September
21, 2006
[15:30
GMT]
- Smokers, beware when
traveling to India! -
French reporter roughed up for lighting up
- On lighting up a cigarette recently, a vacationing
French reporter was physically assaulted by local officers in India. As of this
news report, the journalist and his wife were still waiting to get their
passports back in order to leave the country. The officers who jumped on the man
after he lit up claim they thought he was a terrorist (sure). "Just before
boarding I wanted to smoke and lit a cigarette. But suddenly this officer came
and slapped me. Some others roughed me up and hit me on my legs," Ugin
alleged. No doubt the American anti-smoking movement will find it gratifying
that their message is taken so seriously in countries where the authorities feel
a little less constrained than they usually do in the States.
March
22, 2004 -
Anti-smoking
Councilman Blames The Victim - A Pueblo bar owner says the smoking ban that forced his female employee
outside is directly responsible for her rape. When the woman went
outside the Irish Brew Pub for a cigarette break last month, a 33-year-old
man attacked her, dragged her into an alley and raped her.
Owner Ted Calantino says people like
his employee wouldn't be exposing themselves to dangerous situations if it
weren't for the recent smoking ban.
 |
|
Bill Sova,
anti-smoker and rape apologist |
City councilman Bill Sova's response to
this deplorable incident is to label Calantino's outrage over his
employee's rape as somehow "inappropriate." Sova, an
ardent supporter of prohibition, then goes on to lay the blame on
Calantino for not providing a secure work environment.
Calantino, Bova advises, should hire security and install extra
outdoor lights to make sure such a deplorable event never reoccurs.
Calantino is expected to hire more security
and install an expensive outdoor light system to protect his workers who
used to be able to smoke indoors in comfort and safety. He's
expected to pay for all this even while his business is declining because
of the smoking ban. Had Pueblo not stuck its nose into places where
it wasn't needed, the unfortunate woman would not have been raped and Bill
Sova would not find himself in the awkward position of blaming those
victimized by his bad public policy.
Bill Sova is the face of anti-tobacco.
A self-righteous demagogue who imposes his narrow moral view on others
while refusing to take responsibility for his actions. The rape
victim should get a lawyer and sue the city of Pueblo.
November
10, 2003 -
Hypochondriac
On A Rampage - "I just can't stand smoking," Ward said, adding half his
family has died prematurely due to cigarettes. "(Second-hand smoke)
makes me short of breath and it gives me headaches."
Though he hasn't been diagnosed with any respiratory disease, Ward
said he possesses a "chemical sensitivity." A strong perfume
could cause him the same problems as lingering smoke. Ward
said buses most often smell like ashtrays after sitting idle and void of
riders at a stop, though he has seen drivers light up while driving with
passengers. He's been complaining to CityLink administration over the last
four years.
Don Ward is "a self-described eccentric." Don thinks, just thinks, a bus driver could have been smoking, before Don got on his bus the other day. He wants the driver punished. How does the transportation service management respond? There will be an immediate investigation. The driver may face written warnings, suspension, or termination.
Don Ward plans further complaints in the future. He doesn't like most of his fellow passengers. Ridership should be limited to soft-spoken persons who never curse. Furthermore, he says the smell of someone wearing cologne threatens his health, just as much as the smell of someone who has smoked.
Wait till the transport service gets wind of that. They could save a lot of paperwork by firing all their drivers right now. Give the bus keys to Don Ward. Don could establish a route running by Mike Bloomberg's, Ev Koop's, and Henry Waxman's houses. The unemployed drivers, can join the rest of us vulgar stinkers, in migration to Belize. Things aren't quite so "eccentric" in Belize.
November
5, 2003 -
Mayor
Bloomberg Flips Out - Bloomberg also compares the number of deaths caused by secondhand
smoke to the number of people killed in the World Trade Center collapse.
Doubling his previous estimates, the mayor says that 2,000 New
Yorkers die each year from secondhand smoke.
"Think
about all the press attention to 9/11," he says. "That number of
people die every year in the city from secondhand smoke.
Consumed with hatred for smokers, Mayor Bloomberg compares
them to the rabid murderers who rammed two jets into the World Trade
Center. Rather than face the fiasco that his smoking ban has brought
to innocent people he doubles the unsupportable number of deaths caused by
secondhand smoke yet cannot site the name of one of these thousands
supposedly killed by smoking New Yorkers. Invested in pimping for
the nicotine cessation distributors he justifies his prohibition by
slandering millions of citizens who are still reeling from the disaster of
September 11, 2001.
Each year of his reign brings more embarrassment to
America's largest and most important city. He appears to be a man
who has totally lost his tether to reality. His hatefulness is
repugnant but far worse for the image of his city is his total
transformation into a clownish buffoon. He actually sounds
crazy. Instead of the buoyant optimism that used to define New York
City, Mayor Bloomberg brings a negativity that is toxic. New York
has persevered through horrific bad times and it will survive Michael
Bloomberg. The question, however, is why should it keep this lunatic
in office?
After Bloomberg bulldozed through his smoking ban a
long-time tobacco critic
blasted
his contention that secondhand smoke is harmful to nonsmoking
customers at restaurants and bars. Although she was not the only
credentialed expert who blew holes through the "science" behind
the secondhand smoke scare, her words are important because she, as an
individual, despises smoking and, as a resident of the city, is quite
happy not to have to be exposed to low-class smokers.
