1999 Archive
(Click on Joe Camel for current Flash News)




DECEMBER 16, 1999

AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS NOT ABOUT TOBACCO: IT IS ABOUT JOY! - Australia's antismoking gangsters ban the sale of herbal cigarettes to minors. Not a problem: it is easy enough to make one's own and affirm one's independence - or get someone else to buy'em.

SYDNEY - "The state government today bowed to pressure and banned the sale of herbal "Ecstasy" cigarettes to minors, following fears the product could encourage drug use. They are already banned in Queensland and South Australia. The cigarettes, which have been freely available to children in New South Wales, were marketed with the slogan: "It smells like POT. Looks like POT. Relaxes like POT". The government today said it would introduce legislation to stop people under 18 buying the herbal cigarettes which have been promoted and sold as a marijuana substitute. Acting Health Minister Paul Whelan said the government would amend the Public Health Act to make it illegal to sell any herbal cigarettes to minors. Health Minister Craig Knowles last month ordered an investigation into the sale of herbal cigarettes in NSW when the availability of Ecstasy Herbal Cigarettes was discovered. Ecstasy Cigarettes are distributed in Australia by Trio Brothers Trading, a company currently based in Queensland. The labeling of these cigarettes indicate they contain ingredients such as damiana, wild lettuce, catnip, passionflower, mint, and other herbal substances."

DECEMBER 15, 1999

CANADIAN ALDERMAN TEMPTED TO TAKE UP SMOKIG TO SHOW HIS INDEPENDENCE - Alderman Jon Lord of Canada (a non-smoker) says "I have been so fed up with the rhetoric of anti-smokers I've been tempted to take up smoking just to show my independence." (Calgary Sun, 12-10-99, "Smoke Scream").

Indeed. Common sense is still around. Be independent! Be smoking! It is the biggest silent statement you can make -- especially when you do it under an anti-tobacco cartel poster or a no-smoking sign.

DECEMBER 15, 1999

LOS ANGELES FILM CRITICS ASSOCIATION CATERS TO ANTI-TOBACCO CARTEL - LOS ANGELES - On December 11th, the Los Angeles Film Critics Association on Saturday named "The Insider," the best picture of the year. The film also took best actor and supporting actor awards. Russell Crowe, named best actor of the yearlast week by the National Board of Review of Motion Pictures, got the nod for playing a cigarette company employee-turned-whistleblower who blasted his former bosses on "60 Minutes." Christopher Plummer was named best supporting actor.

The movie bases its story on a false representation of events to cater to an agenda of national propaganda against the tobacco industry. The Los Angeles Critics Association, has lowered its standards for the occasion, and it wants to send a message to the nation and to the tobacco industry.

The message is: "The truth does not matter. We promote frauds and slander if that makes us money."

DECEMBER 11, 1999

HOW BUREAUCRACY PROTECTS THE FRAUDS OF THE ANTI-TOBACCO CARTEL - Following is a short note from Marty Ronhovdee, reader and contributor of FORCES. It refers to the most recent fraud of the anti-tobacco cartel's National Cancer Institute, that has recycled a debunked CAL/EPA "study" on the "terrible" effects of second hand smoke as if it was a new study.

We can see how deeply the anti-tobacco cancer has infiltrated bureaucracy. Or should we say how the cancerous bureaucracy if protecting the anti-tobacco frauds? Whichever way is right (probably both) it is clear that no citizen can get a straight answer from these gangsters, and that the only therapy against the antismoking social cancer is to perform legal and political surgery on the affected social tissues, and radiate what's left with negative money applications.

"Using the fact that the Cal/EPA report based its lung cancer stats from the EPA report alone is probably the best defense [against frauds]. Here in California, I've talked with a few Tobacco Control offices about the EPA report, specifically its ETS conclusions and Judge Osteen's ruling and each office told me that the ruling was in North Carolina only and did not affect the federal EPA report.

When I corrected them, telling them that Judge Osteen ruled in a federal court, they didn't believe me and then claimed that none of it mattered since Judge Osteen is in North Carolina and he is obviously on the side of the tobacco companies.

Trying to explain Osteen's background was of no use, they didn't want to hear it. I got the feeling that their latter response was a spur of the moment reaction and the Tobacco Control offices here are just being told that a North Carolina judge ruled against the EPA, no further information added."

