|
|
|
November 26, 2004 |
|
Big
Tobacco
November 26 -
Marlboro
Country - We've
taken our shots at Philip Morris but few can deny the tobacco
giant's Marlboro cigarette campaign defines marketing genius.
Launched over 40 years ago to expand the customer base from
primarily women to a more universal demographic, the Marlboro
campaign increased sales of the cigarette by 5,000 percent in eight
months. The Marlboro brand is now the most popular on the face
of the earth. The Marlboro Man is a modern icon and the
expansive, red rock American southwest landscape is known as
Marlboro Country, as familiar to world as is the Golden Gate Bridge
and the Empire State Building. To people crowded in congested
urban areas the vast, empty space and cloudless blue sky of Marlboro
Country (click on the picture above) inspires a desire to get away
from it all, light up a cigarette and just be.
These days, of course, Philip Morris sleeps
with its "enemies", cuts deals with gangsters and screws
its friends, the consumers. The bold Marlboro advertising
campaign is a shadow of its former self. As its biggest money
maker, however, Philip Morris still promotes the cigarette to the
best of its ability, mostly outside the United States. One of
the components is flying young people to Utah, the location of the
Marlboro Man commercials, for a two week outdoor adventure and photo
ops that will later be used in ads outside the country. Over
one million people applied for the experience, which is closed to
Americans for various legal reasons. In the past American
journalists did cover the event but as the reporters became more
bossy, moralistic and doctrinaire PM banned them this year:
"..team members, according to company
executive François Moreillon, asked that Americans not intrude on
their trip. Philip Morris agreed. "We want the winners to
experience the freedom of America," explains Moreillon.
"And we find this is easiest when Americans are not part of the
event."
An intrepid reporter from the rabidly anti-smoking Los Angeles
Times smelled a scandalous story and attempted to crash the party to
titillate the sophisticated readers back home -- Hollywood! -- with
tales of promiscuous smoking and wanton leather wearing. That
the participants are all attractive young people from Asia and
Europe adds to the illicit eroticism. Rebuffed nearly every
step of the way by muscular local cowhands and disputatious PM
flacks he doesn't make much headway with the hot babes but does get
to sermonize about the hypocrisy of Morman Utah hosting the tobacco
debauchery for big bucks, the Bureau of Land Management for
cooperating in the sullying of public land and Philip Morris for
continuing the dastardly business of making money for the
corporation. Reduced to shouting questions at the nubile
foreigners from afar he unashamedly asks questions that would give
even Cotton Mather pause:
Who are these people? Who actually smokes like this anymore?
What do their mothers think?
Okay, it's a slow news week, what with the elections over and the
Thanksgiving holiday coming up. Still, the Los Angeles Times
is one of America's major papers, presumably with better fish to fry
than ambushing a field trip of a bunch of young people on their
first trip to the great American southwest. One hopes the
young folk had a good time, enjoyed viewing the sights from
horseback and the socializing that occurs when young people of
different cultures are thrown together. Too bad they had to
endure a callow gadfly buzzing about their heads chattering
obsessively about the trivial matter of smoking.
|
|
|
November 25, 2004 |
|
|
Politics November
25 - Thanksgiving
Horror - Call for James Repace! John Banzhaf! Philip Morris too! Now that you've got families exiling smoking relatives into the backyard snow banks on holiday visits, look, just look, what Grandma's doing in the kitchen! Cooking turkey in ... a charcoal SMOKER! The old lady is burning coal and wood chips indoors, with all the little grandtykes, within nose-shot! Mister Repace, tear down the kitchen walls, and Philip Morris, please tell us there's no such thing as safe meal preparation, before Attorney Banzhaf accuses you of instigating this tragedy. Sure, Granny belongs in the hoosegow, but you bet we know who's really behind this: insidious, brainwashing, baby-killing Big Tobacco! We trust that all FORCES readers, now suitably warned, will enjoy a semi-delightful (if possibly frost-bitten and turkey-free) Thanksgiving day. As ever, make the most of your holiday, with all our warm and best wishes.
Canada
November
25 - Canada
Tobacco News - One Quebec city, looking at the devastation
caused by smoking bans, has withdrawn its plan to ban smoking in
restaurants.
Free money! For anti-smoking
activists! So happy the financial health of Canada is secure.