June
20, 2002 -
Somewhere
In Hell Adolph Hitler Is Smiling - A seven-year veteran of the police force has recently been fired for smoking
tobacco products in violation of a little-known state law banning smoking
among public safety officials.
Officer
Wayne Jeffrey was officially terminated from his position on May 29 after an
internal investigation proved he had been smoking tobacco products during
his tenure with the department. The
matter was first brought to Fall River Police Chief John M. Souza’s
attention this spring by an anonymous letter.
Another report notes that
Jeffrey had been on the force for seven years, starting as a 35-year-old
rookie, leaving a higher-paying job working sheet metal to take the post.
During his time on the force, he earned his associate's degree in criminal
justice. He was awarded a trophy for his work on the city's bike
patrol. His career now is ended because he smoked on his own
time. The state of Massachusetts is no better than the Nazi regime it
bases such laws on.
March
24, 2002 -
California
Councilwoman To Senior Citizens: Go To Hell - At a meeting beginning at 6 p.m. Tuesday at City Hall, Councilwoman Claudia
Bill-de la Pena plans to ask her colleagues to direct staff to investigate
whether the city can require the housing authority to declare Oak Creek a
smoke-free environment. Bill-de la Pena said the smoking prohibition
is aimed at protecting public health, not at destroying a smoker's rights.
|

|
|
Claudia Bill-de la Peña
- Had it with the oldsters |
"This policy does not
discriminate against smokers," she said. "They will be allowed to
smoke, just not in their apartments."
And who, Claudia Bill-de la
Peña, is going to bash in the doors to their homes, slap the cigarettes
from the old people's mouths and drag them out into a rainstorm so they can
have a smoke?
A more efficient method, and one
that surely would find favor with Claudia Bill-de la Peña, is to herd the
old folks into a box car and ship them down the rail to the nearest
concentration camp. Turn their apartments over to the clean living,
productive and obedient members of the collective. Who wants to see
all those pathetic, useless old smokers anyway?
May
28, 2002 -
Smoke
get in your eyes? - The
appeal of antitobacco to the lowest instincts of humanity, and the twisting of
logic and civil rights are explored in this article by William F. Buckley, Jr. "Have
the long fingernails of the state's smoking laws scratched up your life? … We
asked a veteran legal philosopher to touch down on the question, Is smoking a
civil right? His answer: ‘That's easy. Your civil right nowadays is for others
not to smoke.’ Mixed up with the question, Do you have a right to smoke? is
another, which is: Do we want a nation of whistle-blowers?" About the
"random inspections" designed to terrify and repress those who
exercise their right to smoke in public places and offices, Buckley
comments: "If you tell on somebody who is hiding income from the IRS,
and the IRS moves in and successfully prosecutes, the informer is (we are told)
slipped a little change. Maybe it is so in the tobacco-detection game, though
the practice may differ from city to city, state to state." That is
what America, example for the West, has become – and some are even proud of
that reality – thus confirming the appalling existence of this social
aberration: the sick, "healthist" society. Has the U.S.S.R. won after
all? And, are we willing to let it win all the way?February 15 -
Mainlining
Nicotine - "Two studies designed to measure the
strength of the habit of smoking versus the craving for nicotine have shown
that low-nicotine cigarettes could possibly be used in smoking cessation
therapy to satisfy the overwhelming urge to light a cigarette. According to
the studies, led by Jed E. Rose, director of the Nicotine Research Program
at Duke University Medical Center, the urge to light a cigarette, in some
cases, can be more compelling than the physical need for a nicotine fix.
We've gone full circle. In the
beginning C. Everett Koop, former U.S. Surgeon General, decreed that
nicotine was addicting. People don't smoke for pleasure, he said, they
smoke because they must. Addicts must switch from cigarettes to
nicotine patch and gum, thereby opening the doors to a flood of
pharmaceutical nicotine.
Over a decade later and smoking rates remain
constant for adults, although skyrocketing for minors. Time to change
tactics. Now the pharmaceutically funded grant junkies are decreeing
that smokers smoke because they enjoy the oral, visual and scented pleasures
of tobacco smoke. The new wave of cessation theory suggests that
nicotine-free cigarettes, supplemented by drug company nicotine is worth
pursuing.
What seemed a joke only a few months ago --
doctors advising smokers to smoke cigarettes denuded of nicotine quaffed
down with a drink of liquid nicotine, followed up with nicotine gum --
is no longer funny.
Dr. Rose and his minions conducted a study
that reads like a B-movie script about mad scientists running amok.
Subjects smoked varying combinations of low-tar/low-nicotine and
high-tar/low-nicotine cigarettes. Blood was drawn to compare levels of
nicotine. Into the mix, Dr. Rose explored the effectiveness of
mecamylamine, an anti-hypertensive drug.
But for a jolt that hits the spot, nothing
can top the intravenous injection of nicotine right into the bloodstream.
Rose's mainlining experiments on his human subjects produced mixed results
but if all goes well, the recalcitrant smoker may be prescribed a pack of
nicotine-free smokes, "de-nics" to those in the trade, along with a nicotine
vial and hypodermic.
What is revolting is not the intravenous
nicotine, although that has to be a new low, but the pathological intensity
of Rose and his cronies in figuring out the optimum combo of de-balled
smokes and drug company nicotine. So much time and expense on such a
bizarre endeavor. The experiments are weird, vile and disturbing.
Dr. Mengele, meet Dr. Rose.