|
 June 15, 2007 -- Appalled but not surprised, yesterday I read on
FORCES about Belmont and the killing of property rights in the US. I may
add that Canada is following the same path. I also read what I shared
all along – that, in the courts, almost the only possible chance
to win is to demonstrate the incredible fraud about passive smoking,
thus proving that the “public health” institutions and the politicians
who listen to them are rotten to the bone and ignorant, respectively.
That would be quite easy to do: all it takes is the money that is not
there. But, at this time, there is more to the antitobacco equation than
the mere statistical fraud and false representation of evidence by
“public health”: it is cultural engineering and programmed
social hatred.
The world-wide antismoking movement, financed heavily by the
pharmaceutical multinationals and coordinated by their official partner,
the World Health Organization, wants to modify the culture and
institutionalize hatred against smoking in particular, and lifestyle
choices in general with whatever it takes: hatred, corruption,
intimidation and falsification are perfectly legitimate means in its
eyes. The medical associations are the enablers, the mass media are the
vehicle, the politicians and the ministries of health are the actuators.
Even before proving the passive smoke fraud, the war is cultural.
To win the war tomorrow, many things can be done today. The smoking
culture is to be perpetuated because that is exactly what they promised
to eradicate: our way of life. Now more than ever smoking is
distinction. Rather than addiction, those who smoke today show
intelligence and uncommon independent thinking. We have to teach the
youth about the frauds on primary and passive smoke. We have to
engage the “authorities” and the antismoking operatives in what they
carefully avoid by strategy: publicly and legally challenge them on
the “science” they use for cultural engineering. We know they will
not respond – because they have something to hide – and that is to be
used against them. But to do that, you have to tangibly help the only
organization in the world that has the guts and the knowledge to take
these criminals to court:
us .
But there is more than that: we have to create economic damage;
we have to get rid of our induced guilt and show pride in
our way or life. We have to stop listening to the propaganda, and stop
wasting time in dissecting the hundreds of lies that are produced daily
by “public health’s” fraudulent machine. Instead, we have to pass
summary judgment that everything they say is a fraud, and rather
focus on destroying the mechanism that makes them go. In short, we have
to adopt THE VERY SAME ATTITUDE of our enemies: zero tolerance – the
debate is over. Now it is time for action. And action means labour
and money: the “winning the hearts and the minds” attitude won’t
cut it in a system that only understands the brutal power of emotional
violence and lawsuits anymore than the “smoking is bad, but…” nonsense
did.
That means that we have to create an active – not passive – real and
measurable force that in turn creates a political and social problem.
In doing so – yes -- there will be problems for some of us. But a fight
for the restoration of human dignity, for bringing public institutions
back to integrity, for restoring the freedom of choice and property
rights as paramount values of society instead of “health” (so
that we can ALL live free) is definitely worth it.
No “ifs”, “buts” or “ands” about smoking or not. We smoke – and
we are proud. We won’t quit because we are
“socially unacceptable”. >WE< are society too, and
we have EXACTLY the same dignity and rights of non smokers – including
that of practicing our LEGAL lifestyle in public – and no “ifs”, “buts”
or “ands” about that either, “the debate is over”, remember?... We
won’t listen – but we will “deal” with you bastards rather
than you “dealing” with us, and “dealing” with us will imply
consequences -- for you. We are nearly 50% of the productive
population and you will not mess with us – neither in public, nor in
private. Have your stupid way of life, that preaches abstinence from joy
in exchange for inevitable death – but don’t push your trash values
on us and on our children.
Even if you don’t smoke, a precedent like Belmont WILL establish the
“right” of the state to regulate and forbid what you have in your fridge
and in your canteen, when and where to drive your car – and even how to
make love to your spouse if they can help it. And no, THEY WILL NOT STOP
unless WE stop them. Let’s read once again the worlds of City councilman
William Dickenson: “We need to step back and look at what we're doing
when we are legislating in the home. We have the right to do that”
– and make a fundamental, tell tale observation. In the United States
(and soon all over the world, if we don’t stop antitobacco) the value of
property rights and individual domain in one’s own home is so
depreciated that the lowest form of government in the nation ought to
be enough to deny or regulate: City Hall.
How cheap liberty has become after being earned with blood.
OK, now say that you “hate” smoking. Is this the world you want for your
children? If the answer is “no”, then what are you prepared to
do about that? And if the answer is “nothing”, then you
deserve anything you get – but your children still do not -- for
they will have to live in the world you have allowed
antitobacco to create – both smoke-free and liberty-free. May you be
damned.
Comments by Gian Turci, CEO. |