The Indian tribes are lining up to
claim an exemption from the upcoming Ontario province smoking
ban. The opposition
party in Manitoba is proposing that the government compensate rural
businesses negatively impacted by the smoking ban. The
British Columbia the government is setting up a web site (how
novel!) to help smokers quit.
|
|
Straightening
up eaters
November
11 -
Larding
The Figures - Not long ago the head of the Centers for Disease Control and the
Secretary of Health and Human Services ascended their soapboxes to
hector America about their flabby bodies. Fat Americans, they
shrieked, are dropping dead by the hundreds of thousands. The
death toll is nearly as high as that caused by smoking.
Drastic measures must be adopted immediately to deal with a health
crisis of spectacular gravity.
This alarming news was fodder for
several weeks of wailing, gnashing of teeth and soul searching as
every special interest group remotely connected to obesity weighed
in with demands for government to make the citizens shape up.
The hook to tobacco hysteria was brilliant, although very
discomforting to the suddenly out-of-fashion activists.
Smoking no longer the most important health issue? Perish the
thought!
Early this week the CDC quietly
admitted it had made an error in its tabulation of the fat death
toll. Although it refused to issue the number it had
overestimated, one paper reported that the CDC overstated the figure
by 80,000. Whoops! Back to the statistical drawing
board!
Although ignored by most of the
media, the most interesting aspect of the CDC's original death toll
is that its 400,000 deaths per year is identical to what was, until
recently, the death toll from smoking. For years the CDC was
saying that tobacco killed 400,000 Americans per year. About
three years ago the anti-tobacco industry began pushing that figure
higher. In this story the CDC now says that smoking kills
435,000. Rather strange that the tobacco death toll is
increasing while the CDC claims that smoking rates have dramatically
declined in the past decade. Something isn't right with this
picture. The tobacco death toll has been debunked
and now its fat deaths appear to be a lie.
The CDC is revealed as a
politically-driven agency that pulls numbers out of hats to advance
the causes of the special interests who make money of regulating
personal behavior.
|
|
|
|
November 24, 2004 |
|
|
Politics November
24 - Anti-tobacco.
The Kiss Of Death - On the surface it should have been a
slam-dunk win for Christine Gregoire. As the attorney general
of Washington, Gregoire certainly had the name recognition in the
contest for governor. She is a Democrat while her opponent is
a Republican in a state that has not elected a Republican as
governor for over 20 years. Although attorneys general don't
often bring home the bacon for the citizens, Gregoire, so she
harped, had brought home a suckling pig in the form of the
multi-billion tobacco settlement. Washington is a
"blue" state that voted big time for the Democrat
presidential contender. Gregoire should have won with a very
comfortable margin. So why is
Gregoire not governor? Norman Kjono examines the election data and
posits a plausible theory for Gregoire's dismal showing on November
2. Further, it appears that what did her in is also responsible for a
net Democratic loss of three statewide offices, including attorney
general. We note that as of the
date of this publication a recount is underway in Washington to
determine this closely fought race.
Whoops,
So SorryNovember
24 -
Positive
Development - The Environmental Protection Agency is a reliable whipping boy
for those disgusted by junk science produced to further an
agenda. Generally the EPA deserves the scorn it gets but when
it admits, sort of, to a mistake, credit must be given. This
week the agency announced that seven chemicals it had previously
labeled "toxic, smog-forming or hazardous" have been
exonerated after extensive scientific review. Instead of
discouraging their use, the EPA is now recommending that the seven
chemicals be used. The EPA has
been for a long time one of the most politicized of federal
agencies. It falsely and deliberately labeled secondhand smoke
a carcinogen to further the goal of eliminating smoking. It
stands by its conclusion despite the mountain of evidence that its
findings are false. Perhaps admitting that it made mistakes
will become habit forming and the EPA will correct its
"mistake" about secondhand smoke.
|
|
Hysteria
November 24 -
Imagining
Health Disasters - Todd Seavey, writing for the American Council on Science and
Health, writes of how technology's ability to measure ever smaller
particles, although a boon to science, provides the perfect excuse
for the purveyors of health hysteria to whip up the populace into a
panic.
Forgotten, or purposefully ignored, by the fright
mongers is the truism that it is the dose that makes the
poison. He takes the media to task for consistently hyping the
lurid while scanting the deliberative. A specific example includes
an "activist" calling the Mediterranean Sea an un-flushed
toilet to the delight of the media while a scientist throwing cold
water on the unwarranted hysteria is ignored. The tactics that
demonized tobacco have been perfected and we now have an epidemic of
purposeful deception.
