June 14th, 1999 - The Socialist Clinton administration and their international moppets keep talking about the evils of tobacco while the WHO, now reduced to nothing more than the lurid arm of the US government and the pharmaceutical industry, spews out computer-generated statistics about non-existing world epidemics.

While "epidemics" about "smoking-related diseases" can be easily made to grow or shrink according to political agendas, some truth is hidden and the bottom of this pile of lies: the number of respiratory disease, asthma, and lung cancer cases has increased tremendously in recent years.

How do we know? Because there is a tangible count of people affected by those diseases. The great fraud is not in the count itself, but in the claim that those diseases are tobacco-related -- and the silent implication that the elimination of tobacco use would significantly reduce that count.

An article by the title: "Study finds toxic air in portable classrooms -- carcinogen exposure may affect 2 million kids" was recently published by the rabidly anti-smoking San Francisco Comical, sorry -- typo -- Chronicle.

The article talks about the high concentration of chemicals existing in the air of portable classrooms. Those chemicals are released by glues, and by other materials used for the classroom's construction. In those classrooms, of course, smoking is forbidden so severely, we can expect any male perpetrator to be hung by his testicles. That was the favorite way of Thomas Le Marle de Coucy in the early 12th century to punish those who did not want to submit to his arrogance.

Why do we believe the San Francisco Chronicle this time? Because the measurements were performed with particle concentration measuring instruments, and they are not speculations based on assumptions from theoretical associations by corrupted activists with a political agendas -- I know, that's a mouthful: I should have simply called them crooks. Here is the article.

Now that you have read this article, let us compare the data in it with the data concerning Environmental Tobacco Smoke, just to highlight once again the political corruption of priorities, and the scientific frauds of the anti-tobacco cartel.

According to the "Bible" of ETS chemical analysis, "The Chemistry of Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Composition and Measurement," by Guerin MR, Jenkins RA, Tomkins BA -- Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 1992:

"Environments where heavy smoking and/or poor ventilation contribute to visibly obvious high ETS contamination can contain VOCs at concentrations of 50-200 micrograms per cubic meter." (Page 225)

This simply means that the levels read in the portable classrooms are 10 times higher than those of ETS under the worst possible ventilation conditions. Please note that phenols and benzene are included.

As far as formaldehyde is concerned, the "Bible" says:

"...In some situations, where smoking rates are high and ventilation is minimal, there is a clear contribution to formaldehyde from ETS in the order of a few 10s of a micrograms per cubic meter". (Page 207)

That means some hundredth of part per billion in a cubic metre (39 cubic feet of air), which is far below what is legally allowed (1 full part per billion), and definitely FAR LESS than what has been measured in the portable classrooms. And the "Bible" could find no arsenic in ETS!

Why don't we see the California anti-tobacco scum posting ads, issuing bans, tormenting the airwaves, and lobbying governments to protect the children? Why are children not taught to lecture their teachers on this matter? And why are not the teachers getting those children to miss school days for the usual processions in front of city councils (the favorite way to intimidate city halls into issuing smoking bans)? At list this time the processions would be for something real!

And where is Stanton Glantz's concern on Smokerscreen and other politically sold-out media? Where is ASH's John Banzaff with his ignorant, hysterical slogans such as: "If you can smell it, it can kill you," created to support smoking bans in parks? What are they all waiting for -- the next money shot from the pharmaceutical industry, or the next grant from the crooks in the White House?

Why don't we proceed with some health cost recovery lawsuit against the California education system, which is so fond of children instigation against smokers? There is money there!

Maybe the suggestions by these paladins of corruption would be as simple as instructing the teachers to open the windows to let the emissions out! Wrong. In this case, they would let emissions in, and if you click here you'll see why.

Though this is bad enough, unfortunately it's not all. What does the politically correct, mentally conditioned parent do to take children to school, and protect them against the rampant assaults by criminal low life (all impotent, divorced smokers, of course ^[1], ^[2], ^[3], ^[4], ^[5], ^[6])?

The parent entrusts the children to schools buses, or even takes them personally to school in his/her neat, smoke-free car, as any good, "educated" parent should do.

"SMOKE-FREE CAR?!" Not according to this recently published article from the LA TIMES we found on the Internet. This article also says it like it is. It seems that where there is no anti-tobacco cartel corruption/intimidation involved, the California press occasionally still prints the truth.

In this article we see how the concentration of pollutants in "smoke-free" school buses and cars that take children to school, for example, is 10 TIMES higher than what is in the yellow air around sidewalks, according once again to direct measurement studies. And incidentally, this study is not unique: at least a previous study from Sweden came to similar conclusions several years ago.

Darn, how can we twist those digital displays that are showing immensely larger concentrations of the SAME POLLUTANTS of second hand smoke in "smoke-free" environments? Damned is technology, and even more damned be those stupid, naive, honest technicians who are so dumb as to put a monkey wrench in our lie machine! Let us suppress and ignore this information, it may make people compare! Couldn't they just have run a meta-analisys with statistical computers like everybody else? At least there would have been some "room to play with!"

So, there you have it: Californian children living in the yellow atmosphere of their cities are taken to school in smoke-free cars and buses where the yellow air is ten times more deadly than the yellow air of the sidewalks. Then they are amassed in portable non-smoking classrooms where carcinogens are maybe a hundred times more concentrated than in the worst possible smoking pub. In these classrooms, antismoking "education" is taught with a great deal of zeal, hate, and public money, and awards are given to those children who can hate the most while ignoring that Da Vinci was not an emperor of Rome. And when they come home, they get to live in "energy-efficient" water-tight houses with poor ventilation, the result of another previous American hysteria: energy conservation.

The Church excommunicated Thomas Le Marle de Coucy, and its anathema forced him to show repentance, and hide his own arrogance. When he died in France in 1130, he left hefty riches to the Church to buy his way into Heaven, and the Church officially sent him there.

As it was in the 12th century, in our 20th century the graces of the powers that be are for sale while eyes are shut in greed, and inconvenient truths are ignored.

Will today's Thomas Le Marle de Coucys shape the Third Millenium into a computer-run Dark Age? Let us endeavor to ensure that their excommunication by science and truth gets them hung by the testicles -- forever -- and that true priorities, tolerance and common sense permanently replace the false chivalry of the health cartel.

Gian Turci
FORCES INTERNATIONAL