|
|
|
Continuous Assessment of Indoor Fine Particles With a Portable NephelometerBy Stephen Stewart, PhD., P. Eng.
The air quality in restaurants, hotels and other hospitality
establishments has recently become the subject of public debate. The
central issue has been whether smoking should be completely banned from
such establishments. Some city councils have taken action to implement
bans - with varying effect- and others have not yet decided one way or
the other. The new Workers Compensation Board occupational health and
safety air quality regulations have the potential to transcend these
municipal deliberations, which have been primarily customer orientated,
by mandating minimum air quality requirements for people employed in the
hospitality industry throughout the province.
The issue in question can now be more precisely stated: Is environmental
tobacco smoke the only air contaminant of major significance in
hospitality establishments, and can air quality standards be achieved by
measures such as designated smoking and non-smoking areas, increased
ventilation flow rates, or air scrubbers, or is a total smoking ban
required.
The following paper describes the results of a study completed in 1996
in Vancouver. The paper first describes the measuring technology to be
used (portable integrating nephelometer), and establishes acceptable
correlations between this technology and other accepted methods. The
particular advantage of the portable integrating nephelometer is that a
continuous log of air quality data is possible and these data can be
automatically downloaded to a personal computer for analysis.
Particulate concentrations were then measured in restaurants, bars and
kitchens, and were found to be affected by factors which included
smoking policy, number of cigarettes smoked, and amount of cooking
activity. For restaurants with smoking and non-smoking sections,
measurements were made at the edge of the non-smoking section. This is
the worst-case situation for a non-smoking customer.
From the discussion of results we may infer the following points:
The study appears to constitute an excellent pilot for a much larger
study which could provide the information necessary for decisions about
how hospitality industry air quality standards can be achieved.
|
|
|