THE DEFEAT OF HIPPOCRATES

Return to main page
Return to main page

Published on the Italian daily "Libero" on February 22, 2001, page 1. Translated with the permission of the author.

"I swear to pursue the defence of life, the protection of the physical and psychic health of man, and the relief of suffering. To those ends, I will inspire my every professional act with responsibility and constant scientific, cultural and social commitment. I swear to never deliberately commit acts that cause the death of a patient. I swear to abide by the ethical principles of human solidarity in all aspects of my activity".

You may have recognised it. It is the Hippocratic Oath. According to scholars, it is a document even more ancient than Hippocrates of Cos, to which tradition assigns the words. Those words have always been a reference for the ethics of medicine.

But the Third Millennium has begun with signs of linguistic confusion, the Babel of thought, and so even this founding stone of medical science vacillates under the hits of political correctness.

In fact, one can already die of political correctness. It has happened a few days ago in Melbourne, and the Skynews satellite has bounced the news to the four corners of the Earth.

The victim is a 56-year-old man, described thus: smoker, in need of a new cardiac valve to carry on with life. He was on the waiting list for a transplant days before Christmas. Then the doctors refused to operate. Why? Because he decided not to give up smoking.

Doctors and surgeons at the best hospitals in Melbourne told the Herald Sun that this is now common practice, to refuse transplants and lung reduction surgery, arterial bypasses and coronary operations to smokers.

Greg Snell, doctor of pneumology at the Alfred Hospital, reiterates: "We do intend to perform high-level surgery, including lung operations, to those who are addicted to nicotine."

On the same wavelength is Lou Irving, his counterpart at the Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, who states: "Why should taxpayers pay for smokers? Resources are wasted on somebody who contributes to his own destruction." But those who smoke are taxpayers, aren't they?

Yet in Australia's Alfred Hospital, transplants are authorised only if the patient has not touched a cigarette for at least six months: otherwise, he is abandoned to his destiny. Goodbye Hippocratic oath, goodbye "relief of suffering".

Only one voice dissented from what is already the official position of the Order of Physicians of kangaroo country: Julian Savulescu, from the Murdoch Institute of Paediatric Research. He stated that the refusal of transplants to smokers is not a solution. In fact, there are many diseases that can be attributed to the patient's lifestyle but have little to do with tobacco. "The idea of making people responsible for their diseases, and convincing them that they are paying the consequences of their actions may attract some, but it is actually selective discrimination," Savulescu said.

Unfortunately, he saw correctly. In the era of equal opportunity and of do-gooding at all cost, we have to come to terms with a new form of racism. Subtle, slimy, untrustworthy, it even lacks the intellectual honesty of the "old style" discrimination - repugnant, but proud to be so. Today, instead, we have to come to terms with a deformed image of reality - the reality served on the table by the TV news broadcasts, cooked by the press of the regime, and digested by parties and political "movements".

So, in the name of universal well-being, in the race towards the crazy dream of a society of good men by decree, we have started butchering all those categories of people we do not like. In the name of civil rights, we have removed the enslavers and the tyrants of the past, and replaced them with a Vaseline-coated dictatorship, a condescending tyranny which, every day, emanates brand new racial laws: it is the Therapeutic State. It is health nazism.

We are at the daily mercy of an "expertocracy". We chase these "wise ones" in the hope they will dictate the twelve tables of Utopia to us. And the wise ones, whether they are dressed in a doctor's white coat or the black shirt of the censor, are always ready to point their fingers to new scapegoats and toward the immolation of new vices or perversions -- to cleanse our consciences, and achieve Heaven on Earth.

Well, Lenin tried that already; there is nothing new under the sun. And now, as before, people are dying - but this time there is something more. The man who died in Australia is not just a victim of political correctness. His death represents the defeat of ethics - and that concerns all of us.

Alberto Mingardi