|
|
|
NOTICE TO OUR READERS
FORCES International wishes to announce a change in posting
schedule. Effective April 3, 2006, we will be updating these pages
twice monthly. The change has been prompted by the need to
reallocate resources for the present, and we regret any
inconvenience to the tens of thousands of readers we have worldwide.
We thank you all for your loyal readership, and hope to be able to
resume a more frequent publishing schedule soon. |
|
|
April 3, 2006 |
|
|
|
April
3 -
Kjono goes
head-to-head with top anti-smoker zealot
- Today, FORCES spokesperson
Norm
Kjono took on anti-tobacco zealot Stanton Glantz on the Voice
of America program Talk to America. It’s a debate that
you shouldn’t miss – and be sure not to miss Glantz’s rapid
back-peddling when Kjono nails him on the facts about the Osteen
court decision on passive smoke!
Kjono argued that the extreme intolerance now being shown toward
smokers – in calls for denying them employment, housing, and
parental rights – can be traced to a mercantile agenda on the part
of anti-smoking entities and certain pharmaceutical companies that
have used the anti-tobacco issue to coerce a massive “brand switch”
from cigarettes to nicotine cessation devices. And he outlined how
federal grant and tax break programs are actually enabling the
process of turning America’s smokers into real pariahs. |
|
ACTION ALERT
April
3 - Hawaii.
SB 3262 would ban smoking in bars and outdoor areas of
restaurants based on ETS. This bill has passed in the Senate and
moving to the House. There are many studies that have dealt
with smoking inside, including OSHA's study which proved the
inside air, where smoking occurred, was cleaner than the outside air. There are no
studies that claim ETS is even traceable in outdoor air. This is
another outrageous campaign to force smokers to quit. Whether
you smoke or not, if we continue to allow false and misleading
science dictate social behavior, it is only a matter of time when
there will be a similar campaign on food and alcohol. Please
contact your
representative today and let
that legislator know how preposterous
prohibition is when it is not based on fact but by special interest
hype and made up hysteria.
|
|
|
For
his part, Glantz demonstrated in first person how tobacco
abolitionists are irresponsibly trying to drum up hysteria about
secondhand smoke in order to stimulate hatred against smokers.
Claiming that secondhand smoke is a source of “very high levels of
toxic chemicals”, Glantz went to speak approvingly of denying
housing to smokers because “these chemicals leak from apartment to
apartment.” To use Glantz’s own words, “This is ridiculous.” |
|
|
Health
April
3 -
"Multifactorial" on stage -
Teasing
out which factors most influence human disease risk is difficult
without conducting large scale studies, said Joellen Schildkraut,
Ph.D., epidemiologist in the department of Community and Family
Medicine at Duke. A prime example is the ongoing debate over the
role of smoking and the NAT2 gene in promoting bladder cancer. Some
studies show that people with a certain version or "allele" of the
NAT2 gene have a 40 percent increased risk for bladder cancer.
Adding tobacco smoke to the effects of this allele may increase
one's risk to 300 percent, said Schildkraut, but the data
sometimes conflict.
We have here a good example of how epidemiology, the method most
used to produce anti-tobacco studies, is generally a lackluster tool
for deriving at "cause and effect". Although a 300 percent
risk increase seems to the layman as well as, unfortunately, to the
majority of health reporters, it isn't really very high. Note
the usage of "may" in the quote above. Such fudge verbs pepper
research papers where conclusions are derived from epidemiology.
The researcher is refreshingly upfront here about the limitations of
his discipline in the first sentence of the above quote. For a
thorough understanding of risk factors and the dearth of evidence
against secondhand smoke, refer to
And They Call This Science on our web site.
Prohibition
April 3 -
A softer, reasonable approach - The small nation of Denmark
has been much in the news of late because of the so-called
controversy erupting over a newspaper's decision to print images of
Mohammed. The country, so far, has bravely faced down an
onslaught of threats and condemnation while newspapers, particularly
here in the United States have cravenly buckled under foreign
pressure.
Lost in all the hubbub is the news
that Denmark is again countering the mob by enacting smoking
regulation that seem downright reasonable these days. Our
correspondent from Denmark fills us in.
Rackets
April 3 -
Racketeering at the top -
The
so-called tobacco settlement is unraveling at the seams. We
present two views from completely different outlooks at the problems
resulting from the 1998 deal that placed the states in Big Tobacco's
bed. Michael Siegel, a tobacco control advocate, reports that
payments from the industry will likely be reduced if the states do
not jump to Big Tobacco's tune. While we disagree with Dr.