November 24 -
Hazardous
Worship Services - Speaking of tiny solid pollutants, we present this hilarious BBC
story about the dangers lurking in churches, especially during the
Christmas season.
Church air was found to be
considerably higher in carcinogenic polycyclic hydrocarbons than air
beside roads travelled by 45,000 vehicles daily.
Such is the credulousness of the BBC
that a midnight Christmas service may as well be held by the side of
a busy highway for all these dumb priests know about health.
The candles and incense must go so that worship may be sanitized for
the 21st century. Improved ventilation won't do since
anti-tobacco says that it would take a hurricane to purify the air
of the church pollutants, which are the same as those of
tobacco. Merry Christmas from Big Health.
November 24 -
Incensed
By Incense - As an antidote for the mind-numbing earnestness of the BBC, the
news outfit that never met a junk science study it couldn't embrace,
Judi McLeod takes the Church of Pollution report and puts it into
perspective. An activist here an activist there and pretty
soon we won't dare climb out of bed in the morning so deadly is our
world.
|
|
Prohibition
November
24 -
Why
Bars Are Not "Smokefree" - One can sometimes be tempted to use common language. It frankly becomes tiresome repeatedly debunking ludicrous statistical tricks and other patent nonsense that tobacco prohibitionists spout so nauseously and incessantly.
What has become of common sense? Remember, just for instance, that the Guinness book's oldest human, Jeanne Calment who lived to 122, was a daily cigarette smoker throughout her adult life. Yet anti-smoking goes on spreading panic, most egregiously, about "secondhand smoke."
It makes you angry. "The peril of passive smoking" trumps the old prohibitionist hysteria about "the fatal glass of beer" hands down. Indeed, smoking itself compares to weight as a health factor, like being either very fit or very fat, depending as whether one smokes sparingly or spatially.
What's obvious is obvious. One would expect to find a relatively higher proportion of smokers amongst fun-loving denizens of the night-life, just as one would expect to find a comparatively higher proportion of non-smokers (and non-drinkers) amongst regular church-goers, than might be typical of the population at large. Bar and restaurant smoking prohibitions deny customers basic and expected accommodation.
In relaxed bars and pubs particularly, smoking is characteristically widespread, amongst even those who generally abstain from tobacco. Prissy types and health hysterics are a distinct minority in "fun" spots. In fact one should think that most such sober-minded persons would tend to avoid all bars except under pressing conditions of social obligation, just as many fun-lovers stay out of church, but for weddings and funerals.
This is why voluntarily smoke-free bars are rare indeed even despite decades of panicked passive smoking propaganda. So the story is the same wherever fanatical government-mandated smoking bans appear. Lots of places try to cheat and lots of others go belly-up.
Journalist Eddie Barnes asked Irish pub manager Margaret Brogan about prohibitionists' claims to the contrary: "What about the claims that the ban has actually boosted business — that it has brought out non-smokers to the pubs for the first time? 'Crap,' says Brogan, candidly." And so say all of us.
|
|
|
November 23, 2004 |
|
|
Censorship
November
23 -
People
In Glass Houses... - New York Times columnist Frank Rich fears a "new politically correct American culture." He bemoans the influence of puritanical pressure groups and governmental regulation. Television stations were afraid to show a realistic war movie this past Veterans' Day for fear of retribution from these forces. In fact the film "Saving Private Ryan" was deliberately unrealistic in a very specific way, discussed below, but Rich would be carelessly ignorant of that. What the columnist has discovered is "McCarthyism, 'moral values' style," and he is mortified at the revelation. Could such puritanism, Rich asks, also result in self-censorship of actual news reporting?
Regarding tobacco such politically correct self-censorship has long been the rule. Note, for instance, our comments of 29 October 2003 regarding
Forbidden Images in mainstream media outlets such as the New York Times. Note also that 75% of American WW II soldiers smoked, and that Tom Hanks envisioned his heroic lead character in the 1998 "Saving Private Ryan," as a cigarette smoker. The actor was prevailed upon by producers to substitute for smoking a nervous habit of running his fingers over his thumb. All the grue of war, and soldierly expletives, were cinematically acceptable six years ago, but the political incorrectness of tobacco was already being censored.
