detnews.com home page

Advertising
Cars.com
Personals
JobHunter
Classifieds
Model Homes
Place an ad

Essentials
Editorials
Lottery
Weather
CyberSurvey
Search Engine
Back Issues
Site highlights

News Sections
Accent
Autos
Business
Careers
Casino Guide
Comics
Comic Books
Cyberia
Food
Homestyle
Joyrides
Letters
Metro
Money
Movie Finder
Nation/World
Next!
Obituaries
On Detroit
Pets
Rearview Mirror
Screens
Showtime
TV Listings
Voices

Sports Sections
Sports
Lions
Pistons
Tigers
Wings
College
U-M
MSU
State Colleges
High Schools
Motor Sports
Golf Guide
Scoreboards
Sports Talk
Wing Nuts

Contacts
By e-mail
Post letters
to The News

Person-
to-person
Staff
addresses

By phone
Departments
and editors

Circulation
Home delivery

Search


Wednesday, August 19, 1998

Editorials & Opinions Next Index Previous

Tobacco Road

The Food and Drug Administration lacks the authority to regulate tobacco products, a federal appellate court panel has ruled . The Clinton administration plans to appeal, and the issue appears headed for the U.S. Supreme Court. But the opinion delivered Friday is a welcome rebuff to this president’s routine abuse of regulatory power.

    By a vote of 2-1, a panel of the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals found that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) exceeded its statutory reach in 1995, when then-Commissioner David Kessler — with White House backing — declared nicotine a drug, and cigarettes subject to FDA control as a drug-delivery device.

    It is all well and good that eliminating smoking ranks near the top of the Clinton agenda. But the White House has repeatedly resorted to regulation to achieve tobacco restrictions that it failed to win from Congress. Even the best of intentions do not justify such imperial pretensions.

    As the appeals court put it: “At its core, this case is about who has the power to make this type of major policy decision.”

    A lower court initially upheld the FDA’s regulation of cigarettes, but invalidated as unconstitutional new restrictions on tobacco marketing — including a billboard ban.

    In contrast, the appeals court panel recognized that Congress explicitly and repeatedly has blocked the FDA from regulating cigarettes. It is the constitutional prerogative of Congress — not the president — to delegate regulatory authority to the FDA.

    As recently as this summer, in fact, Congress rejected a bill that would have granted the FDA jurisdiction over tobacco products — as it has 20 times before. Lawmakers also have amended the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act 69 times without extending FDA authority to smoking. Even past FDA commissioners have asserted time and again that the agency lacked jurisdiction.

    But this is an administration that has been impervious to the rule of law on more than one occasion. Just last month, a federal judge ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency manipulated data and violated rule-making procedures in declaring secondhand smoke a Class A carcinogen.

    The failure of Congress to crack down on tobacco products appears to reflect the nation’s ambivalence about smoking. Citizens are well aware of the health consequences of smoking, but they also are mindful that government nannyism creates more problems than it cures.

    Smoking rates have declined dramatically in the past two decades. Americans face a far greater risk from a president who defies the U.S. Constitution.



Copyright 1998, The Detroit News

Next Previous We welcome your comments. E-mail us at letters@detnews.com