 I’ve been onto this topic earlier,when I commented on Aldous vs. Orwell. I will now delve into it in greaterdetail.
In all despoticsystems, mind controllers, language engineers and censors have been busily atwork. Societies that hail freedom and liberty have initially disposed of suchcharacters. But as liberty has been left unguarded, those people have returned.Nowhere is this more clearly visible today, than in the field of tobacco‘control’ - i.e. tobacco illegalization.
Censors used tobe busy eliminating passages in texts containing thoughts or expressions thatmight inspire individuals to usurp or assasinate their aristocratic masters.Today, those same types are busy trying to eliminate pictures of people smokingor references to situations describing smoking.
Censorship hasthus returned. Aristocracy in the form of big health demands that language andmind control be applied to the topic of smoking and even chewing tobacco. We canonly wonder when these aristocrats will demand that pictures of people eatingpeanuts or drinking fizzed sugar water must be eliminated, in order that we, theserfs, do not become inspired to such self devastating activities. Peanutcontrol....
Contemporarymethods are far more sophisticated than ever before. Language control is beingapplied in the most intriguing fashion. Go through the latest mind controllednewspaper, and you will see it everywhere.
For the fun ofit, I’ve compiled a brief list of expressions in newspeak, in which mindcontrollers use expressions to twist the minds of readers. I’ve also provided atranslation in plain english. Amuse yourself with it, and begin to realize whatis really happening beneath the ‘feel good’ journalism that we are bedeviledwith these days.
No wonder thepapers are loosing circulation.
| Newspeak | English |
| activist | personleeching on individuals, entrepreneurs or the state |
| addict | person thatexhibits a behaviour of his liking |
| addiction | somethingyou like to do |
| balanced | one sided |
| caused by | mathematically associated with |
| choose | act ofresponding to indoctrination dogmas |
| civildisobediance | civilresistance - a production of political disobediance |
| clean air | artificialconcept. There is no recipy for clean air. |
| control | prohibit |
| convince | intimidate |
| dangerous | involvingsome element of risk |
| debate | inquisate,heap disdain upon |
| disorder | naturalbehaviour |
| drug | substanceof pleasure |
| drug addict | citizenthat takes a substance of pleasure |
| encourage | enforce |
| fee | tax |
| -free | -prohibited |
| grant | money |
| guidance | manipulation |
| guide | manipulate |
| health fee | tax |
| healthinspector | healthpolice |
| healthy | controlled,manipulated |
| help | coerce |
| hiringpolicy | formalizeddiscrimination practice |
| inform | indoctrinate |
| information | propaganda |
| informed(of person) | indoctrinated |
| legislate | prohibit |
| lobbying | sidestepping constituents |
| basic right | artificialright |
| non profit | pure profit |
| organizedcrime | a form ofentrepreneurship with the purpose of sidestepping legislation thathas defined certain behaviours as illegal, even though they are notnatural crimes |
| passivesmoking | breathing |
| peer review | process bywhich one person asks another person to rubber stamp hisspeculations as being science |
| poison | any matteror substance |
| policy | prohibition |
| protect | interdict,interfere, prohibit |
| prove | speculate |
| publicspace | any areathat is not a private home (they are working on that one) |
| reasonable | prohibitive |
| regulate | limit,prohibit |
| research | the act ofgenerating speculation |
| risk | chance |
| science | speculation, fabrication, lie |
| smoke | air |
| smokefilled | containingair |
| smokingpolicy | smokingprohibition |
| succesful | generatesmoney |
| truth | lie |
| zerotolerant | completelyintolerant. This is an artificial concept. Anything zero tolerantwould perish immediately. There is always tolerance. |
|
| FORCESINTERNATIONAL (Forces, Inc.) is a non-profit educational corporationorganized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, USA. Forces, Inc. hasreceived a charitable tax exemption under Internal Revenue Code 501(c)3. Your contribution is tax deductible.FORCES INTERNATIONAL © trademark,logo and original material copyright © 1995-2004 is property of FORCESINTERNATIONAL unless otherwise indicated. Original FORCES material may bereprinted or used in any non-commercial form if proper credit is given toFORCES and original intent remains intact. All other material remainsproperty of its creator/owner. |
THOUGHT ENGINEERING Click here toreturn to Søren Højbjerg's main page