NOVEMBER 30, 1999

HMOs, YOU SUPPORTED THE ANTI-TOBACCO SOCIAL CANCER, RIGHT? -- THERE! - ' A group of Mississippi lawyers who took on the tobacco industry are now going after five of the nation's largest health maintenance organizations. The lawsuit claims the HMOs failed to provide promised health care to 32 million people. The lawsuit was filed earlier this week in federal court in Hattiesburg, Miss. The lead attorney is Richard Scruggs, who led the lawsuits filed against the tobacco industry that resulted in a $246 billion settlement. According to a report in The Los Angeles Times, Scruggs says the class-action lawsuits are "to fix the broken promises the HMO industry has made to the people who entrust their very lives in these companies."

The lawsuits claim Pacificare Health Systems Inc., Foundation Health Systems Inc., Cigna Healthcare, Prudential Health Care and Humana Inc. violated the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The lawsuits accuse the five HMOs of offering financial incentives such as bonuses to physicians who restricted their patients' access to expensive health-care treatments. Alan Hoops, chief executive of Pacificare, says litigation will drive up health care costs for patients. Fred Laberge, a spokesman for Aetna/US Healthcare, which recently purchased Prudential, says there's no basis for the allegations. '

Enjoy, you imbeciles! For more information on this topic, Click here

NOVEMBER 10, 1999

HAS THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY FOUND SOME BALLS ON ITSELF? - Brown & Williamson have been taking a poll of filmgoers at movie houses who have viewed the Insider movie in Los Angeles and 6 other major cities.

The poll will help B & W decide if they should file a libel suit against the Disney Corporation and Touchstone Pictures. Martin Feldman, an analyst for Saloman, Smith Barney believes the likelyhood of B & W filing a case against Disney "is overwhelming."

Could it be that the tobacco industry has discovered some testosterone in its evirated self? That would be welcome news, certainly worthy of support!

OCTOBER 20, 1999

THE ABSURD SITUATIONS CREATED BY THE TOBACCO SETTLEMENT - What else but a lawsuit about tobacco is new in the USA? A group of importers and distributors of gray-market cigarettes is suing to overturn the $206 billion settlement between the tobacco industry and 46 states, and the separate settlement with Texas, claiming that the agreements are effectively driving them out of business. The plaintiffs are five companies that buy wholesale cigarettes made by U.S. companies intended for export. They then sell the cigarettes in the United States, profiting from markedly lower wholesale prices outside the country. (The National Law Journal -- For complete story, see Suit Challenges Big Tobacco Deal).

Of course, bankrupcy of tobacco-related businesses is what the anti-tobacco gangsters want (or claim to want). Of course, as soon as all legal tobacco businesses are out of the picture, or fully controlled by anti-tobacco, the (real) drug cartel will be quite interested to a 300 million dollar a day market. Since the drug cartel has the methods and the "language" the anti-tobacco cartel can understand, maybe the two cartels will even respect each other... especially since the US is already losing the war on drugs!

OCTOBER 13, 1999

MORE SETTLEMENT MONEY TO GO FOR SMOKING-UNRELATED ISSUES - Republican Governor Owens is using the loot Tobacco Settlement funds to finance his "Read to Achieve" program -- what happened to the care of sick smokers and the phantom "tobacco-related disease? Still anybody out there believes that the sacking of the tobacco industry and its customer has something to do with health?

The program is an initiative that would set aside $20 million annually to ensure that every child in Colorado will learn to read and comprehend at grade level by the time the child completes the third grade. 50 percent of all students that begin grade school will not graduate from high school. Endemic ignorance is a sad state in the US, and it tends to explain why both public and politicians are so easily bamboozled by the frauds of the anti-tobacco cartel. Unfortunately, the New Slaves of the US (smokers) are passively paying this abuse as well. (source: PR Newswire)

OCTOBER 13, 1999

FEARFUL OF LAWSUITS, COLT FIREARMS STOPS THE SALES OF GUNS - Anti-gun bullying works. In fact, all bullies everywhere are having the time of their lives, nowadays. Fearful of lawsuits, Colt Firearms, the legendary US gun manufacturer, has announced that at the end of October it will stop production of all commercial firearms.

The anti-gun activists and their lawyer bullies are making rapid progress in the suppression/removal of constitutionally-guaranteed US freedoms. We all know that criminals don't need to register guns and don't care about the law - but this is not the target of the new United States regime. The real purpose is to DISARM THE CITIZEN so that, as it is for smoking, drinking, and many other liberties, the state can control the citizen much more effectively -- and repress any reaction against the forthcoming socialist state control with the force of a very well-armed state when it deems it necessary. The contempt of the new fascist (communist?) American regime for the US Constitution is turning into facts -- that is, into its practical elimination.

