Cigarettes Don't Cause Cancer

Click here to return to main page Powered by reason, driven by passion

Click on the banner to donate now
Click on the banner to donate now

The Evidence

The scientific archive that debunks 50 years of superstitions onsmoking


CIGARETTES DON'T CAUSE CANCER! Click here toreturn to Søren Højbjerg's main page

Information andContacts
About us


Straightening up Eaters
Outcasting Smellers
The Theatre of the Absurd
The Disgusting
The WHO gang section
Let's kill them-for their own good
At the service of the pharmaceutical industry


Norman Kjono
James Leavey
Judith Hatton
Andy Ludlow
Søren Højbjerg
Gian Turci


John Luik
Pierre Lemieux
Martha Perske
Wanda Hamilton

Archives andResearch Materials

News and Articles Archive
Past Front Pages of FORCES International
(startingJuly 3, 2000)
Historical Files- The milestones in the tobacco wars
Prohibition, then and now
Constitutional and Antitrust Violations of theMultistate Tobacco Settlement
WHO SCANDAL The CD thatsays it all on political corruption and frauds on smoking

Special Reports

Pharmaceuticalmultinationals: buying governments, selling antismoking
Big Drug's Nicotine War


Rush Limbaugh featured site

Tobacco Award 2002

 Lycos top 5% in 1998 Award for Outstanding Political Web Site

I have chewed my way through theverdict of Lord Nimmo Smith in the case of Mrs. McTear versus Imperial TobaccoLimited, Edinburgh, Scotland, published on May 31, 2005. On the basis of theverdict, I claim that smoking tobacco has not been shown to cause cancer oflung.

 Read the verdict here. It is a daunting task, but in the pursuit of truth well worth theeffort.

As for the credibilty of Forces, I present the followingstatement by the judge (Mr. McEachran represents the pursuer, and Mr. Jones thedefender):

[6.166] Mr McEachran's mainargument, as I understood it, was that the conclusion that cigarette smokingcould cause lung cancer had met with general acceptance in the scientificcommunity by the late 1950s, was accepted by the media in the 1970s, wastaught at medical schools and reflected in textbooks, and could be seenstated in a series of substantial multi_disciplinary reports, which hecalled the "multi_doctor studies", listed at para.[6.30], to the extent thatthe conclusions of IARC 1986 had never been challenged. This is all verywell, but I have to say that I am reminded of the Bellman in Lewis Carroll's The Hunting of the Snark, who said: "What I tell you three times istrue". But however often a conclusion may be repeated, it is only as soundas the research on which it is based, and of this I have seen none.However eminent and numerous the authors of a report may be, however manyarticles they may have read before preparing their texts, however many pagestheir reports may run to, are to no avail if I am then shown no more thanthe conclusions reached after all this effort. It is no good to tell me thata report is 400 or 600 pages long, and indeed to ask me to weigh the reportin my hand, as Mr McEachran at one time asked me to do with UKHC 2000Vol.II, and its list of references extends to several hundred items, withoutletting me see any of the text on which the conclusions are based. Indeed,as Mr Jones pointed out, the very length of a report may emphasise theinappropriateness of going simply to its conclusions: the length showshow much ground there was to cover before the conclusions could be stated.The conclusions, taken on their own, are no more than oracularpronouncements.

Isn’t that what Forces has been saying for a decade" Layers oflies have been troweled upon each other. Repeating a mantra may result in theincrease of its murmerring, but that does not make the mantra any truer.

Long term members of Forces should take a well deserved momentof reflection. Breathe in the feeling of vindication. The battle has not been invain. This is a victory! The fighting is not over. It helps to recognize avictory. It gives impetus for further battle.

As for the credibilty of the WHO, the following excerpt from theWHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, article 8.1 springs to my mind:

"Partiesrecognize that scientific evidence has unequivocally established thatexposure to tobacco smoke causes death, disease and disability.”

Oh, yeah"

Why is it that this unequivocal scientific evidence didnot manage to find its way into the court of law in Edinburgh, Scotland"

Is it because the mountain of evidence that tobacco smoke causes death, disease and disablity is so great that it cannot make its waythrough the doors of a court of law"

The only evidence that exposure to tobacco smoke causes death, disease and disability is purely epidemiological. This mustmean that, according to WHO, the only credible type of science is epidemiology! No other form of hitherto recognised science has been able toestablish that tobacco smoke causes anything but irritation.

Are we to understand that WHO believes that Isaac Newtonsobservations in the world of physics are invalid, because these were notinferred through the use of epidemiology" Gone must also be Einsteinstheory of relativity, since it was not based on epidemiology. Can we relyon the observations that the world is round" Was it established through the useof epidemiology"


Epidemiology is not science. It’s mostly junk science.

According to real science smoking tobacco does not causecancer of lung. Join Lord Nimmo Smith in his trashing of anti tobacco attemptsto spoof it with statistical mumbo jumbo!

Cigarettes don’t cause cancer!

That’s our call for battle!








































FORCESINTERNATIONAL (Forces, Inc.) is a non-profit educational corporationorganized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, USA. Forces, Inc. hasreceived a charitable tax exemption under Internal Revenue Code 501(c)3. Your contribution is tax deductible.FORCES INTERNATIONAL © trademark,logo and original material copyright © 1995-2004 is property of FORCESINTERNATIONAL unless otherwise indicated. Original FORCES material may bereprinted or used in any non-commercial form if proper credit is given toFORCES and original intent remains intact. All other material remainsproperty of its creator/owner.


Help Us

Contact Us

Chapters and Affiliates

Join us

The Constitution ofFORCES International
The Honour Committee


The ABCs of ETS
Buy this book today and understand

The passive smoke fraud as it has never been explained and documented before

Forums and newsletters

The United Pro Choice Smokers Rights Newsletter

Read The United Pro Choice Smokers RightsNewsletter

Enter the SpeakEasy forum!

Artists for liberty

Click here to visit Joe Jacson's site
Support FORCES and buy this beautiful songfor only $0.99!

Click here to visit Doug Jenson's Corner
Click here to connect to Doug's corner

Click here to visit Kel VanBuskirk's Corner
Click here toconnect to Kel's corner


Mr. "WeDrink, We Smoke, We Interrupt"








FORCES is supported solely by the efforts of the readers. Please become a member or donate what you can.

Contact Info
Forces Contacts
Media Contacts
Links To Archived Categories

The Evidence
Inside Forces
About Forces
Book case