webmaster

<div style="text-align: justify;">People are tired of getting pushed around. We see it all around us.<br />
&nbsp;</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">Jon Hemminghaus will not equivocate, dissemble, or flaccidly whine about fairness.&nbsp; He knows what’s right and he is standing up for himself.<br />
&nbsp;</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">Smoking tobacco will always be with us.&nbsp; While circumventing unjust laws will continue unabated there is a right way to fight.<br />
&nbsp;</div>

<img hspace="4" align="left" alt="" src="https://www.forces.org/userfiles/video_button.jpg" />Navigating amongst bad news and moral deterioration is depressing. We all need a laugh now and then.<br />
<br />
<br type="_moz" />

<div style="text-align: justify;"><img hspace="5" align="left" alt="" src="https://www.forces.org/userfiles/audio_button.jpg" />Many of our readers are already familiar with Lauren Colby, now interviewed, for our latest Round Table presentation. Lauren is well known in the anti-prohibition movement for his uncompromising position against the &ldquo;smoking causes cancer&rdquo; tenet of antitobacco orthodoxy.<br />
&nbsp;</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">If only we had a Ministry of Truth, sigh the junk &quot;scientists&quot; and the commissars that transform junk into public policy.<br />
&nbsp;</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">Yes, there is a definite disadvantage that the global warming fraudsters have next to the antitobacco fraudsters: we have satellite photographs and thermometers.<br />
&nbsp;</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;"><img hspace="5" align="left" alt="" src="https://www.forces.org/userfiles/audio_button.jpg" />We recommend listening to this talk show by Dave Hitt from The Quick Hitts Podcast. The title is &ldquo;Sickly Wikipedia&rdquo;. Do not trust Wikipedia. It is controlled by antitobacco.<br />
&nbsp;</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">Suddenly the junk scientists who always have all the answers say there is one little item about which they find it impossible to render an opinion. Why are we not surprised? Read this: &ldquo;The Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) in its opinion on smokeless tobacco products addressed their health effects and addiction potential.&rdquo;<br />
&nbsp;</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">Hold onto your stomach and read this paper by a convinced Health Nazi. It’s worth knowing about as an example of the morally blind zealousness of Healthism. It is important to review evidence of the rot at the core of institutional integrity. This paper is hateful. There is one value in it. When society can be convinced to take balanced perspective such hatefulness shall be finally and fully recognised. When the light of reason shines on papers such as this they will serve formidably toward the &quot;denormalization&quot; of antitobacco.<br />
&nbsp;</div>