Jul. 21, 1998 >> 1:49 am GMT

 |  |
 |
The story below was selected from CNN Custom News - a new personalized service that delivers only the news that's important to YOU. Sign up now to receive your personal news stories, weather, sports scores, and stock quotes from over 100 different sources - all for FREE. If you're already a user, please login. |  |
Health & Medicine:Smoking
Class Action Against Philip Morris U.S.A., Other Companies, Dismissed on Appeal by New York Appellate Court
PRNewswire
16-JUL-98
NEW YORK, July 16 /PRNewswire/-- A New York appeals court today dealt a severe
blow to tobacco litigation plaintiffs by rejecting class certification in the closely watched New York
state class-action cases against the major cigarette manufacturers. In addition, the appeals court took the
extraordinary step of dismissing the underlying legal claims, thus throwing out the cases in their
entirety.
In unusually strong language, the court said the proposed classes of New York smokers
would be "unmanageable because of the individual issues" that would need to be resolved in
the cases.
The cigarette companies "have a due process right to cross-examine each (class) member, a
task that would take hundreds of years," the court said. "Even if the trial were
bifurcated (divided into separate phases) as plaintiffs propose, at some point it would be split
into millions of trials."
Additionally, the appeals court said the underlying legal claims of fraud and deceit were
legally flawed because the U.S. Supreme Court's Cipollone decision states that such claims are pre-empted
by federal cigarette labeling laws.
"Today's decision continues the trend of other state and federal decisions over the last
two years that have concluded smoking cases are particularly inappropriate for class-action treatment," said John
Mulderig, associate general counsel for Philip Morris. "The courts are consistently recognizing that a class
action of smokers could hopelessly clog a state or federal court's docket for years and
years.
"Also, we are especially pleased the court chose to dismiss the underlying claims on
their merits as well."
The ruling followed a series of recent important decisions in favor of the industry.
Last week, another New York appellate court overturned a class certification in a separate case,
sending the case back to the trial court for a further proceeding on whether the
plaintiffs had met the requirements for a class action.
On Monday, a federal court in Maryland dismissed a case brought by five labor-management
trust funds that sought to recover expenses of treating members who suffered from alleged smoking-related
illnesses.
Today's decision was in five consolidated cases, including Frosina vs. Philip Morris Inc.
/CONTACT: Ken Seda of Philip Morris, 212-878-2144/
(MO) CO: Philip Morris U.S.A. ST: New York IN: TOB SU: LAW
© 1998 Cable News Network, Inc. A Time Warner Company All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this information is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines.
Custom News is built on technology.
|