|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What will occur in America soon is already occurring in the United Kingdom. The taxes are so high that, in addition to a growing smuggling problem, the country is now being inundated with shoddy cigarettes made in China. The United States experienced something similar during alcohol prohibition. It was called "bathtub gin". Prohibition doesn't work. High taxes don't work. Anti-tobacco making government policy really doesn't work.
See INSIDE
The oddity the author refers to is the federal suit against the tobacco industry. A legacy of the Clinton, administration, the suit was Bill Clinton's final attempt to bankrupt the tobacco industry. Both George Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft have reversed course and have not offered any good reason to kept this suit going. With far more important issues to deal with, persecuting cigarette companies and smokers is a waste of time and money.
In a story about how heavy drinking Dayton have drastically lower rates of liver disease and accidents, a few tidbits about smoking are uncovered. The discrepancy between anti-alcohol orthodoxy and the reality of the Dayton area baffle the experts but they do attempt to explain why smokers have lower cholesterol and heart disease and why the slothful smoker exercises more than nonsmokers and is sick no more frequently. The theories are hilarious and don't even rate a "B" for effort.
See INSIDE
The nerve of those pharmacists! Don't they know that only Big Drugs must profit from nicotine? Despite the weight of the Food and Drug Administration and the rants of Big Pharma's very own pocket congressman, Henry Waxman, some of the entrepreneurs vow to continue concocting and selling the ridiculous nicotine-laced lollipops and candy.
See INSIDE
Steven Milloy, junkscience.com, performs the task of the mainstream media by actually examining the study that fans the flames of the "epidemic" of college-aged drinking. In addition to statistical manipulation on a grand scale, the author of the study is on the board of directors of Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), a fact not noted in the frenzied coverage by newspapers. The dark arts of deception uncovered by Milloy are identical to the tricks anti-tobacco uses to advance its agenda.
Despite working in a snide comment, the LA Times, one of the more rabid of the anti-tobacco press, gets an A for exposing its readers to a reality that the zealots want to obliterate. How is it possible that this man is not dead? How is it possible that, at a fairly venerable age, is still at work creating beauty for the world? It's possible because smoking, even 3 packs a day, is just one of a myriad of factors that make up one's sate of health. It's doubtful that Paul Taylor "admitted" to smoking. With all his accomplishments and love of live he probably regards smoking as irrelevant.
Okay, New Yorkers, now is the chance to stand up and be counted. Join the Libertarian Party of Manhattan this Wednesday. Show up and receive a tax-free pack of cigarettes purchased from an Indian reservation in western New York. For address and time, click the Libertarian's link below. Featured speaker for the event will be Audrey Silk of NY Clash. Audrey is a veteran of the tobacco wars and has jousted with big-time anti-tobacco operatives on television and radio. She works tirelessly to run anti-tobacco out of New York City. Libertarian Party of Manhattan
Libertarian Alliance Director, Dr Chris R. Tame, says: "In the light of the ever-more blatant attack on civil liberties in this country - including the proliferation of camera surveillance systems, the increasing involvement of intelligence agencies in political surveillance and dirty tricks operations, the push for a national ID card and DNA database, the gradual abolition of common law liberties by the removal of jury trials, of the presumption of innocence, of the right of silence and of double jeopardy, and by the adoption of the EU's despotic corpus juris - this proposal is even more ominous. The government's claim that data would be processed only 'where necessary' is laughable - especially when one sees that their list of 'necessary' reasons covers every conceivable excuse for nanny statism, paternalism, censorship, socialism, prudery, Puritanism and prohibitionism. It is ironic that when the state has demonstrated that it is incapable of providing any 'public service' adequately, when it cannot defend its citizens from predators of every stripe, that is should be attempting to turn us into supplicants and serfs. The common argument that 'if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear' is absurd. In an age when health fascists have declared smoking to be a form of child abuse it is clear that everyone can be subjected to the prejudices of demented paternalists - whether of the fundamentalist religious nutters, the peddlers of PC pieties, the environmentalists, or the feminist anti-sex cranks. Your life style, your tastes, your sexuality, your political and social views, can be subjected to tomorrow's moral panic, propaganda scare campaign and witch-hunt and legislated as 'crimes' or as 'politically incorrect'. The citizens of Britain need to send a message to our would-be masters that we are not numbers, that we will not be pushed, filed, indexed, stamped, briefed, debriefed, or numbered - that our lives are our own. It is now clear that the 'social contract' has been broken by the state. Resistance to the usurpations of the state is both a right and a moral duty. It is the right, the duty, of all to resist and disrupt the state's data gathering and record-keeping ability, by whatever means are necessary".
