone as its mission changed from eradicating disease
to eradicating behavior its bureaucrats found too lower class. Like
a giant sponge, Public Health, soaks up oceans of public dollars while
dribbling out services the public doesn't want or need. This time of
crisis is exactly the right time to boot Public Health in its fat rear end and
whip it into shape.
October
30 - SPARE
THE AIR! BAN SMOKING - "Going to a park is
critical to the mental health of many residents, and they want to enjoy it
without having to deal with the risks of second-hand smoke," she
said. "People opposed to this made the same arguments when we were
banning smoking inside restaurants and bars. They don't have a good
case."
Thus speaks Jan Perry, the
Los Angeles city council member who wants to ban smoking from every square
inch of the city's parks. Read it and wonder at the mentality of
people who would put such a fool in power. Perry is not to
blame. She is doing as her patrons, the pharmaceutical companies,
decree. She does not have one valid point to make but in this era of
lethargy she doesn't have to make any valid points to get her way.
Should the city support
Perry's vicious law, smoking will continue in the city parks. Los
Angeles is not the first city to embark on the dangerous path of
apartheid. Other cities have banned smoking in portions of public
parks or even from city sidewalks. The primary result of these smoking
bans is that they provide a politically correct method to roust the
undesirables. Cities such as Palo Alto, Berkeley and Los Angeles that
are soooo sensitive to the homeless would never roust the homeless from
public places where they are a real nuisance. Laws forbidding smoking
in parks provide a cover for law enforcement to kick the homeless out of the
parks. The "good" people will never be ticketed for smoking.
The pioneer in outdoor
smoking bans was Alfred Muller, the mayor of Friendship Heights, a suburb of
Washington, DC., who attempted to ban smoking from all the town's sidewalks,
streets and parks. Muller's law never went into effect for various
technical reasons.
Alfred Muller is the poster
boy who accurately represents all rabidly anti-smokers. Soon after
banning smoking in his town, the good mayor was arrested for sexually
abusing a child, giving new meaning "for the children".
Miller pled guilty and is now on probation. His case proves once again
that anti-tobacco is a mental illness.
October
30 - DEAR GOVERNOR DAVIS - The
state of the State of California is not good. The huge surpluses are
gone. There is an energy crisis. The tourists are fleeing.
Governor Gray Davis is doing what governors should do in trying to build
morale and get the economy moving again. Unfortunately the state
legislature and a myriad of special interests are doing their best to bring
the state down further. A Southern California resident can see through
the smokescreen and sends some simple advice to the governor.
| Governor Davis,
I read in the
L.A. Times today that the state of California is projecting a
15% budget shortfall in the coming year. Here are a few things you
might do to mitigate the situation.
-
Tell the
folks at the California Department of Health Services to
stop wasting millions of tax dollars on their radio, TV., and
billboard ads. Vilifying "Big Tobacco" and
demonizing the five million Californians who smoke hasn't done a
thing to improve the health of the average citizen. I
trust that the DHS has more important concerns these days, such
as anthrax and bio-terrorism.
-
Repeal the
California Workplace Clean Air Act. You are aware that, since
the State of California prohibited smoking in restaurants and
taverns, over one thousand bars and restaurants have gone out of
business. Think of how this has impacted State revenues,
not to mention the damage done to the tourism industry.
-
Repeal Rob
Reiner's fifty cents a pack "for the children" tax.
Lawful tobacco sales in California have declined 30% since this
tax was enacted, mostly due to bootlegging and out of state
tobacco purchases. Sadly, of the ONE BILLION DOLLARS that
Mr. Reiner has collected in the last three years, not one penny
has found its way to "the children". Put an end to
this charade, and watch the people resume purchasing their
tobacco products in the State. This alone could bolster the
State's revenues by two hundred million dollars a year.
Thank you for
your kind consideration in the matter.