SEPTEMBER 21, 1999

FLORIDA: ANTI-TOBACCO CARTEL TRIES AGAIN - The anti-tobacco gangsters and their shark lawyers cannot let billions of dollars escape their fangs. And, in the current state of political intimidation, a Florida Court cannot easily yield to justice and common sense.

Florida Court Will Reconsider Ruling That Favors Tobacco Firms in Lawsuit The Wall Street Journal reports, "A Florida state appeals court reopened the threat of huge punitive damages against tobacco companies in a class-action lawsuit by saying it will reconsider a ruling it made two weeks ago. The earlier decision had been considered an important victory for cigarette makers. Florida's Third District Court of Appeal on Friday vacated its Sept. 3 order requiring that smokers' claims for punitive as well as compensatory damages in the suit be heard individually. The court said it will hear oral arguments on the issue Sept. 30. If the judges change their stance, the so-called Engle case filed against the country's top five tobacco companies could again pose a significant danger to cigarette makers. "In the absence of another favorable ruling for the industry, Engle once again becomes threatening," said Martin Feldman, a tobacco-industry analyst at Salomon Smith Barney in New York." [News first reported in JUNKSCIENCE]

SEPTEMBER 16, 1999

THE ANTI-TOBACCO CARTEL HAS GOOD REASONS TO WORRY ABOUT THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW - The anti-tobacco cartel is concerned that the recent Rush Limbaugh show concerning the Victoria MacDonald article may have consequences on its agenda.

Victoria MacDonald, health correspondent of the British Telegraph, published an article on March 8th, 1998 containing allegations about an attempt by the World Health Organisation to conceal the results of a major study on second-hand smoke. The study was the second-largest study ever performed on the effect of second-hand smoke. After many years and huge sums spent, the study returned a negative verdict on the dangers of second-hand smoke. In fact, it even showed a protective effect.

Now the anti-tobacco cartel (of which ASH is a vocal operative), is busy working to dispel the effects of the glimpse of truth that made it through the information iron curtain existing to protect the frauds on the negative effects of tobacco.

But in the US, Rush is not afraid to unearth this issue again. After all, considering the monumental lie that depicts second-hand smoke as a danger, as well as the WHO's political agenda and integrity (ha!), the attempt by the WHO to hide one of the proof of its frauds seems more than reasonable to us.

For more information on secondhand smoke click here.

SEPTEMBER 14, 1999

JUNK SCIENCE CRITICIZED IN JAMA? -- INCREDIBLE!!... WHAT'S WRONG? -- JAMA is publishing a critique on the junk science it is popularizing. Now, this is certainly something to remember! There is an absolute conflict of interest between anti-tobacco corruption, its frauds, and this publication -- certainly an aberration. What's wrong? What is JAMA doing highlighting the truth?

Meta-analysis technique criticized in JAMA A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (Sep. 15) throws cold water on the use of the statistical technique known as "meta-analysis." (Meta-analysis involves combining multiple statistically weak studies into a single, more statistically powerful study. It gained a great deal of notoriety when used by the Environmental Protection Agency in its controversial, and now overturned, 1992 risk assessment that concluded secondhand smoke was a human carcinogen.) The JAMA study reported that risk estimates were "exaggerated" by 35 percent when clinical trials with open outcome assessment (i.e., researchers knew which patients received drugs and which received placebos) were included in a meta-analysis. The researchers conclude, "... the lack of well-performed and adequately sized trials cannot be remedied by statistical analyses of small trials of questionable quality." An accompanying editorial notes, "If the quality of the component studies of a meta-analysis is poor, then a precise summary of those poor studies in unjustified... a meta-analysis may not only be deceptively precise, but may yield misleading results." So what does this say about the EPA meta-analysis of secondhand smoke? The studies combined by the EPA were case-control epidemiology studies -- a much more inferior study design than clinical trials. [News first reported in JUNKSCIENCE]

JUNE 6, 1999

FLORIDA: THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION REDUCES PARASITISM - The St. Petersburg Times reports that the Florida anti-smoking campaign was forced to eliminate 11 of its 31 staff positions and cut back hours for teens who worked part-time on the program. While the anti-tobacco cartel will take care of its own by offering to the 11 people other jobs within the Department of Health (thus still getting the taxpayers to pay for parasitic jobs), the budget for the program was recently cut by the Legislature from $70 million to $32 million.

The parasites are worried: "It's troubling to see a tobacco prevention program that is more effective than any program in the country struggle for its life," lied Ralph DeVitto, lobbyist for the American Cancer Society. State officials said the "Truth" [which one?] ads would still be produced, but they will have less money to work with. The marketing staff was cut from four to two, and the marketing director was let go.

Good going, Mr. Bush!

(Source: Julie Hauserman, "Anti-Smoking Program Takes Hit," ST. PETERSBURG TIMES, June 3, 1999, p. B1.)

 


May 25, 1999

ANTI-GUN CARTEL = ANTI-TOBACCO CARTEL - This should make hairs stand up! The "progressives" are now using the same tactic on pro-gun people as they use on pro-smokers or smoking supporters. As Media Research reports: "More Rosie vs. Tom. Tuesday morning MRC Webmaster Sean Henry will post an extended excerpt from the May 20 Rosie O'Donnell attack on Tom Selleck over his ties to the NRA. Last Friday we posted a couple of news stories with clips from the show, but since then MRC analyst Jessica Anderson managed to obtain a tape of the original Rosie O'Donnell Show from which we've now taken a clip." To see the excerpt in RealPlayer format, go to: http://www.mediaresearch.org/news/biasvideo.html

 


May 25, 1999

JAPAN TOBACCO PURCHASES RJR - Japan Tobacco has purchased RJR International tobacco. RJR will still have its domestic tobacco business. Apparently, this was a necessary move not only to get cash (RJR was heavily in debt from its acquisition of Nabisco and from the lawsuits, and lacked cash), but also necessary in order to spin off Nabisco from RJR Tobacco. This separation will also protect the food part from any legal liabilities on tobacco's part. Ultimately, this is supposed not only to protect the company, but to increase stock prices.

As a result of its acquisition of RJR International, Japan Tobacco is now the third largest tobacco company in the world.

 


April 3, 1999

KALIFORNIA: THE CONSEQUENCES OF PROPOSITION 10, AND OF TOBACCO OVER-TAXATION - CORONA, Calif. (source: AP) - "Four armed men tied up 15 employees at a warehouse on Wednesday and escaped in a big-rig truck loaded with $1 million worth of tobacco products, police said. No one was injured in the robbery during which four men in hoods entered an employee entrance shortly before 5 a.m. It was not clear whether the stolen load consisted of cigarettes, cigars or other types of tobacco. The robbers forced some workers to load the goods onto a truck before they were bound with tape and robbed of personal belongings. Corona is 50 miles east of Los Angeles."

What will happen to this tobacco? It does not take a rocket scientist to figure this one out -- SMUGGLING! And for any smuggled cigarette purchased, the Kalifornia anti-smoking bastards won't get their cut, though they can alway fool the public by claiming that "a new study shows that smoking in Kalifornia has actually dicreased" -- and ask for more taxpayers' money to keep up the good job...

March 2, 1999

YOU'VE GOT IT ALL WRONG, PALS! -- (Source of the original news: Associated Press/Infobeat) - MEDIA, Pa. - 'Five friends gather to make a high school health video about the dangers of smoking and drugs.'

Of course, what else is new? Bashing and lying on smoking is the favorite sport today for much of the youth. It gets time off from the already poor education in schools, and gets political grades for being good, brainwashed citizens.

'Ten days later, the girls die when their car plows into a pole. In the bloodstreams of four, including the driver, are traces of a chemical named difluoroethane. Inside the crumpled car, troopers find a can of "Duster II," a spray used to clean computer keyboards. Its ingredients include difluoroethane. The coroner's findings put the teens on a list of 240 people who have died from "huffing" inhalants since 1996. But studies and doctors who treat teen-agers say their subjects tell them huffing, also called "sniffing" or "wanging," is the easiest high to get and easier to conceal than alcohol, marijuana or tobacco.'

Wrong, pals! It was secondhand smoke! Didn't you know that secondhand smoke contains 3,000, 4,000, 5,000 (the sky -- like fantasy -- is the limit) most of them in quantities so huge, they can't even be measured?