Much of the current issue of the BMJ is devoted to the theme of the immense power of the pharmaceutical industry and its interference with science, politics, and behaviour control. The theme itself was selected because BMJ readers required it. Is the public slowly realising the corruption of the white Mafia? The times are certainly more mature, as the excesses and the frauds of antitobacco have metastasized in other fields, such as food and drinks. Most of the health Nazis advocate regulation of every aspect of life, but themselves have very little. As they love to examine the documents of the tobacco industry as a "public service", there is no mention of examining THEIR documents – never mind the frequent impossibility to verify the databases of those very studies that find an infinite amount of diseases, and "cost to society." As they accuse their opposition to be sold out to the tobacco industry (or other industries), they are fronts for Big Pharma. As they accuse Big Tobacco to corrupt governments, they have utterly corrupted ministries and departments of health around the world, and turned them into promotional centers of pharmaceutical products at the expense of the taxpayers. As it is always the case, those who rot accuse others of smelling bad.
The CDC has also upped the number of people "killed" from smoking by 40,000 which seems odd since the CDC and other components of the anti-tobacco cartel are constantly claiming that smoking rates are way down. It seems only yesterday that the huge price increase on cigarettes to pay the tobacco settlement was supposed to completely "reimburse" society (from "health-related" costs that were not proven in the first place). What has changed since 1998, the year of the tobacco settlement, and now? More financial raping: the anti-tobacco enterprise has been unsuccessful in diverting the bulk of the settlement funds to its own pocket. All new rounds of tax increases are written to benefit financially anti-tobacco special interests. While exorbitant tax rates are raising to obscene exorbitant tax rates, it is useful to report Wanda Hamilton's comments on the new extortion scheme: Yes, of COURSE the "new" CDC REPORT (NOT a study) was released just now to generate higher taxes on cigarettes. And of course the CDC has ignored all the studies showing that society has a net financial GAIN from smokers -- studies, I might add, that were done even before the increased taxes and the master settlement costs were imposed. The new increased taxes and the MSA cost mean that society is gaining even MORE net profit from smokers.Here are quotes from a few of the studies and experts CDC willfully ignored: "Smoking has apparently brought financial gain to both the federal and state governments, especially when tobacco taxes are taken into account. In general, smokers do not appear to currently impose net financial costs on the rest of society." Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, "The Proposed Tobacco Settlement: Who Pays for the Health Costs of Smoking?" Jane G. Gravelle, Senior Specialist in Economic Policy, Government and Finance Division, Updated Oct. 12, 1999. "A National Bureau of Economic Research study by W. Kip Viscusi [an economist and Harvard Law Professor] in the United States showed that when all costs and taxes were taken into account, each pack of cigarettes consumed saved society 83 [cents} == or $20 billion [US] annually." National Post [Canada], 1/22/99, "They didn't inhale?". "After all, the alternative to death from a smoking-related illness is not immortality and perfect health -- it is later death, and perhaps from a more costly illness... or larger nursing home costs... The message is fairly clear. An increased tax based on the costs smokers impose on nonsmokers has not been justified. The evidence indicates that smokers are already paying, or possibly more than paying, their way." Jane Gravelle and Dennis Zimmerman, economists at the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, Washington Post, 6/5/94, "The Marlboro Man." The CDC also ignored other such studies, one conducted by the Rand Institute, one published in the New England Journal of Medicine Oct. 9, 1997, and one published in Canadian Public Policy Sept. 1992. The latter study concluded: "Overall, as Table 5 indicates, smokers make a net overall contribution of $4.3 billion to the benefit of non-smokers [in Canada]." As for the increased 400,000 SAM figure also included in the "new" CDC report, see Levy and Marimont's rebuttal to CDC's defense of its SAMs even BEFORE the new inflation, exposing the manipulations: http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv22n2/fortherecord.pdf (PDF document. For a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader click here). For more complete information about the CDC "smoking-related" mortality saga, click here. For more information and data on the smokers' cost to society fraud, click here.
It's the 535 members of the United States Congress! The same group that cranks out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us in line.
Whether with their alcohol-fueled love songs or their love-fueled alcohol songs, Alkaline Trio will move you with something you've never seen before.
