
December
15, 2003 - Nowadays, and on the health issue, it is quite easy to
play Nostradamus – and so far, we at FORCES have predicted the future better
than he did. Let's have some fun just before the Christmas holidays with
predictions
about coffee.
We should begin by
noting that
coffee is
being
now “studied” at the EU level: here is a link with the EU Fifth
Framework Programme at http://www.caffeineandhealth.net/.
One might ask: “What’s
wrong with that?” Nothing at all.
Nevertheless, we
can already say, without a shade of doubt, that within
a
very few years coffee
will end up the way tobacco did. The health activists and “public health”, while happily conning us on smoking (and obesity as well) must create new
“epidemics” and threats to justify the ongoing flux of money
they command
and their suppression
of freedom of choice – to say nothing of cultural conditioning. In short, the
machine created for smoking must be kept well lubricated, and
diversification (together with false advertisement) is the soul of
the contemporary medical mafias'
business.
The
beginning of the end of coffee will come this January, when the
conclusions of the European “study” on coffee and health
are made
known to us poor, sick little people. Tremors
of "concern" over coffee have been with us
for several years now, and we have covered the issue quite a lot on our
pages. At the beginning of 2004 we will discover, therefore, that coffee
has negative effects on health – starting with cardiovascular
disease – if taken in excess of 2-3 cups a day; they have to start slow.
Later it will be discovered – thanks to the usual interview-based junk
science statistics – that people take
in “dangerous” amounts of caffeine,
which in turn causes a huge number of deaths and diseases. How will that
be calculated? With the same con-science used
for various statistical
attributions,
reinforced by the opinions
of “experts” -- the very same
techniques used today
to con us on smoking or obesity. Once the discovery is acknowledged (with
the ritual “surprise” of the self-appointed “expert-researchers”), the
“prevention” mechanism kicks in: media fanfare, long sequences of
white-coated clowns who state that “there is no doubt” that “coffee
kills”, followed by the tiresome farce of public debate over
the freedom to drink coffee; all that is necessary to start the erosion of
people’s incredulity, their wallets and their lifestyles.
This
will go on for about one year as a preliminary round.
The
fact that not even one death from “caffeine addiction”
is
scientifically demonstrable will do no good (as it didn’t do any
good in the
smoking debate).
The statistical and emotional framework of “public health”
is already firmly in place thanks to the antitobacco frauds, and is
currently expanding to obesity. That notwithstanding, several junk science
studies (oops, sorry –
pieces of scientific research) will be produced (at
first for and against, then just against: that is necessary to show
the “preponderance of the evidence”) on the issue,
accompanied by
great happiness
among the grant junkies. At this point the
precautionary
principle will be invoked, according to which coffee producers will
have to prove that coffee does not hurt people, and thus prove
their innocence. And even in the impossible case that a negative can
be proven, the precautionary principle still protects the immunity of the
criminals who use it with the “emergency clause”: it is not necessary
to procure scientific proof that something is dangerous to regulate, tax
or forbid: suspicion is enough. (This perverse principle is
underwritten by the United Nations, and adhered to by the USA, Europe, and
several other nations. It is also one of the pillars for health scares
through the shameful “scientific” scams and policies of the World Health
Organization mafiosos).
This is when the demonisation of the coffee industry
will begin
in earnest; Big
Coffee will be brought down to the level of Philip Morris -- whose
marketing, as we all know, is now based on the mea culpa/boot
licking of “public health” and on bending over to whatever statistical
fraud antismokers feel like making up -- today. Those who oppose
anti-coffee
will (of course)
demonstrate themselves
as either irreparably addicted to the
“drug” (thus badly in need of cessation therapies), or despicable
individuals paid off by the coffee industry, which
(as everyone will be
convinced by then) makes money by making
sick and killing its customers.
At this point it
will only
be natural
for ministers of health
to intervene with a
variety of actions: appeals to the media to silence opposition on the
basis of “responsible information”, and say only bad things about coffee;
when coffee “addicts” are shown, the mass-media’s job
will be to make them
look either sick or
like lunatics
and to make the health cons look good. In the
meantime, parasites such as Stanton Glantz
will get millions of pharmaceutical
dollars to count coffees instead of cigarettes in the movies, and to push
for the limitation first (and the elimination second) of coffee
advertisement,
to fight yet another product “harmful to health”. This
will
be done with the cooperation of legal sharks such as
John Banzhaff and his
gangs, who will smell blood in the water once again. Furthermore, a minimum
age will be established for coffee or (caffeine-based) Coca-Cola drinking
to protect the children, of course. And, as usual, the ministries
of health (eternal marionettes of the Pharma-industry)
will use the resources
of the taxpayers to promote Pharma-remedies through propaganda.
The
inevitable will come next: while the WHO gang produces a document that
legitimises all the frauds
about coffee and calls for yet another
international framework convention against what kills (_____ put the
millions of deaths
per year here), a super-tax on coffee
will be imposed by
various governments to compensate for the social costs
attributed to coffee addiction by the “experts”.
