"The
vaccine will initially be targeted at smokers who want to give up the habit. Although the
drug would not take away the nicotine craving, cigarettes would become completely
unsatisfying, making it pointless to smoke them."
"The drug could also be used to vaccinate youngsters before they even
started smoking."
"Making such a drug available to the public would be a landmark in
the history of vaccines.
It would be the first time this sort of approach had been
used to alter behaviour on such a potentially large scale." |

November 17, 1999 - Read the
entire article
and tremble -- not just as a smoker, but as a free-living being. And remember: this
is not a scientific hypothesis -- they are actually developing what they
are describing.
This sad and obtuse article from Australia highlights the terrible
social dangers of a health establishment that is gone completely uncontrolled.
First, the vaccine will not work because it does not keep into account
that smoking is not about the intake of nicotine, which is the minimal
part of it. If nicotine were all there was to smoking, the "patches" and other
tobacco substitutes would work already. Smoking is about flavour, ritual, emotion,
distinction, and the joy of living -- something the dark people of the health
cartel and their sympathisers cannot, apparently, conceive.
Second, even assuming that smoking is all about nicotine, the lack of
the nicotine's effect would drive people to smoke much more to compensate.
Third, the unscrupulous pharmaceutical industry is willing to put on
the market an unnecessary vaccine with unknown side effects that can become
evident years after vaccination -- though this attitude is commonplace in an
industry that has fallen so low; it finances anti-tobacco and its fraudulent, anti-social
activities for its own marketing interests.
But the most dangerous aspect of what the article describes is not the
futile attempt to eliminate a joy of life, such as smoking may be, for those who enjoy it.
The tremendous danger here is that, thorugh vaccines and genetics, the
pharmaceutical industry wants to control and condition people's behaviour -- for
the good of people, and only for "unwanted behaviours," of course.
But who is to establish what behaviour
is unwanted? Obviously, not the individual anymore. State, pharmaceutical industry,
doctors, and other lobby groups will establish the "good behaviour" of the
moment. Then the "good behaviour" will change according to the changes in the
interests of these groups. And more vaccines and genetics will be made available to
protect people from other people - and from themselves - as well as to replace choices
with pharmaceutically-imposed conditioning.
MANDATORY VACCINATIONS to children will ensure that
the "bad" choice is chemically and genetically prevented even before the
individual has the option. This will be a real panacea for lazy parents and
irresponsible politicians, thus it will become a very pragmatic, desirable approach for
our short-sighted generation. Technically this approach flows very well: by chemically
and/or genetically lobotomising children and adults, we then eliminate the experience of
joy in certain "unwanted" behaviours. With the joy gone, the drive is gone. One
could even argue that this is not just the key to health, but even the key to happiness:
it has been said that the key to happiness is the lack of want, hasn't it?
The subtle proposals of Nazi
medicine are now coming back quite openly under the guise of mass smoking cessation
programs (the great social control test experiment), war on drugs (anti-drug
"vaccines"), and Medicare costs (nobody questions the profits of the
pharmaceutical industry and doctors, however), while we have fired God, classic school
education, humanism and spirituality as forms of social restraint and evolution.
Let's not fool ourselves. The technology to perform that kind of social
lobotomy is already here and, as soon as it is available at mass
level, it will be used, and ENFORCED -- not just with physical and
legal force, but by effectively closing all functions of, and access to, social life
to those who are not vaccinated, thus not submitted to the behavioural impositions
(they will be called "standards") of the health cartel.
The ultimate contempt for liberty and self-determination is disguised
as health "concerns". The health cartel wants to turn us all into easy-to-control
- thus easy to use - Borg. And it wants to make sure we
understand that resistance is futile.
This - way more than the menial freedom to enjoy a product many call
beautiful, othesrs harmful - is the ultimate battle being fought today. A battle between a
dark health establishment that uses governments to force its "health revolution"
(read: social and personal behaviour conditioning) on us; and an enlightened
minority who still believes in self-determination, independence from the state, and
enjoyment of life.
The outcome of this battle will determine not just the right to enjoy
tobacco but, in a very close future, the physical and mental configuration
of our civilisation, and even of our species.
Unless the health cartel is ruthlessly brought under control now,
the cubical Borg starships of Star Trek: The Next Generation will indeed fly not
through space, but through our schools, universities, homes,
and workplaces, as they are already flying through the airwaves. Those ships will
be loaded with vaccinated, possibly microchip-implanted "healthy" and
non-smoking Borg who will be on a mission to identify and absorb
those few who are still the victims of such misguided, unhealthy concepts as independent
choice and self-determination -- or even state-disapproved joys like eating fat or red meat, and
smoking or drinking. Indeed, all those concept are, and they'll always be, great dangers
to those who want to pull the strings of social control.
And if somebody out there still thinks that we are exaggerating, just
keep doing what most to best: do nothing; just wait, and see -- until it's too
late.
Gian Turci
FORCES INTERNATIONAL