The fears of a New York Times columnist may be "new" but a "politically correct American culture" is not, and a large parcel of the fault for this, lies in the columnist's offices. Frank Rich grudgingly admits that the now-famous image of American marine James Miller, the "Marlboro Man" of Falluja, "is, as Mr. Rumsfeld might say, a slice of truth." Yet Rich insists that newspapers must report the whole truth. We agree, and suggest particularly that the patent falsity and vilifying propaganda of fanatical anti-smoking, and widely pervasive media complicity in this, finally be acknowledged and reported in the New York Times. At the same time, we suspect Times columnists and editors may always consider that some truths are "fit to print," while others are not. There's nothing new about that.
|
|
Population
Control
November 23 -
Lumps
Of Coal - Big Brother dumped a ton of coal on smokers in South Africa,
bringing wreaths of smiles to anti-smokers everywhere. The
Health and Other Service Personnel Trade Union of South Africa
informed its workers that the Christmas holiday would be a
two-tiered affair this year with nonsmokers receiving an additional
five days off. Smokers have been told that because of their
sinful ways they must work additional days "to set an example
to our members with relation to our general well-being."
How penalizing workers who lawfully consume a legal product fits
within the Christmas holiday season is not addressed by little
dictator who issued the edict.
Deception
November
23 - The
Ends Justify The Means - Privately,
some scientists and anti-smoking lobbyists concede that the evidence
for the lethal effects of passive smoking is less than compelling.
Yet they insist that qualms over the scientific evidence should not
get in the way of the ultimate goal: the elimination of an avoidable
cause of more than 100,000 deaths in the UK each year.
Robert Matthews, writing for the
Telegraph, strolls through the evidence manufactured by
agenda-driven "researchers" to make the case for smoking
bans. He explains how and why these studies were molded and
shaped to produce the "right" result.
He also highlights research, such as
a huge, long term study conducted at the University of California
that counters anti-tobacco's secondhand smoke claims. When the
researchers conclusions don't please the social engineers there is
hell to pay as the Telegraph itself found out when anti-tobacco
tried to censor the newspaper when it broke the story about a World
Health Organization secondhand smoke study that also ran counter to
anti-tobacco dogma. He finishes by noting that the obsessive
focus on secondhand smoke is harmful to legitimate research on all
aspects of health.
|
|
|
|
November 22, 2004 |
|
|
Prohibition
November
22 - Denmark Next? - The small kingdom of Denmark, Europe, is on the anti tobacco scare
list. As yet it is possible to go to most restaurants and bars for a
meal, a drink and a smoke. In most work places you can grab a smoke too.
But the vultures of anti-tobacco smell smoked human meat.
Pipe smoking Minister of Health, Lars Loekke Rasmussen, of the
Liberal Party, has not been able to stem the tides. Anti-tobacco
advocates in the National Board of Health, fed by the Danish Cancer
Society, are in the process of inducing a smoke scare among the unsuspecting
public. The claims of anti tobacco are even more hilarious
than those claimed by the American Cancer Society. Health fascists in
Denmark claim that ETS raises risk of coronary heart disease by 60 %!.
That is the same as they claim for active smoking! Given the high rate
of smoking, it's a wonder anyone in Denmark besides smokers are actually
alive.
The first signs of the European Union promoted scare, labeled ”Feel Free To Say
No” are emerging. Good slogan, why not reject the scare with a
resounding ”NO”.
As you read these words, work is in progress to open a Forces chapter
in the worlds oldest kingdom. If anti-tobacco has things its way, it
could speed up matters!
Søren Højbjerg
Junk
Science
November 22 -
Smoggy
Statistics - Last week the press releases were flying fast and furious
from researcher to press mavens. The alarming nature of
the message guaranteed that most dailies and television news
outfits would carry the release disguised as news. The
resulting headlines were satisfactorily alarming and exploited the well-massaged fears of
a populace geared to freak out over air
pollution and health.
Basically the researchers had discovered
that "increased air pollution from cars, power plants and
industry can be directly linked to higher death rates in U.S.
cities." Enough said, seems to be the tactic taken by
the reporters who didn't delve beneath the researchers' write up
of their study. Reporters, even those described as science
reporters, always accept at face value the studies and research
that aligns with their perceptions of reality. The
American public as been short changed for years on health
information.
Fortunately for those who know damn well
that hysteria is the current coin of the realm, Steve Milloy of junkscience.com
read the actual study and points out the difference between
politically-motivated "research", reality and public
policy.
|
|
Psychosis
November 22 - Sleeping
With The Lights On - On occasion we have referred to the
anti-tobacco mentality as a mental disorder. Although it is
faith-based its acolytes are compelled to impose it upon their
neighbors. Unlike religious mania, however, anti-tobacco
adherents dress up their belief with the trappings of science --
pseudo-science actually since on close examination the
"science" dissolves into intangible vapors.
