SANCTIMONY SUITES THE ANTISMOKING SCUMAnswer to a reader who criticises us for a reply to a young man over two years ago! According to him, we did not do the “right thing” by pointing out the truth on smoking and tobacco and, even worse, we did not bestowed on him sanctimonious paternalism. Sorry, sir: antismoking is a social cancer and a fraud that is targeting especially the youth – and for that reason, we are making our best effort to make young people aware of how “public health” is conning them – to make them aware of a frightening upcoming reality that must be stopped: a word of pharmaceutical drugs and state surveillance where 100 years lived under the immoral control of the state are considered better than 70 lived as free people making their own decisions on lifestyle and values. And there is no junk science and sanctimony that is going to make us change our mind.
From:
George
George, I envision to be a young hot blooded kid, or a very immature old man who lived his life trying to be part of an under culture rather than to be a positive influence in our own society.
Under culture?
Are you referring to smoking, again? If so, I believe that antismoking is an
under culture gone amok because of pharmaceutical over-financing. No words required here but two: PROVE IT. The fact that you refuse to believe it makes no difference, people still die from prolonged cigarette smoking and they get sick from second-hand smoking.
I believe
what science demonstrates, not what suits my superstition. It
is you who
rely on
belief, here. People who don't smoke die too (cancer included)
- what do you think
is responsible for
it?... Concerning passive smoke, I get sick too at times - from the lies
that are told about it.
Deal! I have
smoked over a pack a day for 35 years now, and sometime I peak at 30 cigs a
day. Still do 8 flights of stairs without any heavy breath. I am 53; never
been in better health: 100% OK medical check up. And you? I go for
exchanging name, address and telephone number. Since you propose it, you go
first, but I will start with
my
name: Gian Turci. Write to this address for the exchange gianturci@forces.org;
I'll get it directly. Since we are
on the subject, I make
you
a counter-proposal: you keep on not smoking, and just wait... you
too are going
to die, wanna bet?! And I know I'll win that one! :-) And moreover, you are
going to die of a disease (except, of course, if you get driven over
by a truck). What are you going to blame?... So, I have no problem
whatsoever with your bet. George
I did already,
and I
still do -- and I am not sorry about that. I think you
are with
the BS you are spreading around. You should reconsider
as well,
as lives without pleasure are not worth living. And you (like
everybody else)
are not in a
position to lecture people on how to live their
lives. Simply
put,
mind your own
lousy
business
and be
as
miserable as you want - even delude yourself
about happiness!
Just don't ask anybody else to be like you, please! The kid asked for
advice, and he got it; he got the truth and a balanced view that made him
see the other side of the fraud, and
HE
will decide, then: he does not need to be told what to do. Given the same
conditions, I would counsel anybody else the same way. |
||