What's never been seen before is anti-tobacco getting royally fooled by people who took the morons' money to the bank, smoking all the way. Alkaline Trio was the featured act at Minnesota's Kick Ash Bash II thrown by the anti-tobacco goon squad Target Market. The smoking, cocktail and beer loving musical group is now the focal point in an effort to de-fund Target Market for its unclear concept of keeping kids from smoking and off the booze. For a report from the front, we link to Anti Target Market .
"We don't want to operate a Web site that would broadcast cigarette brand imagery, or images of adults smoking, to kids. This is in keeping with PM USA and PMI's efforts to reduce the profile of their marketing so that minors' exposure to tobacco imagery is reduced," said a spokesperson. And just how effective is PM's "good corporate citizenship" effort? Well, politicians still routinely damn the company for selling cigarettes and continue to raise taxes. Anti-tobacco pressure groups continue to slander the company, its customers and its products. The federal government continues its baseless suit and appears to want to drive it out of business. For a look at what PM's flaccid approach has wrought, take a look at one anti-tobacco groups rhetoric about the "new" Philip Morris. In fact, pretends to be a left-wing pressure group that exposes transnational corporate evil-doing but is in reality a left-wing pressure group whose only real target is the tobacco industry, especially Philip Morris. It's views are held by every anti-tobacco organization as well as a significant segment of the general population that pays any attention to the tobacco issue. The one, sure way to regain any respect from the public and policy makers would be to aggressively counter the bile and slanders in a way that causes immense pain to its enemies. The company has the resources to eliminate the anti-tobacco enterprise completely. Instead of cowering before groups and people that are despised by all thinking Americans, take off the gloves and bloody them.
Dan Cracraft, President of President of Freedom of Choice, Inc., a non-profit social organization, didn't let the grass grow under his feet. He organized the private clubs and whipped up opposition to the crazy scheme to mess with a cultural institution that has served Utah very well. (Click bar to access section)
The drug companies pay anti-smoking activists to clamor for smoking restrictions and higher tobacco taxes. Because these so-called grass-roots organizations supposedly are untainted by the profit motive, governments give them a credence that is unwarranted. Over time the anti-smokers eventually are able to get their proposals enacted. Smoking bans and higher taxes are designed to force smokers to quit smoking. Interweaved amongst the overblown heath-risk claims is the constant message that cigarettes are unbelievably addicting. The poor addicted smokers need help in quitting so the anti-smoking activists trumpet the wonders of nicotine gum, nicotine patches and anti-depressants such as Zyban. Health insurers and government health providers are urged to include these expensive cessation devices in their health coverage. In the United Kingdom, GlaxoSmithKline and the anti-tobacco activists have hit pay dirt. The government is now the biggest customer of Zyban. More money for the drug company, more money for the activists and more bullying the smokers into gambling with their lives with this dangerous drug.
Before nicotine became "addicting" the young person who experimented with smoking was very rare yet very few actually became smokers. When the definition of addiction was broadened to include nicotine at the behest of Big Drugs, the message went out that one cigarette equals "addiction". All those addicted youngsters (and adults) immediately became candidates for expensive smoking cessation devices. Each "addicted" smoker bullied into quitting became a dollar sign for Big Drugs. That cessation devices are 85 percent ineffective makes the scam even more brilliant. The guilty smoker swings from cigarettes to patches, or gum, or inhaler, or beverage or candy, then back to cigarettes. In the old days before nicotine was "addicting" people who wanted to quit smoking just quit. Of course no one got rich from that.
On the same day it shills for nicotine patches for children, the BBC writes up anti-tobacco's talking points about secondhand smoke, taxes and health scares and passes it off as health news. The 24 paragraphs offer no proof for any of the allegations and is laced with quotes from various anti-tobacco operatives. The one countering opinion from a tobacco company spokesman warrants only one sentence. People who read this bilge rightly wonder why, if passive smoke is such a "killer", the BBC has never been able to find one real person who was killed by it.
Now this is the sort of research that is useful. Instead of wildly blaming smoking for everything and pushing expensive smoking cessation devices, the researchers examined why a balanced diet appears to ward off the cancers that are supposedly caused by smoking. Although the conclusions are hardly earth-shattering, they do back up the contention that cancer is caused by a multitude of variables of which smoking is only one. It also explains why Greek men, a high percentage of whom are smokers, do not have as high a rate of cancer as do American men whose rate of smoking is much less. The Greeks have a better diet and a far less sedentary lifestyle than do Americans. Studies have shown that rural Greeks who adhere to a very traditional diet have no effects at all from smoking.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||