We present here a short explanation
of what anti-tobacco has accomplished up to now preaching its mantra
of contradictions, why such a bizarre ethos will fail and a glimpse
into the minds of the unhappy people who have devoted their lives to
a false god.
Canada
November
22 - Canada
Tobacco News - The New Brunswick smoking ban is producing
the usual result; lost revenue for businesses that will soon be out
of business.
The boneheads responsible for high
taxes know why smuggling is increasing. In fact they expected
it. They continue in their insanity.
Anti-tobacco continues its
destructive drive to make the Canadian pension system divest tobacco
stocks. Not a good idea as these stocks are consistently good
performers.
Restaurant and bar owners as well as
casino operators in the United States across the Ontario border as
popping the champagne corks as that province moves towards total
prohibition.
Tobacco
Taxes
November
17 -
Finger
In The Dike - A busy
group of federal and New York agents confiscated cigarettes sent
into the country from Switzerland. Although the specific
grounds from interrupting the shipments are not available in this
story, it is clear that tax collectors in New York have ramped up
their attempt to halt the ocean of cheap cigarettes flowing into the
state due to the obscenely high state taxes. New York City
also tacks on a huge local tax so practically no one buys cigarettes
in that city these days.
The tax collectors may have halted
this one particular vendor from availing itself of the huge market
for reasonably priced cigarettes but stopping this one spigot means
that one or more spigots will spring into existence. People
will not pay high prices for goods that are produced for a low
price. This economic rule cannot be violated. If New
York wishes to halt the "illegal" sales it can easily
reduce its tax take to something appropriate.
|
|
|
|
November 19, 2004 |
|
|
Prohibition
November
19 -
Hair
Trigger - A week ago some jokers on a Lexington Kentucky radio station flummoxed
their listeners with an announcement that the county council had banned
smoking in cars. City Hall was flooded with calls from angry citizens
complaining about this latest meddling by the anti-smoking
politicians. The volume of calls interrupted city business and
overwhelmed the police department.
Although the radio story proved to be
a hoax it is understandable that the residents believed the false
report considering the anti-smoking fanaticism rampant in city
hall. Two years ago the council imposed a California type
smoking ban and the residents have been restless and discontented
ever since.
Although the politicians initially
vowed to complain to the FCC about the radio hoax they finally
decided to accept a formal apology from the station owners.
City Hall certainly won't be proposing any additional anti-smoker
measures any time soon and the hints that the unpopular smoking ban
might be altered may be followed up with action.

Nazi
War On Tobacco
November 19 -
We
Have Ways Of Making You Stop - We don't call the anti-smokers Nazis for nothing. Adolf Hitler's anti-smoking policies were the prototype for what we're seeing today. This article by Michael Fitzpatrick reviews some of the parallels, and while smoking risks are often typically overstated here, it's always valuable to remind ourselves of the close kinship between today's anti-smoking technocrats and the fascists of the Third Reich. A small factual error in the article misidentifies a Nazi researcher as Franz Lickint (his first name was Fritz.) A greater error reports on the subject of "secondhand smoke" that, "Swedish toxicologist Robert Nilsson, while accepting the plausibility of the lung cancer link and the fact that numerous studies appear to show a statistically significant increase in risk, has questioned its epidemiological significance."
The simple fact is that passive smoking studies have overwhelmingly produced statistically insignificant results. As technically defined, statistically insignificant results are categorically exonerative, thus in producing such results, studies definitively render moot the perceived plausibility of linkage to disease, which initiated them. No study has ever given a practically significant indication of either good or ill from secondhand smoke. As a veteran critic of passive smoking studies Robert Nilsson is well aware of this.
Professor Nilsson has consistently decried bogus interpretations of "risk" and unprofessional bias amongst researchers, complaining that, "Because all tobacco smoke is seen as a major health risk, some scientists and physicians seem to have shelved their efforts to analyze the possible effects of passive smoking rigorously." Beyond this, Nilsson has famously revealed outright and deliberate misrepresentation of data by researchers, as in his response to the British Medical Journal's 1997 publication of the Wald study (of the always dubious "meta-analysis" type) which managed by prevarication to trump up a tiny 1.26 relative risk of lung cancer resulting from secondhand smoke exposure. Professor Nilsson specifically and scathingly debunked the study as a "statistical trick" of such transparent falsity that he suggested the BMJ editorial board must be "innocent of epidemiology" to have published it.
Nilsson explains in this article that, if one is to believe epidemiological consensus, eating Japanese sea food could produce 12 cases of cancer, eating mushrooms could produce 3 cases, and secondhand smoke could produce 2, while sunshine could produce 23, and "unknown" factors (the number one "cause" of cancer) could result in 177, all out of a population of 100,000 people. How plausible is that? Perhaps we should ban the eating of mushrooms in restaurants, but maybe permit this only in stand-alone bars, provided of course that the mushrooms are sold uncooked as "snacks." Or must we in fact close down all the restaurants and bars, while also banning every workplace, outdoors and wherever the sun can shine in? The always intrepid James Repace could tell us that curtains are no protection whatsoever and he could start a whole new movement to extinguish the hellish sun once and for all. Crazy liars, vicious vilifying propagandists, hateful technocratic tyrants. We don't call them Nazis for nothing.
|
|
Anti-tobacco
Politicians November 19 - Good
News From Washington! - Another anti-tobacco attorney
general appears headed for political oblivion. Back in those
heady days in 1998 when big tobacco lay prone at the feet of the
triumphant state attorneys general the future appeared bright indeed
for those who had extracted billions of dollars from
smokers. That was then.
Christine Gregoire, who trampled bystanders in her rush to hog the
cameras, based her run for governor of Washington on her involvement
in the settlement. The voters have spoken and they haven't
been appreciative.
Pro
Choice Smokers Newsletter
November
19 -
Latest Edition Out Now - The Tobacco Manufacturers have concluded
that the claims against secondhand smoke haven't been proven. We all
know that. What's surprising is that the generally supine industry is
finally speaking up.
Details and much much more inside.
Injustice
November
19 -
Crushing
The Producers - One of the biggest disappointments of the Bush Administration is
how it was bullied into continuing the federal lawsuit, launched by
the Clinton Administration, against the tobacco industry. As
the trial moves forward the hypocrisy and greed on which this suit
is based becomes clearer. We
are now in the ninth week of the farce and the judge has halted the
proceedings so that the industry can make an interim appeal over
whether, should the government prevail, the companies must
"disgorge" the profits they made over the past 33
years. Disgorgement is a punishment for criminal cases under
the RICO statutes that form the basis of the suit. Since the
tobacco suit is a civil complaint it is uncertain whether
disgorgement applies. The
stakes are huge. If the industry must disgorge its profits the
government would collect $280-billion. If disgorgement is not
allowed in civil cases then the government would collect nothing but
the satisfaction of ordering the industry to alter its marketing
strategies. Considering
that government, at both the state and local levels, has collected
more money per cigarette pack sold than the cigarette manufacturers
over the past 33 years it would seem that the RICO racketeering
statutes should include the government as a co-conspirator with the
industry. The tobacco control industry has also profited
handsomely from cigarette sales. Bring these racketeers before
the judge as well. All the
legal maneuverings, of course, are merely a smokescreen to obscure
the foregone conclusion of this case. The government doesn't
have a case but it has all the power. The industry will, as it
always does, make a deal with its persecutors. It will settle
for a huge sum, up the price of its product, thereby obligating the
smokers to pay yet more of their money to the government. When
the government assumes the role of a robber it shouldn't be dismayed
when the citizens withdraw their trust.
Population
Control
November 19 -
Binding
Us With Rules - It is said, though less often now than it used to
be, that the basis of English liberty is the rule of law, under
which everything is allowed unless specifically prohibited.
Effectively, this principle limited the scope of the state to
intervene in people's lives. Law set the boundaries of personal
action but did not dictate the course of such action.
The author of this provocative lament
notes that this simple concept worked very well for hundreds of
years but over time, first slowly then rapidly, has found disfavor
with the governing class. In both the United States and in the
United Kingdom the law makers are hell bent on writing laws that
govern every aspect of human behavior. The law code books
expand while personal liberty contracts.
|
|
|
|
FORCES
INTERNATIONAL (Forces, Inc.) is a non-profit educational corporation
organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, USA. Forces, Inc. has
received a charitable tax exemption under Internal Revenue Code 501(c)3.
Your contribution is tax deductible.
FORCES INTERNATIONAL © trademark,
logo and original material copyright © 1995-2004 is property of FORCES
INTERNATIONAL unless otherwise indicated. Original FORCES material may be
reprinted or used in any non-commercial form if proper credit is given to
FORCES and original intent remains intact. All other material remains
property of its creator/owner. |
|
|