Siegel's view that the settlement could have been crafted with a
focus more attuned to the needs of health issues, we agree with him
that the settlement was flawed from the beginning.
April 3 -
Tobacco states -
The
so-called tobacco settlement between Big Tobacco and the states has
been called many things. Over the years the appellations of
this deal have devolved from laudatory to accusatory as its flaws
have become glaring. In this short article about where the
settlement stands today the author refers to the settlement as worse
than a protection racket. A government-sponsored cartel is a
more accurate description.
The victims of this racket include
small independent cigarette manufacturers who were not the targets
of the Medicaid lawsuits the resulted in the tobacco settlement.
These blameless companies, at the behest of Big Tobacco, have been
penalized by the states in a scheme that is being challenged in the
courts. Smokers, of course, are the primary victims, financing
the whole rotten deal through artificially high cigarette prices.
The partnership between Big Tobacco and the states answers the
question of what happens when corrupt and predatory entities join
forces to "solve" a problem.
Straighten up Eaters
April 3 -
Busybodies or Tyrants? -
Walter
Williams doesn't have much use for the laughably named Center for
Science in the Public Interest, a Washington DC outfit that
campaigns endlessly to convert Americans into a nation of
tofu-swilling hypochondriacs. Unlike many who disagree with
CSPI's goals yet attribute good motives to the organization,
Williams sees them as a malignant pressure group that is steadily
eroding our rights, much as anti-tobacco is doing. The
brazenness of some elements in tobacco control provides the proof
that "reasonably" compromising with unreasonable people is a recipe
for disaster.
HateApril 3 -
Another one bites the dust -
Chalk
up another success for the tobacco control movement. One less
smoker pollutes the earth thanks to the smoking ban in Scotland.
A Dundee pensioner of 85 years of age, cracked his skull when
he fell leaving his pub to smoke a cigar outdoors. The son of
the victim to anti-tobacco's lies and intolerance is angry and
rightly places the blame on the smoking ban. Unfortunately the
ire over old people being treated with disrespect has not yet
resulted in a demand to end the ban immediately.
|
|
Smokers
April
3 -
FORCES Moments 2005 - A bit late but not forgotten we are
happy to present the winners of our photo contest. Smokers
throughout the world sent us pictures of themselves, happily smoking
and enjoying themselves. It was hard to pick the winners but
we feel those we have designated are representative of the diversity
and breadth of people who are happy in their own skins and who
dismiss the anti-smoking tirades as so much ugly noise.
At the Movies
April
3 -
Thank you for smoking
-
Twelve
years ago when extreme anti-smoking activism was just a gleam in the
eyes of a few loud, self-promoting ideologues Christopher Buckley's
satiric novel about the vilification of the tobacco industry made a
surprisingly large splash on the literary scene. As the
anti-tobacco movement reaches its peak a movie based on the book is
opening in the nation's cinemas.
Brooke Oberwetter's review in Reason
Magazine examines the movie and pronounces it a refreshing take from
a Hollywood that is far too often hobbled by its innate politically
correct dogma. While the reviewer wishes the timeframe of the
movie had taken place in the present rather than in the relatively
innocent early 1990's the libertarian reviewer appreciates the
message of personal responsibility and individual choice that has
been all but obliterated by the therapeutic society that is
eliminating the core values of the republic. Check it out.
Population ControlApril 3 -
Anti-smoking Taliban -
Anti-tobacco
operatives protest bitterly whenever they are compared to
unwholesome political movements or regimes. To be fair there
is a tendency in today's hyperventilating society to call opponents
names rather than rationally discuss differences of opinion.
Certainly anti-tobacco is very guilty of this sloppiness although
its name-calling generally is limited to labeling its opponents as
tools of Big Tobacco.
Betsy Hart
is a nationally syndicated columnist who, after careful reflection,
sees disturbing parallels between anti-tobacco and the infamous
Taliban regime that nearly ruined Afghanistan. The equivalence
between the two ideologies is based more upon how each demonize
opponents in starkly religious terms. While some my consider
anti-tobacco's goals and tactics up-to-date and modern, Hart sees
lurking underneath a zealotry and orthodoxy that has nothing to do
with facts but plenty to do with sin, as practiced by unpopular
groups. Region it is, although like Satanism, anti-tobacco's
strain of faith reflects the dominant culture of "anything goes"
except for a few, trivial activities, like smoking, that function as
the elitists' scapegoats. April 3 -
Is
Diabetis a Plague? - [New York City Health Commissioner]
Friedan envisions regulations for chronic disease control
including "local requirements on food pricing, advertising, content,
and labeling; regulations to facilitate physical activity, including
point-of-service reminders at elevators and safe, accessible
stairwells; tobacco and alcohol taxation and advertising and sales
restrictions; and regulations to ensure a minimal level of clinical
preventive services."