Stand
by for shows with repentant coffee drinkers, TV interviews in hospitals
with
the victims of Big Coffee, and
calls for mandatory warnings on coffee
packs. After all, coffee is a huge target market: almost 90% of the
population of the world drinks it (what an epidemic!) and that population
needs therapy! But it will not end there: stand by for junk science
associations with cancer (probably stomach and liver, but let’s not
forget the bladder!) as well; they’ll start slowly -- almost timidly at
first -- and then they will gradually
increase, to enable the various body
part and cancer societies to access millions of public dollars: somebody
must pay for the new Mercedeses
driven by
the upper echelon
of some of today's "non-profits"!
At
that point, the coffee drinker
won't
be able to help feeling guilty towards himself
and society. His children
will be coming home brainwashed and authorised by
“public health” to disrespect him and ma once again
(for their own good).
Automatic coffee dispensers will be under attack, and will disappear from
airports and schools, while the smell of coffee will turn out to be as
disgusting tomorrow as the smell of cigarettes is today. Passive coffee?
Never underestimate the criminals of contemporary “public health”: they’ll
find a way to make it stick. The storm troopers that today burst into
restaurants without a warrant (they don't need any: they are "public
health") searching for ashtrays will have yet another duty. Indeed,
fascism has finally found a way to get rid of all those useless
constitutional and juridical protections that are only good
for slowing down
the speedy recovery of us sick people: it is called public health,
the supreme expression of that therapeutic state Hitler dreamt of so much
for so long.
Are you smiling, Adolph?...
Go on,
keep laughing and say that we are exaggerating. You did
that for cigarettes, hamburgers and alcohol. Come on, deny it.
Actually, we’ll do it for you: here is a list of ready-made
excuses to use at the proper time, to justify your cowardice, laziness
and negligence -- to say nothing of your fear of authority.
This list will help
you feel better about letting real fascists run your life -- without
having to bother
to
“hang
‘em high”.
|
EXCUSES AND
JUSTIFICATIONS TO USE FOR NOT REACTING TO THE SUPPRESSION OF COFFEE,
AND TO BEND OVER ONCE AGAIN TO THE FASCISTS IN WHITE COATS |
|
YESTERDAY FOR SMOKING |
TOMORROW FOR COFFEE |
|
>
IN THE PRELIMINARY PHASES OF THE FRAUD < |
|
"It
will never happen here." |
"It
will never happen here." |
|
"Nooo...
Philip Morris will take care of silencing those lunatics..." |
"Nooo...
Coca Cola will take care of silencing those lunatics..." |
|
"You’ve got to be kidding… with all the money the government makes
on it..." |
"You’ve got to be kidding… with all the money the government makes
on it..." |
|
"You are joking: everybody does it. One thing is safety
belts, another is smoking! " |
"You are joking: everybody does it. One thing is smoking,
another is coffee! " |
|
>
WHILE THE FRAUD AND DEMONISATION CAMPAIGN IS IN PROGRESS
< |
|
"It’s just a trend: don’t worry, it’s gonna go away." |
"It’s just a trend: don’t worry, it’s gonna go away." |
|
"We
must use tolerance and courtesy to win the public
relation campaign, and show that the antismoking health nuts are
fanatics; people will understand." |
"We
must use tolerance and courtesy to win the public
relation campaign, and show that the anticoffee health nuts are
fanatics; people will understand." |
|
"It
is all a farce: they’ll never dare endanger so many jobs,
are you kidding?..." |
"It
is all a farce: they’ll never dare endanger so many jobs,
are you kidding?..." |
|
"We
are in (put here the country where you live): you’ll see, they’ll
change this folly at the last moment with some backdoor manoeuvre." |
"We
are in (put here the country where you live): you’ll see, they’ll
change this folly at the last moment with some backdoor manoeuvre." |
|
>
AFTER THE DEMONISATION AND PROHIBITION IS COMPLETE, OR IS WELL ON
ITS WAY < |
|
"I
don’t care about them: I’ll keep having my cigarette in
hiding." |
"I
don’t care about them: I’ll keep having my coffee in hiding." |
|
"And what can I do about it...?!" (variation: "That’s the way
it is – sigh – get used to it.") |
"And what can I do about it...?!" (variation: "That’s the way
it is – sigh – get used to it.") |
|
"After all, it’s for my own good." |
"After all, it’s for my own good." |
|
"What do you wanna
do, start a civil war for a cigarette? It’s not worth it!" |
"What do you wanna
do, start a civil war for a coffee? It’s not worth it!" |
|
"We
have to respect the rights of others." |
"We
have to respect the rights of others." |
|
“All
doctors say it… can they all be wrong?...” |
“All
doctors say it… can they all be wrong?...” |
|
"After all, we cannot
stay
behind other countries." |
"After all, we cannot
stay
behind other countries." |
|
“I
smoke
too much anyway.” |
“I
drink too many coffees anyway.” |
|
"Look, we are a democracy: we’ve got to do what the majority says.
Unfortunately I smoke, but I don’t want to bother others
– and certainly I don’t do it in front of the children!” |
"Look, we are a democracy: we’ve got to do what the majority says.
Unfortunately I drink coffee, but I don’t want to bother
others – and certainly I don’t do it in front of the
children!” |
Gian Turci
FORCES Italiana,
president
FORCES International, C.E.O.