Now, these quantities can cause all kinds of calamities, from cancer to asthma, from hemorrhoids to car accidents. But these huge quantities also have tremendous advantages: they make rich dishonest, corrupted scientists, and enable politicians and anti-tobacco cartel activists to fool people, and implement smoking bans -- and tax smokers to death.

Obviously, the healthy, puritanical, intolerant anti-tobacco, anti-fat, anti-alcohol youth of anti-everything America has found a new way to cheat the system.

Proof once again that more repression and control is in order. Let's get them!

February 27, 1999

CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES: ANTISMOKING FASCISTS - Reuters reports that in its first month of operations, the crew of the antismoking fascists Carnival Cruise Lines' new ship MS Paradise have put nine passengers ashore for violating the ship's repressive no-smoking policy. The rules, which passengers must sign before boarding, say that anyone caught smoking will be dropped off at the next port and must find their own way home. "It's very easy on a nonsmoking ship to detect smoke," a Carnival spokesman said. "Some of them were caught on deck late at night. Others were caught in their cabins." To reinforce the rule, the line is considering adding a $250 "fumigation charge" to violators' bills. Readers, remember: Carnival cruise Lane is a fascist organization that violates smokers' human rights. Carnival Cruise Lines has other ships where smoking is allowed by grace of the management. DO NOT patronise ANY cruise with this organization. Last year, they already reported a drop in business. With some luck, we may be able to put these people out of business once and for all.

February 14, 1999

WE STOLE IT - YOU CANNOT TAKE IT, YOU THIEF! - STATES SAY TOBACCO MONEY BELONGS TO THEM - WASHINGTON (AP) - Lawmakers and state attorneys general said Thursday they would use both legislation and lawsuits to deny the federal government any part of the billions of dollars states won from the tobacco industry. "We worked long and hard to get this money for our respective states. Fair is fair," Ohio's attorney general, Betty Montgomery, said at a Capitol Hill news conference. The administration said in 1997 it was entitled to part of any settlement the states reach with tobacco companies because the states were trying to recover Medicaid money spent on smoking-related illnesses. The federal government pays the states for at least half of Medicaid in every state.

February 14, 1999

SOME SIGN OF COMMONSENSE, AND HONESTY? - FLORIDA TOBACCO DECISION OVERTURNED - TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) - A Florida appeals court has overturned a landmark $1 million award to the family of a smoker who died of lung cancer. In June, a Jacksonville jury ordered Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. to pay the family of Roland Maddox $1 million. In an unsigned one-paragraph order, the appellate court vacated the award Friday and ordered the case transferred to either Palm Beach County or Broward County in south Florida and not Jacksonville, some 275 miles away. The appeals court did not explain its decision. But two months after the $1 million award, it said the case should have been tried in south Florida, near Maddox's hometown.

February 14, 1999

MORE SIGNS OF COMMONSENSE, AND HONESTY? - TOBACCO "VICTIMS" UNABLE TO SUE - By Melanie Harvey - A group of lung-cancer sufferers was yesterday refused permission to sue two tobacco companies.

High Court judge Mr Justice Wright decided not to exercise his power to allow the action against Gallaher and Imperial Tobacco to continue after it was brought outside the legal time limit. The plaintiffs in eight test cases had lodged their claims more than three years after being diagnosed with lung cancer, one missing the time limitation by 24 years.

They had asked the judge to exercise his discretion under the 1980 Limitations Act to allow the action to proceed but in a judgment at the High Court sitting in Liverpool he refused that application.

Mr Justice Wright said: "The conclusion I have arrived at in each case is that it would not be appropriate for me to exercise my discretion to allow the cases to continue. Each of the applications must be refused."

Had it been successful, the application would have paved the way for a larger group of lung-cancer sufferers, who lodged claims more than three years after diagnosis, to sue the two firms. Now, 14 sufferers of an original group of 52 will proceed with compensation claims against the firms in a trial due next year.

After the judgment was handed down, Martyn Day and Irwin Mitchell, the solicitors representing the plaintiffs, issued a joint statement. "Obviously many clients will be disappointed . We now have to consider this very carefully to determine how next to proceed."

A Gallaher spokesman said: "We were always confident we would get this judgment. We clearly welcome it."

The lung-cancer sufferers had claimed at an earlier hearing at the High Court in London that the eight suffered injury because all the cigarettes with which they were supplied between the 1950s and 1970s contained far more tar than was reasonably safe or appropriate.

 

 


> BACK TO FORCES MAIN PAGE <