A dark and scary preview of the
future is occurring right now in New York City where a powerful
public health bureaucracy is inexorably replacing choice and
personal responsibility with the dictates of governing class that
has never been elected and whose platform is imposed by fiat.
The growth of Public Health has been gradual but has now reached a
tipping point where it is emboldened to propose policies that would
have resulted in termination had public health workers proposed them
only a few years ago.
PoliticsApril 3 -
Derailing the gravy train -
It's
not often that a politician these days displays courage so it is a
pleasant shock that Mississippi's governor is facing down one of the
most vicious special interests groups operating in the country.
Haley Barbour last week vetoed a bill that would have continued the
multi-million payment to a private nonprofit, anti-tobacco
organization.
Set up in 1998 The Partnership for a
Healthy Mississippi is a result of a deal between that state's
attorney general and Big Tobacco that halted the state's suit
against the industry. The attorney general, Mike Moore, after
a failed political bid, then maneuvered himself into running the
Partnership. In the past five years alone the Partnership has
received $100-million. Governor Barbour accurately describes
the Partnership as cloaked in politics and cronyism.
Looking out for his constituents does
come with a cost as Barbour is finding out. A flack for the
Partnership calls the governor....a tool for Big Tobacco. How
novel and how typical. The governor of this sometimes despised
state shows his peers how to stiffen their spines in the face of the
inordinate greed of anti-tobacco special interests. | |
|
|
Framing the Issue
April 3 - Where are we headed?
- The level of control exerted upon the supposedly free citizens
of Western Europe and North America is reaching a critical point.
People today submit to a level of control that our grandparents
would have found unbearable yet we, the product of their sacrifices
to maintain liberty, grumble and grouse but ultimately shrug off the
responsibility of taking positive action.
While we have focused primarily on
the anti-smoking movement we are aware that that agenda is only one
of the manifestations of the control that is tightening like a vise.
Anti-tobacco, of course, has gone the farthest and has paved the way
for all the other efforts to remove freedom in the name of safety
and health.
Michael Siegel, a tobacco control
advocate, could be considered a cog in the machine that is
flattening variety and eliminating choice. He, however, for
quite some time has been looking critically at the movement in which
he has worked for so long. He has, in his own words, been
challenging the dogma of anti-tobacco.
Gian Turci addresses the dogma that
Dr. Siegel challenges but wonders whether the dogma is being
challenged at all. He looks at the core assertions of the
tobacco control movement and finds they do not measure up to any
standard of scientific reality.
Challenging Dogma?
The Real Dogma Is Not Challenged At All
Olivia Anne Mac Diarmid places the anti-smoking movement in
perspective by noting that while smoking is a trivial issue to most
people, including smokers who are the victims of anti-smoking
policies, its place in the overall agenda to protect people from
themselves is crucial as a marker to just how much the controllers
can get away with. Ms. Mac Diarmid responds to Michael
Siegel's horror over policies such as that enacted in Calabasas
California which take punitive measures against smokers to a new
height. She finds disturbing that "health" is being used to
whip up hatred against "the other" while simultaneously layering its
agenda with an aura of religiosity.
Tobacco Control: The Canary In The Coalmine
|
|
Fight
for FreedomApril 3 -
It's with sadness and a great sense of loss that FORCES
International reports the death of Chris Tame, a member of the
FORCES
Honour Committee, a founder of the
Libertarian
Alliance, in Great Britain and a former director of
Freedom
Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco (FOREST).
A deep thinker and prolific writer, Tame
distinguished himself with a long series of essays such as The Jewish Journal of Sociology,
Politics, Science and Public Policy, The Journal of
Social, Political and Economic Studies, Werifrei and Economic
Affairs. With his kind and generous personality, always willing
to encourage young libertarians, Dr. Tame was an inspiration to a
generation of British libertarians. Born in 1949, Dr. Tame died
peacefully March 20 after a long struggle with cancer. He was a
nonsmoker who for over 30 years strove to alert society to the grave
danger of the cancer of anti-tobacco
Chris Tame will be always in our hearts
and in our minds and his name will continue as an inspiration to our
fight against the fraud of anti-tobacco and our never ending pursuit of
liberty. |
|
|
Straightening up Drinkers
April 3 -
Prohibitionists strike back -
Over
the past several years alcohol interests, especially the vintners,
have touted studies that show a health benefit when alcohol is
"moderately" consumed. The methods to produce these studies
are the same used to produce anti-smoking studies which is not to
say that moderate alcohol use doesn't lead to improved health.
Epidemiology isn't science and when utilized to prove a point
promoted by special interests it can be manipulated to "prove"
anything.
From the University of California -
San Francisco, the font of much of the anti-smoking junk science,
comes a review of the research that promotes moderate alcohol study.
Not surprisingly the "researchers" conclude that the pro-alcohol
research is flawed. What now follows is an argument between
the pro-alcohol crowd and anti-alcohol, each thrusting volumes of
data into the face of the other. The winner will not be
determined by which position is true, since epidemiology cannot
determine that. Instead the winner will be the faction with
the most political juice. At this time, bet on the
prohibitionists.
Ethics
April 3 -
Futility of the smear -
This
week a representative of FORCES debated a representative from the
American Nonsmokers' Rights about smoking bans imposed upon the
great outdoors. At one point the ANR threw a spit ball at
FORCES by implying the organization is tied to Big Tobacco because
FORCES once hired a lawyer to prepare an application to the Internal
Revenue for tax exempt status. The attorney had done legal
work for a cigarette manufacturer.
This secondhand smear is typical of
ANR, a group that once compiled an enemy list consisting of everyone
and every group that disagreed with its smoke-free agenda. To
the ANR anyone deviating from anti-tobacco orthodoxy is a front for
Big Tobacco. Michael Siegel, himself an advocate for tobacco
control, deplores ANR's smear tactics.
April 3 -
Lying, once again -
Michael
Siegel notes yet another example of an anti-smoking organization
willfully dispersing fallacious information. In this case the
Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights claims that one half hour of
exposure to secondhand smoke damages the hearts of nonsmokers just
as much as a lifetime of smoking.
This tobacco control advocate is
rightfully concerned that in today's environment of wild,
unjustified misinformation legitimate tobacco control goals will be
invalidated as the press and public becomes aware that some
anti-smoking organizations are not telling the truth. When
part of the message is shown to be a lie, why believe any of the
message? |
|
Commentary
April 3 -
Big brother or sister? - Last week Texas' finest were
summoned to patrol the bars looking for intoxicated patrons.
The unlucky tipplers were arrested in a preemptive move to prevent
them from driving under the influence. Bob Dyer takes a dim
view of assigning guilt before acting illegally.
Politics
April 3 -
Reiner resigns under a cloud -
As
the scandal over misspent funds escalates Rob Reiner, the chairman
of the state commission he created eight years ago, resigned,
protesting his innocence all the way. His resignation doesn't
mean he is out of the woods yet. Legislators from both parties
are calling for audits and a thorough investigation into the
multi-million dollar television commercials touting pre-school
programs that have become Reiner's latest cause. The scandal
casts doubts on Reiner's voter initiative to raise taxes to
pre-schoolr all of California's children.
Anti-smoking Backfire
April
3 -
Smoking rates rise after ban - Prior to the imposition of
the nationwide smoking ban in Ireland the newspapers couldn't get
enough of the propaganda passed out by anti-tobacco operatives.
Paragraph after paragraph in story after story foretold a booming
pub scene after all the nasty smokers had been eliminated.
Smoking rates would dive as smokers gave up their habit to fit in
with the new, healthy, happy and smoke-free Irish lifestyle.
Two years later terse stories report
the results of the smoking ban. Hundreds of pubs have gone out
of business while the smoking rate has risen. Looks like the
Irish experiment was a failure on all levels. Very bad news
and one that the media is embarrassed to report.
Junk Science
April 3 -
Global warming cools -
Despite
the claims of the true believers, the question of whether human
activity causes global warming is far from settled. The
scientific consensus invoked by the global warming crowd is as
fictitious as is the "proof" they cite to justify curbs upon energy
use.
While most who disagree with the
theory that mankind is responsible for warmer temperatures back up
their position with arcane formulas and masses of data, Alan Caruba
takes the common sense approach. This short and delightfully
non-technical article packs a punch that cannot be attained by
scientists who entangle themselves in minutia that the layman will
not understand. | |
|
|
FORCES INTERNATIONAL (Forces, Inc.) is a
non-profit educational corporation organized under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, USA. Forces, Inc. has received a
charitable tax exemption under Internal Revenue Code 501(c)3.
Your contribution is tax deductible.
FORCES INTERNATIONAL ©
trademark, logo and original material copyright © 1995-2004 is
property of FORCES INTERNATIONAL unless otherwise indicated.
Original FORCES material may be reprinted or used in any
non-commercial form if proper credit is given to FORCES and original
intent remains intact. All other material remains property of its
creator/owner. | |
|