FORCES Tavern: We welcome you to The Tavern, you are welcome to browse and read, but please register to post.

Organic tobacco no safer

What are the differences between Epidemiology and Science? Why do politicians accept that Epidemiology is "science"?

Organic tobacco no safer

Postby jredheadgirl » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:00 pm

But.....but......I thought that it was all of those scary chemicals........??

http://tobaccoreporter.com/home.php?id=498&art=3097
jredheadgirl
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:42 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Organic tobacco no safer

Postby Ariel » Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:40 am

Is it that they really believe that consumers are complete morons (are you still allowed to say "morons">)

Or do they just do this to hassle tobacco companies any way they can?

The agreement follows Brown's contention that Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company may have misled consumers in advertising its "organic" or "100 percent organic" Natural American Spirit cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco, leading consumers to believe these products were less harmful than other tobacco products.


Are folks who sell "organic" food advertising it as "less harmful"? Is there any evidence to back this claim?
Ariel
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:22 pm

Re: Organic tobacco no safer

Postby jredheadgirl » Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:39 pm

Ariel wrote:
Are folks who sell "organic" food advertising it as "less harmful"? Is there any evidence to back this claim?


The same rules don't apply to tobacco Ariel because, yes, they think that we're morons (most likely).
jredheadgirl
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:42 pm
Location: Los Angeles


Return to Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron