| Forces International | HEART DISEASE |
Back to main page |
BRIEF EDITORIAL Applause to Niemel et al and Whincup et al for recognizing the potential for confusion from adjusting for so-called established risk factors without thinking. All too often this is not the case. Some researchers clearly don't think at all about their ingrained presumptions, since it ought to dawn on them, for instance, that social class, by itself, does not cause any diseases. Yet they adjust for it like robots when analyzing risk factors which may actually be the cause of those socio-economic differences.Especially in regard to smoking, this bias is displayed over and over in the literature: Upon finding a new risk factor for CHD, the investigators automatically go, "Aha! Perhaps this is the mechanism we've been searching for all these decades, to explain how smoking causes heart disease!" And never is it proposed that "Perhaps this is a mechanism by which smoking has been falsely blamed for heart disease." Like automatons, they control their analyses of Helicobacter pylori and Chlamydia pneumoniae bacteria (HP and CP) for social class and smoking, heedless of the fact that HP & CP may well account for those social class and smoking differences, and thus they should not be controlled for because this obliterates the truly key facts! This is the iron tyranny that has stifled scientific thought for 30+ years. The unfortunate result of this mindset has been to devote countless dollars and research hours into "proving" that smoking causes various maladies, when real research on actual potential causes has fallen by the wayside. Still, there are rigorous scientists who understand the importance of performing honest and unbiased research. Following are several excellent examples.
12 AA pts, 3 accident victims, 9 coronary artery bypass pts. P 503 "Immuno-histochemical examination demonstrated chlamydial lipopolysaccharide-antigen in large amounts in the macrophages of the atherosclerotic plaques in all 12 aneurism specimens." All cultures negative. In past studies, only half of atherectomy tissue CP+ v ALL aneurisms CP+. P 504 "Despite direct evidence on the presence of C pneumoniae in all 12 patients with abdominal aortic aneurisms, one patient had no C pneumoniae antibodies, and two had only low titers present in the sera. A similar finding was reported earlier; only 60% of the autopsy sera obtained from persons with atherosclerotic lesions positive for C pneumoniae contained demonstrable antibodies to C pneumoniae." May be bound & sequestered. THIS IS AN IMPORTANT STUDY: IT SHOWS THAT NOT ALL CASES OF CP INFECTION ARE DETECTED BY BLOOD TESTS. IN STUDIES, THIS WILL MAKE THE RISKS FROM CP LOOK SMALLER THAN THEY REALLY ARE.
Courtesy of Carol Thompson
08/23/93 |