Mark Volovar
Los Angeles |
October
29 - GOOD NEWS FROM FLORIDA -
Reported by Wanda Hamilton:
Florida state legislators cut $14.5 million from the state
anti-tobacco campaign despite heavy lobbying, political threats and a barrage of
anti ads in state newspapers.
The legislature was meeting in a special emergency session
to make budget cuts because of a shortfall in state revenue. Given that the
state Senate also cut $118 million in public school money, $22.5 million in
prescription assistance for the elderly and made cuts in other essential
programs, the $14.5 million cut in the anti-tobacco money seems more than
justified. In fact, they should have cut it ALL.
Naturally, attack dog Matt Myers of the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation-funded Tobacco Free Kids put out many press releases (and media ads)
designed to intimidate Florida legislators and Governor Bush. Basically the PR
campaign set up the false dichotomy, "Are legislators FOR kids or for BIG
TOBACCO?" The usual. The American Cancer Society (also funded by Big
Pharma) joined in the TFK nastiness. Of course, since they use kids in the
Florida anti-tobacco program for fundraising events for the ACS, they certainly
don't want their supply of kid labor and kid lobbyists cut off because of lack
of funds to PAY these kids using state money.
But the legislators held firm and didn't cave in to the
usual intimidation from the Washington, D.C. based Tobacco Free Kids. Good for
them for growing a backbone!
October
29 - PLYMOUTH
SETBACK -
- "They don't have to worry about me," Dorsey
Carey of Handlebar Harry's said after the vote. "They put me out of
business."
- Michele O'Connor, a waitress at the Mayflower Restaurant
on Plymouth's waterfront, said the ban has cut her income by 60 percent and
forced her to seek employment in another field. I can't make it,"
said the single mother of two, who made up to $80 in tips for a seven-hour
lunch shift before the ban. She said she made only $22 Tuesday.
- "I don't need somebody to protect me from
second-hand smoke," said Marsha Wilson, a waitress at Handlebar
Harry's. "I've been doing this for 40 years and I'm not about to change
my profession. I'd like to make a living. I'd like to take care of my
household."
- "Open your own restaurant," said Michael
Pimental, owner of Ernie's Restaurant, "but let me run mine the way I want
to."
- "Patriotism means much more than displaying a
flag," John Bonasera said. "It means freedom. This smoking ban
takes away some of our freedoms. The smoking ban is un-American. Vote yes to
preserve our freedom."
And best of all: "I DON'T SEE ANY OF THOSE
PEOPLE [the smoking ban crowd] AT MY RESTAURANT," said Louise Houston,
owner of Handlebar Harry's.
With testimony such as the above it should be a slam dunk
for those who don't want or need the smoking ban. Wrong. The
prohibition crowd won the day. The bar and restaurant owners vow to
continue their fight for survival.
October
29 - DEADLY
NAILS -
Demonstrating yet again that grant junkies are completely oblivious
to national priorities, a bunch of them on a junket to San Francisco
issued a study that
finds danger lurking beneath those polished fingernails. The
veritable petrie dish of contagion hiding under fashionable nails makes
the researchers gag. The crisis must be addressed.
Vigorous
washing - at least 15 seconds - is mentioned as a solution but the
nanny who conducted the study has a much better solution, more in line
with America's drive to infantalize the country:
October
29 - BAYER
LOGO SHOWS DRUG FIRM, OTTAWA, "JOINED AT THE HIP, NDP LEADER SAYS
- From Canada, a thoroughly modern case of confusion over where the public sector ends and the private sector begins. What was an official Canadian government news release doing displaying a pharmaceutical company logo? For New Democratic Party leader Alexa McDonough, it was evidence that the government and the industry are "joined at the hip." Bold - and hypocritical - words from a political party whose provincial counterparts in British Columbia led the pack in
pharma-sponsored anti-smoking intolerance
and junk science just a few years ago. Canucks who vote for the NDP hoping for a clean-up of corruption will get what B.C. got - a ruined economy and a legacy of intolerant legislation unworthy of a free society. And, yes -- even more new-age confusion over what is public and what is private.
|