Search the Scientific Evidence database

You are currently inside the

Official Reports on Passive Smoking

area of the Scientific Evidence Portal

From the ETS sections as well as the Ethics and Policies sections it is crystal-clear that the dangers of passive smoking are a fabrication based on unethical statistical methodology. Why, then, public health authorities endorse that fabrication to the point of prohibition and enormous propaganda budgets? Can’t they read? Are they that incompetent? No, they are not; but they see the passive smoking issue as an essential tool to create a more and more hostile social environment for the smoker, so that he quits active smoking that, they believe, “causes” so many deaths and diseases. It is incontrovertible that the top health authorities of the world, through the official reports below, want to create that environment. It is equally incontrovertible that those authorities have made the conscious decision to turn to fraud and misrepresentation to eradicate a time-honoured habit for which they cannot scientifically prove one fatality. This section therefore represents the twilight between junk science and ideology.

(+ and - allowed)

Or try:

Note: Loading may take a while so please be patient

Full 'Official Reports on Passive Smoking' category Scientific Evidence Listing (9 documents)

Showing results 0 to 9 of 9

FORCES is supported solely by the efforts of the readers. Please become a member or donate what you can.

Contact Info
Forces Contacts
Media Contacts
Evidence Categories
Quick Look-Up
List of Methodological Errors in ETS Studies
Hill's Criteria and Authoritative Citations
What Must an Epidemiologic Study Warrant?
Table of All Studies on ETS and Lung Cancer up to 2006

Pie Charts of ETS/Lung Cancer Studies
How many cigarettes must be smoked to create an ETS danger?

Passive Smoking: an Institutional Problem
A 13-minute video to understand the fraud

If you like to read rather then listen, download
Now available for free